Waltham
 

The lost stations after several attempts to re-tune a

3
4
6
8
10
13
14

Is there a common theme?

Waltham
 

"John" wrote:

The lost stations after several attempts to re-tune a

3
4
6
8
10
13
14

Is there a common theme?

Yes, those are on Mux 2, which is on Waltham's UHF channel 23.

--
Dave Farrance

Waltham
 

"Dave Farrance" wrote in message
...
"John" wrote:

The lost stations after several attempts to re-tune a

3
4
6
8
10
13
14

Is there a common theme?

Yes, those are on Mux 2, which is on Waltham's UHF channel 23.

--
Dave Farrance

Got them back after a further re-tune - but the signals are weaker than the
others. Any suggestions?

Waltham
 

On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 21:09:18 +0100, "John"
wrote:

Amazing site - congratulations.

For some reason I missed this earlier, thanks for the compliment.
Sorry you're still having problems.

======================================

Please always reply to news group as the email address in
this post's header does not exist. Alternatively, use one of the
contact addresses at:
http://www.macfh.co.uk/JavaJive/JavaJive.html
http://www.macfh.co.uk/Macfarlane/Macfarlane.html

Waltham
 

John wrote:

Got them back after a further re-tune - but the signals are weaker than the
others. Any suggestions?

We need to clear up how well your aerial is performing at the lower end of the
band, as I asked in my other post, the quality of C5 analogue (Ch 35) compared
against the other four analogues (Ch 54,58,61,64) might provide some clues.
The evidence you have presented certainly points to a problem at the lower end
of the band.

--
Mark
Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply.

www.paras.org.uk

Waltham
 

I had forgotten how poor normal analogue is - fortunately BBC2 and Ch5 were
both showing the same Jackson Tribute - Ch5 was slightly worse.

On the crude scale on the info display BBC 1 is at Max signal - ITV is at
about 10% of scale.
"Mark Carver" wrote in message
...
John wrote:

Got them back after a further re-tune - but the signals are weaker than
the others. Any suggestions?

We need to clear up how well your aerial is performing at the lower end of
the band, as I asked in my other post, the quality of C5 analogue (Ch 35)
compared against the other four analogues (Ch 54,58,61,64) might provide
some clues. The evidence you have presented certainly points to a problem
at the lower end of the band.

--
Mark
Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply.

www.paras.org.uk