|
Question about Freesat signals
"Steve Terry" wrote in message ... Or for less cost you could put up 2 dishes, each with a quad LNB to give you those 8 outputs Or one dish with an octo LNB. A multiswitch is only worth bothering if you want more outputs or can't put up more than one dish Yes, although there are now some multiswitches that need no local power supply. They get all their power from the receivers. Bill |
Question about Freesat signals
"Bill Wright" wrote in message
... "Steve Terry" wrote in message ... Or for less cost you could put up 2 dishes, each with a quad LNB to give you those 8 outputs Or one dish with an octo LNB. Bloody fiddly sockets thou and more than double the price of a dish and quad LNB A multiswitch is only worth bothering if you want more outputs or can't put up more than one dish Yes, although there are now some multiswitches that need no local power supply. They get all their power from the receivers. Bill That's handy, makes for a simple community aerial system, and getting cheaper all the time Steve Terry |
Question about Freesat signals
"Steve Terry" wrote in message ... "Bill Wright" wrote in message ... "Steve Terry" wrote in message ... Or for less cost you could put up 2 dishes, each with a quad LNB to give you those 8 outputs Or one dish with an octo LNB. Bloody fiddly sockets thou and more than double the price of a dish and quad LNB Yes, they are really only a solution if you are not wanting to fit two dishes. I think they'll get cheaper though. A multiswitch is only worth bothering if you want more outputs or can't put up more than one dish Yes, although there are now some multiswitches that need no local power supply. They get all their power from the receivers. Bill That's handy, makes for a simple community aerial system, and getting cheaper all the time Problem are that for communal systems you still have to earthbond, and of course there's the need to add terrestrial. These switches attenuate terrestrial signals severely. They are really only suitable for one-dwelling systems with no terrestrial. Bill |
Question about Freesat signals
In article ,
Paul Ratcliffe wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:06:18 +0100, Tony wrote: You can't generally mix satellite and terrestrial raw signals on the same cable Of course you can. likely they would interfere. They use completely separate frequency bands. It is not "likely". It is completely unlikely. but remember that the LNB acts as a frequency changer. What is fed from the LNB is at uhf. this could (and has in the past) interfere with terrestrial signals -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.11 |
Question about Freesat signals
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:35:26 +0100, charles
wrote: You can't generally mix satellite and terrestrial raw signals on the same cable Of course you can. likely they would interfere. They use completely separate frequency bands. It is not "likely". It is completely unlikely. but remember that the LNB acts as a frequency changer. What is fed from the LNB is at uhf. this could (and has in the past) interfere with terrestrial signals Yes, you can get out-of-band crap from the LNB but it is not in the normal range of frequencies used for real signals and, as Bill says, the rubbish should be filtered out before combining. |
Supplementary question
Can someone please explain the point of the "loop out" socket on my FTA satellite receiver? Given that the receiver evidently switches the single LNB in my set-up into one of four possible modes, it seems to me that a daisy-chained receiver (say in another room) would only have access to (roughly) one- quarter of the channels, as determined by the first receiver. Would control signals from the second receiver be sent back through the loop connection and change the mode of the LNB? Can the "loop out" serve any useful purpose? -- John Legon |
Supplementary question
On 23/08/09 10:37, John Legon wrote:
Can someone please explain the point of the "loop out" socket on my FTA satellite receiver? Allows another satellite receiver to be used (e.g. in a bedroom) so long as the one with "loop out" is switched off. |
Question about Freesat signals
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:05:53 +0100, "R. Mark Clayton"
wrote: "Peter Duncanson" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:28:54 +0100, ChrisW wrote: I am confused about satellite TV signals. With DTT I feed the signal from one aerial into a distribution amplifier and the signal and all channels are then available to any of the amps distribution points. I am told that for satellite one needs a separate LNB for each TV set - dual and quad LNBs seem to be common. I was planning to feed a single Freesat signal into the Sat input of a suitable distribution amp and was expecting the Freesat signal to be available at all distribution points and to be available wherever I had a suitable decoder. In what way is my understanding wrong? Is it that only one channel at a time is available on any one LNB? If this is the case, would that same channel be available on any decoder in the setup? How can one combine Freesat signals with DTT in a home distribution system? Two tricks are used to maximise the bandwidth from the satellite two your dish. 1. There are two bands of ~1GHz each. These are mixed down to a single band between ~1GHz and 2Ghz (which is about the limit of what you can get down a cable). 2. The signals are sent in horizontal and vertical polarity, without the polarity the channels would overlap somewhat and you would get adjacent channel inteference. Only one polarity can be sent down the wire at once. Essentially the receiver tells the LNB which band and polarity it wants (by volts and tones). In a multi-switch all four are sent from the dish to the switch and the selection is made inside the switch. Have a butcher's on Wiki. The way to do it is with a Multiswitch fed by a Quattro LNB. Note "quattro" not "quad". Depends on your switch - the latest EMP Centauri can cope with either. Emerging technology is going to use fibre to send the whole lot down a single fibre. I think it's already emerged: http://www.triax.co.uk/Products/Fibr...cal%20LNB.aspx Apparently quite expensive at the moment -- Cheers Peter |
Question about Freesat signals
snip
Emerging technology is going to use fibre to send the whole lot down a single fibre. I think it's already emerged: http://www.triax.co.uk/Products/Fibr...cal%20LNB.aspx Well I would say it was still emerging. Apparently quite expensive at the moment Not half, but expect this to change and to be able to cascade the LNB's. -- Cheers Peter |
Question about Freesat signals
"Bill Wright" wrote in message ... "Steve Terry" wrote in message ... Or for less cost you could put up 2 dishes, each with a quad LNB to give you those 8 outputs Or one dish with an octo LNB. A multiswitch is only worth bothering if you want more outputs or can't put up more than one dish Yes, although there are now some multiswitches that need no local power supply. They get all their power from the receivers. Bill That is pushing - if only one receiver is on (or configured to provide LNB power in standby) then you have to power the switch and any LNB in use down one cable... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com