|
Plasma TVs and burn-in
Perhaps it does, but "I'm going home to watch choose a name obviously
calculated to impress" is the last thing on earth actually likely to impress, certainly in my case at least! On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:56:53 +0100, "John" wrote: I am going to watch my Plasma sounds better than going home to watch my LCD. ====================================== Please always reply to news group as the email address in this post's header does not exist. Alternatively, use one of the contact addresses at: http://www.macfh.co.uk/JavaJive/JavaJive.html http://www.macfh.co.uk/Macfarlane/Macfarlane.html |
Plasma TVs and burn-in
"Java Jive" wrote in message ... A doubly senior moment perhaps :-) On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:55:01 +0100, "Graham." wrote: It's far from a myth Bob, it's the most impotent negative attribute of these PDPs. Yes I know, I know! Freudian slip. Bill |
Plasma TVs and burn-in
"John" wrote in message ... Plasma sounds sexy! I am going to watch my Plasma sounds better than going home to watch my LCD. How very shallow! Bill |
Plasma TVs and burn-in
"Clive" wrote in message ... I wouldn't bother with power hungry and OLD technology such as Plasma. Tell your mate to get a new LED Samsung TV. Pictures are far better than LCD and way better than Plasma. Why buy a 10 year old TV! You do get burn-in on Plasma, especially on channels with DOGS, that's why people hate them. you've fallen for the marketing hype then - the current so called LED televisions are actually still LCD televisions - it's the light source that's LED only. -- Gareth. that fly...... is your magic wand.... |
Plasma TVs and burn-in
In article ,
Clive wrote: I wouldn't bother with power hungry and OLD technology such as Plasma. Tell your mate to get a new LED Samsung TV. Pictures are far better than LCD and way better than Plasma. Err, the Samsung 'LED' set is still an LCD. And the pictures aren't universally 'better' than other LCD displays. -- *The first rule of holes: If you are in one, stop digging! Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Plasma TVs and burn-in
On Jul 20, 11:49*pm, "Clive" wrote:
"Dhropta Guli" wrote in message ... Do plasma tellies suffer from burn-in or is that an urban myth? *A mate of mine really really fancies a plasma to replace his old crt set. Problem is he has a number of cctv cameras around his garden used for watching the wildlife that visits. *These cameras are on rather more than any of the broadcast programmes via a box which gives him a grid of 8 pictures. Would he be risking it a bit with a plasma and if so how long does burn-in take to happen, months or years? Mines an LCD set so I can't really help him. Bob I wouldn't bother with power hungry and OLD technology such as Plasma. Tell your mate to get a new LED Samsung TV. *Pictures are far better than LCD and way better than Plasma. *Why buy a 10 year old TV! You do get burn-in on Plasma, especially on channels with DOGS, that's why people hate them. LED = LCD with an array of backlit LEDs. NOT an oLED TV. Now sit the LED side by side with a good plasma and tell me which is better on a viewing basis not because it has the letters LED in its name. You do get burn in on LCD too. I know this as I work on ATMs which have LCD screens and yes, they too can suffer from screen burn. Who are these people that hate Plasmas? I don't hate mine, in fact I wouldn't part with it for the latest multi Hertz 1080p thingy. |
Plasma TVs and burn-in
"Clive" wrote in message ...
"Dhropta Guli" wrote in message ... Do plasma tellies suffer from burn-in or is that an urban myth? A mate of mine really really fancies a plasma to replace his old crt set. Problem is he has a number of cctv cameras around his garden used for watching the wildlife that visits. These cameras are on rather more than any of the broadcast programmes via a box which gives him a grid of 8 pictures. Would he be risking it a bit with a plasma and if so how long does burn-in take to happen, months or years? Mines an LCD set so I can't really help him. Bob I wouldn't bother with power hungry and OLD technology such as Plasma. Tell your mate to get a new LED Samsung TV. Pictures are far better than LCD and way better than Plasma. Why buy a 10 year old TV! The "LED" refers to the backlight. Other than that it's a normal LCD set -- Alex "I laugh in the face of danger , then I hide until it goes away" |
Plasma TVs and burn-in
nospam wrote:
"Clive" wrote: I wouldn't bother with power hungry and OLD technology such as Plasma. Tell your mate to get a new LED Samsung TV. Pictures are far better than LCD and way better than Plasma. Samsung 'LED' TVs are LCD. The rest of your comments are similarly accurate. That's cos "Clive" is the Tiscali Idiot. That's right -- this groups *other* personality disordered poster. By the way, the latest LED TVs are "Edge LED" backlit. http://asia.cnet.com/reviews/home_av...2053016,00.htm |
Plasma TVs and burn-in
In article , The dog from that film
you saw wrote: you've fallen for the marketing hype then - the current so called LED televisions are actually still LCD televisions - it's the light source that's LED only. It's not marketing hype to say that LED screens are thinner, lighter and consume less electrical power. A quick examination of the facts will reveal all these things to be true. As for what to call them, the light source is the thing that is notably different about them, and "LED display" is less of a mouthfull than "LCD display with LED backlight. Rod. -- Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software from http://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com