|
TV license
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:04:07 +0100, "Adrian" wrote:
Stephen Wolstenholme wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:21:51 +0100, "Adrian" wrote: Even more annoying, ITV have started advertising future programmes _during_ current ones. I only discover this after removing the commercial breaks prior to watching. In future no doubt I'll be watching more rented DVDs. Some rented DVD's also carry adverts. There's no escape! Steve But at least they don't overlay the actual programme which some channels have started doing recently. DOGs were just the thin end of the wedge. Ah yes, DOGs. Even some of the BBC channels have started using DOGs. The BBC3 DOG is nearly as intrusive as the commercial channels. DOGs are an insult to viewers intelligence. I tried to watch a recording of a FIVE USA program the other day but gave up after a few minutes. Steve -- Neural Planner Software Ltd www.NPSL1.com |
TV license
Scott wrote:
Understand the manufacturers have to pay TV license to Thomson. Is it still valid of the patent as TV has invented for long time? No. If you are refering to the Telefunken PAL system, _that_ expired in the mid seventies. http://preview.tinyurl.com/bruchs-pal-color-television (radiomuseum.org) In the UK, the users must pay TV license ... (another type of licenxe) -- Adrian C |
TV license
In message , Stephen
Wolstenholme writes On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:04:07 +0100, "Adrian" wrote: Stephen Wolstenholme wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:21:51 +0100, "Adrian" wrote: Even more annoying, ITV have started advertising future programmes _during_ current ones. I only discover this after removing the commercial breaks prior to watching. In future no doubt I'll be watching more rented DVDs. Some rented DVD's also carry adverts. There's no escape! Steve But at least they don't overlay the actual programme which some channels have started doing recently. DOGs were just the thin end of the wedge. Ah yes, DOGs. Even some of the BBC channels have started using DOGs. The BBC3 DOG is nearly as intrusive as the commercial channels. DOGs are an insult to viewers intelligence. I tried to watch a recording of a FIVE USA program the other day but gave up after a few minutes. Steve I've long suspected that after DSO, all of them will have DOG. -- Ian |
TV license
"Adrian C" wrote in message
... Scott wrote: Understand the manufacturers have to pay TV license to Thomson. Is it still valid of the patent as TV has invented for long time? No. If you are refering to the Telefunken PAL system, _that_ expired in the mid seventies. http://preview.tinyurl.com/bruchs-pal-color-television (radiomuseum.org) In the UK, the users must pay TV license ... (another type of licenxe) -- Adrian C For heaven's sake - licenCe!!! -- Woody harrogate three at ntlworld dot com |
TV license
"Woody" wrote in message ... "Adrian C" wrote in message ... Scott wrote: In the UK, the users must pay TV license ... (another type of licenxe) -- Adrian C For heaven's sake - licenCe!!! Now don't go getting incenced about it ;-) Roger R |
TV license
"Mike Tomlinson" wrote in message ... IMO Freeview has been a disaster. Yes, we have digital telly, but with too many channels of complete crap a la the American model. This thing of repeats+1 of repeats (C4+1, More 4, Dave, Dave ja vu) is a joke. [snip] I thought everything American just has to be better and aped here. For many viewers the more channels the better, regardless of content. How many satellite receivers are promoted making a feature of 'receive over X000 channels' as a selling point. It is easy to use the skip/delete channels facility so that only a small selection are ever seen, but I bet the majority of viewers don't do that, instead including all available channels in the list. Roger R |
TV license
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:20:23 +0100, Ian
wrote: I've long suspected that after DSO, all of them will have DOG. The excuse is that there will be so many channels we will need DOGs to know what which channel we are watching! That's why I think DOGs are an insult to our intelligence. Steve -- Neural Planner Software Ltd www.NPSL1.com |
TV license
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:30:44 +0100, Mark Carver
wrote: I've never heard of such a thing. In fact I had a major row on the phone with a chap from the ITC about 12 years ago, when I'd complained to them that C4 were not sending a PDC 'stop' flag until after the ad break, after the programme in question. If I'd set up a recording on say BBC 2 straight after, my VCR would still be locked to C4 until that stop signal, and I'd often have the start of the following BBC prog chopped off. I could understand them wanting you to record the ads during a programme, but why after. Anyway the ITC bloke just would not accept my argument, even when I asked him whether he'd sit through such ads himself ? You couldn't understand that, as a commercial broadcaster, he HAD to prioritise the adverts over the service to you? Any hint of a system that could be used to skip adverts, ANY adverts, would be commercial suicide. Do the BBC send the flag before or after the inter-programme "announcements"? |
TV license
In article ,
Mike Tomlinson wrote: Another bugbear is the way the volume leaps when the adverts start. I keep on reading this - but don't notice it most of the time. Of course it could depend on the channel you're watching. I watched the repeat of Lewis followed by Gunrush on ITV last night - so four hours in all. And it wasn't apparent then. -- *What are the pink bits in my tyres? Cyclists & Joggers* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com