|
|
Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue
http://informitv.com/news/2009/12/11/bbchdquality/
I certainly didn't know this bit: "Strangely, the BBC continues to broadcast high-definition to the rest of Europe at around 16Mbps in Full HD 1920x1080." Unbelievable! -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - digital radio news & info Check that I haven't accused James "pathological liar" Cridland of being biased towards DAB and biased against Internet radio: Tick Check that I've deleted all racist and/or homophobic language: Tick Check that there are no funeral magazines and/or addresses of senior members of the DAB industry included: Tick Check that I've observed Sean "My Personal Obsessive Stalker" Inglis's (Usenet username: seani) "How Steve Must Behave on Usenet Rulebook (Totally Inapplicable to Other Users Edition)": Tick |
Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue
On Dec 16, 12:59*pm, "DAB sounds worse than FM"
wrote: http://informitv.com/news/2009/12/11/bbchdquality/ I certainly didn't know this bit: "Strangely, the BBC continues to broadcast high-definition to the rest of Europe at around 16Mbps in Full HD 1920x1080." Unbelievable! Looks like the Beeb have caught up with their own story too... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8415636.stm What a crock. |
Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:28:04 GMT, Paul Heslop
wrote: Mike wrote: On Dec 16, 12:59 pm, "DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote: http://informitv.com/news/2009/12/11/bbchdquality/ I certainly didn't know this bit: "Strangely, the BBC continues to broadcast high-definition to the rest of Europe at around 16Mbps in Full HD 1920x1080." Unbelievable! Looks like the Beeb have caught up with their own story too... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8415636.stm What a crock. did you read it all? it isn't a whitewash as it contains "She told the BBC that "there is not a major issue with picture quality" and added the corporation had only received one formal complaint. The majority of those leaving comments on her blog post disagreed. "Even my wife can see a reduction in picture quality and she's got cataracts," wrote one." Crucial words are In her blog post, Ms Nagler said that the services was created to be at its best for "typical viewing set ups" and that user groups with standard equipment were happy with the service. What are "typical viewing set ups" and "standard equipment"? -- Peter Duncanson (in uk.tech.digital-tv) |
Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue
On Dec 16, 2:28*pm, Paul Heslop wrote:
Mike wrote: On Dec 16, 12:59 pm, "DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote: http://informitv.com/news/2009/12/11/bbchdquality/ I certainly didn't know this bit: "Strangely, the BBC continues to broadcast high-definition to the rest of Europe at around 16Mbps in Full HD 1920x1080." Unbelievable! Looks like the Beeb have caught up with their own story too... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8415636.stm What a crock. did you read it all? it isn't a whitewash as it contains "She told the BBC that "there is not a major issue with picture quality" and added the corporation had only received one formal complaint. The majority of those leaving comments on her blog post disagreed. "Even my wife can see a reduction in picture quality and she's got cataracts," wrote one." No I meant Crock as in the situation, not the article. I liked the Cataracts comment. |
Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue
"Mike" wrote in message ... On Dec 16, 12:59 pm, "DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote: http://informitv.com/news/2009/12/11/bbchdquality/ I certainly didn't know this bit: "Strangely, the BBC continues to broadcast high-definition to the rest of Europe at around 16Mbps in Full HD 1920x1080." Unbelievable! Looks like the Beeb have caught up with their own story too... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8415636.stm What a crock. I know I have official complained to 3 different parts of the BBC so it must be me mentioned as the only one. The rest of you must be telling lies. LOL OK I only joking, if not you then Danielle Nagler certainly is. Regards David |
Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue
Paul Heslop wrote:
Mike wrote: On Dec 16, 12:59 pm, "DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote: http://informitv.com/news/2009/12/11/bbchdquality/ I certainly didn't know this bit: "Strangely, the BBC continues to broadcast high-definition to the rest of Europe at around 16Mbps in Full HD 1920x1080." Unbelievable! Looks like the Beeb have caught up with their own story too... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8415636.stm What a crock. did you read it all? it isn't a whitewash as it contains "She told the BBC that "there is not a major issue with picture quality" and added the corporation had only received one formal complaint. The majority of those leaving comments on her blog post disagreed. "Even my wife can see a reduction in picture quality and she's got cataracts," wrote one." It was almost a whitewash though - lots of comments about what Danielle Nagler thought on the matter and precious little about what people were actually complaining about. -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - digital radio news & info Check that I haven't accused James "pathological liar" Cridland of being biased towards DAB and biased against Internet radio: Tick Check that I've deleted all racist and/or homophobic language: Tick Check that there are no funeral magazines and/or addresses of senior members of the DAB industry included: Tick Check that I've observed Sean "My Personal Obsessive Stalker" Inglis's (Usenet username: seani) "How Steve Must Behave on Usenet Rulebook (Totally Inapplicable to Other Users Edition)": Tick |
Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue
Peter Duncanson wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:28:04 GMT, Paul Heslop wrote: Mike wrote: On Dec 16, 12:59 pm, "DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote: http://informitv.com/news/2009/12/11/bbchdquality/ I certainly didn't know this bit: "Strangely, the BBC continues to broadcast high-definition to the rest of Europe at around 16Mbps in Full HD 1920x1080." Unbelievable! Looks like the Beeb have caught up with their own story too... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8415636.stm What a crock. did you read it all? it isn't a whitewash as it contains "She told the BBC that "there is not a major issue with picture quality" and added the corporation had only received one formal complaint. The majority of those leaving comments on her blog post disagreed. "Even my wife can see a reduction in picture quality and she's got cataracts," wrote one." Crucial words are In her blog post, Ms Nagler said that the services was created to be at its best for "typical viewing set ups" and that user groups with standard equipment were happy with the service. What are "typical viewing set ups" and "standard equipment"? Kit made by Bush, Alba, Goodmans, presumably. -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - digital radio news & info Check that I haven't accused James "pathological liar" Cridland of being biased towards DAB and biased against Internet radio: Tick Check that I've deleted all racist and/or homophobic language: Tick Check that there are no funeral magazines and/or addresses of senior members of the DAB industry included: Tick Check that I've observed Sean "My Personal Obsessive Stalker" Inglis's (Usenet username: seani) "How Steve Must Behave on Usenet Rulebook (Totally Inapplicable to Other Users Edition)": Tick |
Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue
David wrote:
"Mike" wrote in message ... On Dec 16, 12:59 pm, "DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote: http://informitv.com/news/2009/12/11/bbchdquality/ I certainly didn't know this bit: "Strangely, the BBC continues to broadcast high-definition to the rest of Europe at around 16Mbps in Full HD 1920x1080." Unbelievable! Looks like the Beeb have caught up with their own story too... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8415636.stm What a crock. I know I have official complained to 3 different parts of the BBC so it must be me mentioned as the only one. The rest of you must be telling lies. LOL OK I only joking, if not you then Danielle Nagler certainly is. Nagler's definitely lying. I blame it on her boss though, Simon Nelson, who happens to be the person who chose to use low bit rates on DAB, and he lied about DAB's audio quality whenever he appeared on Feedback and other Radio 4 programmes. So I'd imagine he'll have told her to lie, because that's what he would do. -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - digital radio news & info Check that I haven't accused James "pathological liar" Cridland of being biased towards DAB and biased against Internet radio: Tick Check that I've deleted all racist and/or homophobic language: Tick Check that there are no funeral magazines and/or addresses of senior members of the DAB industry included: Tick Check that I've observed Sean "My Personal Obsessive Stalker" Inglis's (Usenet username: seani) "How Steve Must Behave on Usenet Rulebook (Totally Inapplicable to Other Users Edition)": Tick |
Excellent article on BBC HD picture quality issue
In article ,
Peter Duncanson wrote: In her blog post, Ms Nagler said that the services was created to be at its best for "typical viewing set ups" and that user groups with standard equipment were happy with the service. What are "typical viewing set ups" and "standard equipment"? A 19" ASDA set with no aerial. -- *The man who fell into an upholstery machine is fully recovered* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com