|
alteration to Tyne Tess and YTV coverage
On Calendar tonight they welcomed the new viewers thay had gained from Tyne
Tees 'as the result of digital mapping'. Presumably this refers to DSAT, meaning that DSAT viewers in Thirsk and Harrogate will get YTV whilst terrestrial viewers in the same area are likely to see Tyne Tees from Bilsdale. Is my supposition correct? Bill |
alteration to Tyne Tess and YTV coverage
I'll let you know at the weekend when I'm next in Harrogate. Normally I
get YTV on Freeview and whatever I chose on my FTA DSAT box. I hope that they haven't b*ggered-up my Freeview service - it's poor as it is. Clem Bill Wright wrote: On Calendar tonight they welcomed the new viewers thay had gained from Tyne Tees 'as the result of digital mapping'. Presumably this refers to DSAT, meaning that DSAT viewers in Thirsk and Harrogate will get YTV whilst terrestrial viewers in the same area are likely to see Tyne Tees from Bilsdale. Is my supposition correct? Bill |
alteration to Tyne Tess and YTV coverage
Bill Wright wrote:
On Calendar tonight they welcomed the new viewers thay had gained from Tyne Tees 'as the result of digital mapping'. Presumably this refers to DSAT, meaning that DSAT viewers in Thirsk and Harrogate will get YTV whilst terrestrial viewers in the same area are likely to see Tyne Tees from Bilsdale. Is my supposition correct? I think so, a number of N Yorks punters have received a post card from Sky this last week informing them that their ITV 1 region was changing, and Sky+ users would need to reset any ITV 1 recordings. The same is also happening in the Gloucester and Cheltenham area, this week their post code mapping has moved from Meridian (as a legacy of the old defunct Central South region) to HTV West. -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. http://www.paras.org.uk/ |
alteration to Tyne Tess and YTV coverage
"Mark Carver" wrote in message ... Bill Wright wrote: On Calendar tonight they welcomed the new viewers thay had gained from Tyne Tees 'as the result of digital mapping'. Presumably this refers to DSAT, meaning that DSAT viewers in Thirsk and Harrogate will get YTV whilst terrestrial viewers in the same area are likely to see Tyne Tees from Bilsdale. Is my supposition correct? I think so, a number of N Yorks punters have received a post card from Sky this last week informing them that their ITV 1 region was changing, and Sky+ users would need to reset any ITV 1 recordings. The same is also happening in the Gloucester and Cheltenham area, this week their post code mapping has moved from Meridian (as a legacy of the old defunct Central South region) to HTV West. About time too! There's plenty of Oxfordshire viewers upset enough at receiving Meridian without the ridiculous situation of Gloucs viewers receiving it too. |
alteration to Tyne Tess and YTV coverage
"Mark Carver" wrote in message
... Bill Wright wrote: On Calendar tonight they welcomed the new viewers thay had gained from Tyne Tees 'as the result of digital mapping'. Presumably this refers to DSAT, meaning that DSAT viewers in Thirsk and Harrogate will get YTV whilst terrestrial viewers in the same area are likely to see Tyne Tees from Bilsdale. Is my supposition correct? I think so, a number of N Yorks punters have received a post card from Sky this last week informing them that their ITV 1 region was changing, and Sky+ users would need to reset any ITV 1 recordings. Well I haven't received such a card, but if there has been a mapping change then it's about time. The problem is that post DSO those people in northern Harrogate (i.e. behind the hill) will still have to put up with TTTV on Freeview when most of the town - on Freeview from Emley or on sat - will be watching (the majority preferred) YTV. I wouldn't have thought it was too difficult to radiate a highly directional signal from Bilsdale towards Harrogate (and parts of north Leeds/Wetherby area for that matter) carrying YTV. Oh, I forgot, ITV has got no money...... -- Woody harrogate three at ntlworld dot com |
alteration to Tyne Tess and YTV coverage
"Bill Wright" wrote in message ... On Calendar tonight they welcomed the new viewers thay had gained from Tyne Tees 'as the result of digital mapping'. Presumably this refers to DSAT, meaning that DSAT viewers in Thirsk and Harrogate will get YTV whilst terrestrial viewers in the same area are likely to see Tyne Tees from Bilsdale. Is my supposition correct? Bill This ITV1 mapping is a load of bull****. The viewer should be able to choose which region of ITV1 they want to watch and assign it to 103 themselves. Pity the crappy sky digibox is not flexible enough to do this. Maybe its related to advertising etc, but I never watch any adverts anymore. Fast forward right past them, so the advertisers are wasting their money!!!! I have long since refused to watch bloody adverts on commercial crap channels. |
alteration to Tyne Tess and YTV coverage
Keith wrote:
: This ITV1 mapping is a load of bull****. The viewer should be able to : choose which region of ITV1 they want to watch and assign it to 103 : themselves. Pity the crappy sky digibox is not flexible enough to do this. It's nothing to do with the Sky Digibox! ITV want people to watch the correct adverts and they pay Sky (lots!) of money to set 103 to the region that ITV wish to have. |
alteration to Tyne Tess and YTV coverage
"Brian Mc" wrote in message ... Keith wrote: : This ITV1 mapping is a load of bull****. The viewer should be able to : choose which region of ITV1 they want to watch and assign it to 103 : themselves. Pity the crappy sky digibox is not flexible enough to do this. It's nothing to do with the Sky Digibox! ITV want people to watch the correct adverts and they pay Sky (lots!) of money to set 103 to the region that ITV wish to have. Brian, try reading my post fully before responding. I did actually say it was advert related, but I was right to say that the Sky DodgyBox is crap and is not able to user assign 103 or any other channel for that matter. |
alteration to Tyne Tess and YTV coverage
"Mike Henry" wrote in message ... In , "Keith" wrote: I did actually say it was advert related, but I was right to say that the Sky DodgyBox is crap and is not able to user assign 103 or any other channel for that matter. The fact that it can't do those things is the result of a deliberate policy. You seemed to be implying it was down to poor design, a careless omission; a lack of understanding of what functionality the viewers might want. Actually Sky understand exactly what the viewers want and go out of their way not to provide it - such as the continuing lack of "switch to/from last channel viewed" on the basic Digibox, the single most egregiously missing feature, still not added well over a decade later. They also understand what they and the broadcasters want, and that's a nicely locked down platform where you can't re-order or re-number channels. Look at it from whatever angle you like. I look at things and make a decision as to whether they are any good for me. If Sky want to lock down the system, thats fine. I don't however have to use the system and neither does anyone else if they choose not to. There are many flexible alternatives if people go out and buy them. You are quite correct in your response and that is exactly why I have dumped Sky and their crappy (as far as I am concerned) system. From Skys perspective, its good to be control freaks, from my perspective its a poorly designed system that offers no flexibity (maybe on purpose) and I prefer a more flexible system where I can decide which channels go where. I suppose its a good enough reason for not having a Sky Digibox anymore. |
alteration to Tyne Tess and YTV coverage
"Keith" wrote in message
... "Mike Henry" wrote in message ... In , "Keith" wrote: I did actually say it was advert related, but I was right to say that the Sky DodgyBox is crap and is not able to user assign 103 or any other channel for that matter. The fact that it can't do those things is the result of a deliberate policy. You seemed to be implying it was down to poor design, a careless omission; a lack of understanding of what functionality the viewers might want. Actually Sky understand exactly what the viewers want and go out of their way not to provide it - such as the continuing lack of "switch to/from last channel viewed" on the basic Digibox, the single most egregiously missing feature, still not added well over a decade later. They also understand what they and the broadcasters want, and that's a nicely locked down platform where you can't re-order or re-number channels. Look at it from whatever angle you like. I look at things and make a decision as to whether they are any good for me. If Sky want to lock down the system, thats fine. I don't however have to use the system and neither does anyone else if they choose not to. There are many flexible alternatives if people go out and buy them. You are quite correct in your response and that is exactly why I have dumped Sky and their crappy (as far as I am concerned) system. From Skys perspective, its good to be control freaks, from my perspective its a poorly designed system that offers no flexibity (maybe on purpose) and I prefer a more flexible system where I can decide which channels go where. I suppose its a good enough reason for not having a Sky Digibox anymore. You have missed one salient point. People who contribute to this NG know what (TV technical) life is about but overlook the fact that most Sky users are essentially simple souls. Given the number of such souls it makes good sense for Sky to have a relatively simple system that is the same wherever it operates and that is installed to the same standard (!!) and in the same style thus making life easier for their support people. It would be interesting to see, when given the option of Freesat from Sky or (Freeview-type) Freesat how many opt for the former. At least you get 24/7 free support from Sky - where to you go when you have a problem with your Humax or Grundig Freesat box at 23:30 on Christmas Eve? -- Woody harrogate three at ntlworld dot com |
alteration to Tyne Tess and YTV coverage
In article , Woody wrote:
At least you get 24/7 free support from Sky - where do you go when you have a problem with your Humax or Grundig Freesat box at 23:30 on Christmas Eve? I'd go to bed and stop worrying about it. Rod. -- Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software from http://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com