|
|
HDMI
"Dr Zoidberg" wrote in message ... "David" wrote in message SCART will disappear at around the same time SD disappears. Well never then. Of course it will at some point. Are there any 405 line TVs left? I'm not sure that it's a valid parallel. In those days TV standards were dictated entirely by broadcast. There was no domestic recording and very little CCTV. SD could continue side by side with HD for many years. Bill |
HDMI
On Jan 29, 10:19*pm, Roderick Stewart
Most of the programmes are crap anyway; would HDMI make them look any better? Rod. -- Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software fromhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/ LOL, I'm glad it's not just me that thinks like that! Rubbish is still rubbish, even with 10x as many pixels. |
HDMI
"Bill Wright" wrote in message ... "Dr Zoidberg" wrote in message ... "David" wrote in message SCART will disappear at around the same time SD disappears. Well never then. Of course it will at some point. Are there any 405 line TVs left? I'm not sure that it's a valid parallel. In those days TV standards were dictated entirely by broadcast. There was no domestic recording and very little CCTV. SD could continue side by side with HD for many years. Bill I have been saying for years that technology seems to go backwards.. I was doing VoIP about 12 years ago, but now it's gone mainstream and the software that's out there isnt as good as it was 12 years ago. Video has done the same thing, we get HDTV and what happens, UTube explodes and people enjoy watching .25SD content.. When i thought tech couldnt go in reverse any more, it turns out people are watching UTube video's on their 2 1/2" mobile phones!.. So yes, SD will be here for Yonks and Yonks. |
HDMI
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:48:10 +0000, Bill Wright wrote:
I think SD will be here for a very long time. Yes, SD and sub-standard SD will always be transmitted because of bandwidth restraints and associated costs. However, that does not mean that transfer of such video signals will not be still possible via SCART, but will most probably only be possible by an super secure DRM infested HDCP encrusted Macrovision (tm) protected digital link for which you have inserted your paid up subscription chip card to prove that you have viewing rights. |
HDMI
"mr deo" wrote in message om... I have been saying for years that technology seems to go backwards.. I was doing VoIP about 12 years ago, but now it's gone mainstream and the software that's out there isnt as good as it was 12 years ago. Video has done the same thing, we get HDTV and what happens, UTube explodes and people enjoy watching .25SD content.. When i thought tech couldnt go in reverse any more, it turns out people are watching UTube video's on their 2 1/2" mobile phones!.. So yes, SD will be here for Yonks and Yonks. except that HD material can now be viewed on youtube. maybe not the same bitrate as broadcast tv, but still HD. -- Gareth. that fly...... is your magic wand.... |
HDMI
"The dog from that film you saw" wrote in message ... "mr deo" wrote in message om... I have been saying for years that technology seems to go backwards.. I was doing VoIP about 12 years ago, but now it's gone mainstream and the software that's out there isnt as good as it was 12 years ago. Video has done the same thing, we get HDTV and what happens, UTube explodes and people enjoy watching .25SD content.. When i thought tech couldnt go in reverse any more, it turns out people are watching UTube video's on their 2 1/2" mobile phones!.. So yes, SD will be here for Yonks and Yonks. except that HD material can now be viewed on youtube. maybe not the same bitrate as broadcast tv, but still HD. -- Gareth. that fly...... is your magic wand.... Yea, I had a guy telling me a few weeks ago that VM should be giving us all the HD stations, after all we can rent HD movies online and all that jazz.. But the online version of HD doesnt seem to be regulated, and the quality is often less than SD broadcast ;( .. |
HDMI
"J G Miller" wrote in message ... On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:48:10 +0000, Bill Wright wrote: I think SD will be here for a very long time. Yes, SD and sub-standard SD will always be transmitted because of bandwidth restraints and associated costs. However, that does not mean that transfer of such video signals will not be still possible via SCART, but will most probably only be possible by an super secure DRM infested HDCP encrusted Macrovision (tm) protected digital link for which you have inserted your paid up subscription chip card to prove that you have viewing rights. If you can see the content with your eyes, then there will be some way of recording it. Even if it's by pointing an 18fps hand-cranked movie camera at the screen. (All this modern stuff is a right pain to use. A few weeks ago I came across an old table-top17" TV. There were 5 channel buttons on the front, and when I pressed one the channel changed instantly! What luxury! At home, what with fiddling with an unresponsive remote and waiting for the TV or box to change the channel in it's own time, I soon get fed up.) -- Bartc |
HDMI
Bartc wrote:
If you can see the content with your eyes, then there will be some way of recording it. Even if it's by pointing an 18fps hand-cranked movie camera at the screen. The assumption is that you will pay to get a full quality version, and not be happy with the reduced picture quality you can get through an unencrypted SD output or filming the screen. Did someone say "youtube"? Andy |
HDMI
Bartc wrote:
"J G Miller" wrote in message ... On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:48:10 +0000, Bill Wright wrote: I think SD will be here for a very long time. Yes, SD and sub-standard SD will always be transmitted because of bandwidth restraints and associated costs. However, that does not mean that transfer of such video signals will not be still possible via SCART, but will most probably only be possible by an super secure DRM infested HDCP encrusted Macrovision (tm) protected digital link for which you have inserted your paid up subscription chip card to prove that you have viewing rights. If you can see the content with your eyes, then there will be some way of recording it. Even if it's by pointing an 18fps hand-cranked movie camera at the screen. (All this modern stuff is a right pain to use. A few weeks ago I came across an old table-top17" TV. There were 5 channel buttons on the front, and when I pressed one the channel changed instantly! What luxury! At home, what with fiddling with an unresponsive remote and waiting for the TV or box to change the channel in it's own time, I soon get fed up.) I remember when I was about 10 my Grandparents had a TV with proximity type buttons (or very light touch anyway), you could run your finger up and down the 3 channels and it would change picture as fast as you could move your finger, oh the luxury! -- Tony |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:25 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com