HomeCinemaBanter

HomeCinemaBanter (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/index.php)
-   High definition TV (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Please help achieve HDTV without HDMI... (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/showthread.php?t=65112)

Ken[_7_] November 28th 09 06:50 PM

Please help achieve HDTV without HDMI...
 
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:27:12 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
wrote:

Good overview, Del, but it seems like a lot for a display
that is not 'true hd' (only 720).


720p *is* true HD.


No.


Bert Hyman November 28th 09 07:05 PM

Please help achieve HDTV without HDMI...
 
In Lon
wrote:

At the moment she has the TW Box connected via component video, but
the image is definitely *NOT* HDTV-quality. What can we do to improve
the video?


It's quite possible that you're simply seeing all that your cable box
can deliver.

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN

[email protected] November 28th 09 07:25 PM

Please help achieve HDTV without HDMI...
 
Ken wrote:
On 28 Nov 2009 17:50:30 GMT, wrote:

Good overview, Del, but it seems like a lot for a display
that is not 'true hd' (only 720).

720p *is* true HD.

No.


Sorry Ken, you are plain wrong. 720p is hd,
as is 1080i and 1080p.


No, not for European people.
Here in Europe 720 is only a little (25%) better than our SD (576).


That doesn't mean it isn't hd!

Chip

--
--------------------
http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

Ken[_7_] November 28th 09 07:27 PM

Please help achieve HDTV without HDMI...
 
On 28 Nov 2009 17:50:30 GMT, wrote:

Good overview, Del, but it seems like a lot for a display
that is not 'true hd' (only 720).

720p *is* true HD.


No.


Sorry Ken, you are plain wrong. 720p is hd,
as is 1080i and 1080p.


No, not for European people.
Here in Europe 720 is only a little (25%) better than our SD (576).


Ken[_7_] November 28th 09 07:39 PM

Please help achieve HDTV without HDMI...
 
On 28 Nov 2009 18:25:22 GMT, wrote:

Good overview, Del, but it seems like a lot for a display
that is not 'true hd' (only 720).

720p *is* true HD.

No.

Sorry Ken, you are plain wrong. 720p is hd,
as is 1080i and 1080p.


No, not for European people.
Here in Europe 720 is only a little (25%) better than our SD (576).


That doesn't mean it isn't hd!


720 is too low for HD in Europe.
720 is only Extended density, not High density.


Wes Newell[_2_] November 28th 09 07:53 PM

Please help achieve HDTV without HDMI...
 
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:27:05 +0100, Ken wrote:

On 28 Nov 2009 17:50:30 GMT, wrote:

Good overview, Del, but it seems like a lot for a display that is
not 'true hd' (only 720).

720p *is* true HD.

No.


Sorry Ken, you are plain wrong. 720p is hd, as is 1080i and 1080p.


No, not for European people.
Here in Europe 720 is only a little (25%) better than our SD (576).


No, you're wrong on all counts. 720p HD is 1280x720p (1366x768 on most
all sets sold as 720p). Pal is only 720x576, so 720p is a lot more than
25% better. Pal is just a little better than NTSC, and not anywhere close
to 720p HD. NTSC = 345k pixels. Pal = 414k pixels. 702p (768) HD = 1049k
pixels. Ref:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDTV

--
Want the ultimate in free OTA SD/HDTV Recorder? http://mythtv.org
My Tivo Experience http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/tivo.htm
Tivo HD/S3 compared http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/mythtivo.htm
AMD cpu help http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php

Wes Newell[_2_] November 28th 09 07:56 PM

Please help achieve HDTV without HDMI...
 
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 07:44:50 -0800, Lon wrote:

Constructive/gratifying responses -- THANK YOU.

She'll pick up an HDMIDVI cable today, which for a few dollars should
optimize the situation.


Make sure she has the proper sound cable(s) if not already.

--
Want the ultimate in free OTA SD/HDTV Recorder? http://mythtv.org
My Tivo Experience http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/tivo.htm
Tivo HD/S3 compared http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/mythtivo.htm
AMD cpu help http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php

Charlie Hoffpauir November 28th 09 08:38 PM

Please help achieve HDTV without HDMI...
 
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:25:03 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
wrote:

In article ,
Ken wrote:

On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:27:12 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
wrote:

Good overview, Del, but it seems like a lot for a display
that is not 'true hd' (only 720).

720p *is* true HD.


No.


Yes, it is.

It may not be sufficient for YOUR desires, but 720p is high definition.


Someone must have elected Ken as god when we weren't looking.

Ken[_7_] November 28th 09 11:18 PM

Please help achieve HDTV without HDMI...
 
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:53:13 +0000 (UTC), Wes Newell
wrote:

On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:27:05 +0100, Ken wrote:

On 28 Nov 2009 17:50:30 GMT, wrote:

Good overview, Del, but it seems like a lot for a display that is
not 'true hd' (only 720).

720p *is* true HD.

No.

Sorry Ken, you are plain wrong. 720p is hd, as is 1080i and 1080p.


No, not for European people.
Here in Europe 720 is only a little (25%) better than our SD (576).


No, you're wrong on all counts. 720p HD is 1280x720p (1366x768 on most
all sets sold as 720p). Pal is only 720x576, so 720p is a lot more than
25% better. Pal is just a little better than NTSC, and not anywhere close
to 720p HD. NTSC = 345k pixels. Pal = 414k pixels. 702p (768) HD = 1049k
pixels. Ref:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDTV



576 + 25% = 720


Ken[_7_] November 28th 09 11:20 PM

Please help achieve HDTV without HDMI...
 
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:25:03 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
wrote:

It may not be sufficient for YOUR desires, but 720p is high definition.


Not for us european people.
25% increase is pathetic.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com