|
Tories propose 80 local TV stations
"Chris" wrote in message
... According to today's Times, the tories would introduce local TV stations to 80 towns and cities after 2012. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle6715236.ece I assume the 2012 date is something to do with the end of digital switchover but I still don't see how it would work. Terrestrial TV will still come from a limited number if sites that are not city-specific. I guess you could add some new local transmitters but they would need to transmit their own local multiplex on an additional frequency and nobody's aerial would be pointing at them anyway. Maybe the new service would be internet based and we would use media players and mobile phones to watch. Is this just another example of politicians spouting with no knowledge of the subject? Chris As usual Solent TV on Astra/eurobird 28e was as local as it gets If you are going to have local TV, 28e is the place to put them local terrestrial muxs would cost a fortune Steve Terry |
Tories propose 80 local TV stations
"Chris" wrote in message ... Mark Carver wrote: Chris wrote: According to today's Times, the tories would introduce local TV stations to 80 towns and cities after 2012. The above envisages terrestrial broadcasting, but... About a year ago the CEO of Eutelsat was interviewed on some Italian satellite TV channel or other. Describing future developments he said they were working towards being able to so tightly focus a transponder that it could be focussed on a single city. Not heard anything more on this development - so far. Roger |
Tories propose 80 local TV stations
In article , Roger R
wrote: "Chris" wrote in message ... Mark Carver wrote: Chris wrote: According to today's Times, the tories would introduce local TV stations to 80 towns and cities after 2012. The above envisages terrestrial broadcasting, but... About a year ago the CEO of Eutelsat was interviewed on some Italian satellite TV channel or other. Describing future developments he said they were working towards being able to so tightly focus a transponder that it could be focussed on a single city. Not heard anything more on this development - so far. It wouldn't be just having very narrow beam width, it would mean keeping the position of the satellite to a very tight accuracy. Imagine a fraction of a degree variation giving Derby signals meant for Nottingham - the riots that would ensue .... -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.11 |
Tories propose 80 local TV stations
"Mark Carver" wrote in message ... Chris wrote: According to today's Times, the tories would introduce local TV stations to 80 towns and cities after 2012. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle6715236.ece I assume the 2012 date is something to do with the end of digital switchover but I still don't see how it would work. Terrestrial TV will still come from a limited number if sites that are not city-specific. I guess you could add some new local transmitters but they would need to transmit their own local multiplex on an additional frequency and nobody's aerial would be pointing at them anyway. Ofcom have wasted (IMHO) loads of our money devising frequency plans to cater for this mad (IMHO) plan. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/cond...eaved/summary/ depends what they do with the channel i suppose - i kind of like the idea of a local channel that lets local people present bits on subjects that they think are important even if they are bizarre to us. a bit like the american local access cable channels. -- Gareth. that fly...... is your magic wand.... |
Tories propose 80 local TV stations
In article , The dog from that film you
saw wrote: "Mark Carver" wrote in message ... Chris wrote: According to today's Times, the tories would introduce local TV stations to 80 towns and cities after 2012. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle6715236.ece I assume the 2012 date is something to do with the end of digital switchover but I still don't see how it would work. Terrestrial TV will still come from a limited number if sites that are not city-specific. I guess you could add some new local transmitters but they would need to transmit their own local multiplex on an additional frequency and nobody's aerial would be pointing at them anyway. Ofcom have wasted (IMHO) loads of our money devising frequency plans to cater for this mad (IMHO) plan. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/cond...eaved/summary/ depends what they do with the channel i suppose - i kind of like the idea of a local channel that lets local people present bits on subjects that they think are important even if they are bizarre to us. a bit like the american local access cable channels. or even Channel tv ;-) -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.11 |
Tories propose 80 local TV stations
charles wrote:
In article , The dog from that film you depends what they do with the channel i suppose - i kind of like the idea of a local channel that lets local people present bits on subjects that they think are important even if they are bizarre to us. a bit like the american local access cable channels. or even Channel tv ;-) Which only survives because it has ITV 1 network programming to sustain the other 23 hours a day of its output. That network programming is supplied at very cheap rate, because Channel's potential audience is tiny. National advertising is also sold on their behalf by ITV Ltd. All of that is a remaining legacy from the IBA regulator days. I'm surprised Ofcom haven't waded in yet, and destroyed that rather quaint arrangement. Stations like the IOW's Solent TV failed partly because they could only sustain output by rebroadcasting Sky News and QVC, or repeating their own local programmes ad infinitum, and had to sell all advertising space by themselves. -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. www.paras.org.uk |
Tories propose 80 local TV stations
Mark Carver wrote:
charles wrote: In article , The dog from that film you depends what they do with the channel i suppose - i kind of like the idea of a local channel that lets local people present bits on subjects that they think are important even if they are bizarre to us. a bit like the american local access cable channels. or even Channel tv ;-) Which only survives because it has ITV 1 network programming to sustain the other 23 hours a day of its output. That network programming is supplied at very cheap rate, because Channel's potential audience is tiny. National advertising is also sold on their behalf by ITV Ltd. All of that is a remaining legacy from the IBA regulator days. I'm surprised Ofcom haven't waded in yet, and destroyed that rather quaint arrangement. Stations like the IOW's Solent TV failed partly because they could only sustain output by rebroadcasting Sky News and QVC, or repeating their own local programmes ad infinitum, and had to sell all advertising space by themselves. Would a consortium of 80 channels have enough resources to make a go of it? -- Chris |
Tories propose 80 local TV stations
"Chris Youlden" wrote in message ... Would a consortium of 80 channels have enough resources to make a go of it? maybe they would be government funded, one small studio with 5 staff affairs. -- Gareth. that fly...... is your magic wand.... |
Tories propose 80 local TV stations
In article ,
The dog from that film you saw wrote: Would a consortium of 80 channels have enough resources to make a go of it? maybe they would be government funded, one small studio with 5 staff affairs. Think the taxi bill for interviewing local dignitaries might be quite large... -- Is the hardness of the butter proportional to the softness of the bread?* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Tories propose 80 local TV stations
Chris Youlden wrote:
Would a consortium of 80 channels have enough resources to make a go of it? That in effect would be like reinventing the ITV network, but in 80 rather than 15 areas. The problem as I see it, is that Ofcom/government have created a broadcasting environment where the regional ITV of old is no longer sustainable. I don't think ITV have helped themselves by making some rather poor decisions in recent years, but the fact remains that commercially funded local broadcasting doesn't seem to work any more (look at what's happened to radio as well). -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. www.paras.org.uk |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com