|
The Neighbours
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:19:31 +0100, Terry Casey wrote:
I think you are possibly directionally dyslectic! Probably -- I had incorrectly thought that the rooftop antenna pointing at Crystal Palace was pointing in a south west direction. So, using that as a point of reference, in which direction, is it pointing? Remember Sir, that you have the advantage of being familiar with the local terrain, and some of us are only seeing these photographs without that advantage. |
The Neighbours
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:51:47 +0100, Terry Casey wrote:
http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/i...tv/neighbours/ cru3.jpg In this photograph, the satellite dish is presumably pointing South East towards Astra 28.2? The wall height antenna appears to be pointing in the same direction South East? The rooftop antennas are therefore pointing south west to Crystal palace? YES / NO ? |
The Neighbours
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:06:02 +0200, J G Miller wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:19:31 +0100, Terry Casey wrote: I think you are possibly directionally dyslectic! Probably -- I had incorrectly thought that the rooftop antenna pointing at Crystal Palace was pointing in a south west direction. So, using that as a point of reference, in which direction, is it pointing? Remember Sir, that you have the advantage of being familiar with the local terrain, and some of us are only seeing these photographs without that advantage. Inside the neighbours' house: A: Have you noticed the man next door taking photos of our house and garden? B: Yes. He seems to be fascinated by aerials. A: So he does. I have a spare aerial. B: Why don't you put it up and point it in a random direction. A: [chuckle] That should give him something to think about. |
The Neighbours
In article ,
J G Miller wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:47:51 +0100, charles wrote: Hannington? It appeared that the antenna was pointing east, so that would rule out Hannington, unless they are trying to receive it through the back end of the antenna, which does sometimes work in areas of strong signal. or is it re-transmitting a signal recieved from a satellite on towards a neighbour? Would they not require a transmitting licence to do that? ;+) since when have people bothered to try and get one? There was a Coral shop in Shepherds Bush that did it. -- From KT24 - in "Leafy Surrey" Using a RISC OS computer running v5.11 |
The Neighbours
What people require and what people actually do are often not related in
fact. I've done some tests in years gone by and its surprisingly easy to move uhf signals around this way, though a little limited as only one channel can be done unless you get some very complicated gear. Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ "J G Miller" wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:47:51 +0100, charles wrote: Hannington? It appeared that the antenna was pointing east, so that would rule out Hannington, unless they are trying to receive it through the back end of the antenna, which does sometimes work in areas of strong signal. or is it re-transmitting a signal recieved from a satellite on towards a neighbour? Would they not require a transmitting licence to do that? ;+) |
The Neighbours
J G Miller wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:51:47 +0100, Terry Casey wrote: http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/i...tv/neighbours/ cru3.jpg In this photograph, the satellite dish is presumably pointing South East towards Astra 28.2? The wall height antenna appears to be pointing in the same direction South East? The rooftop antennas are therefore pointing south west to Crystal palace? YES / NO ? YES Also, if you look above the wall height antenna, you can see an Astra above it. Terry |
The Neighbours
Peter Duncanson wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:06:02 +0200, J G Miller wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:19:31 +0100, Terry Casey wrote: I think you are possibly directionally dyslectic! Probably -- I had incorrectly thought that the rooftop antenna pointing at Crystal Palace was pointing in a south west direction. So, using that as a point of reference, in which direction, is it pointing? Remember Sir, that you have the advantage of being familiar with the local terrain, and some of us are only seeing these photographs without that advantage. Inside the neighbours' house: A: Have you noticed the man next door taking photos of our house and garden? B: Yes. He seems to be fascinated by aerials. A: So he does. I have a spare aerial. B: Why don't you put it up and point it in a random direction. A: [chuckle] That should give him something to think about. Good try! However, I noticed this aerial BEFORE I started taking any of the photographs ... Terry |
The Neighbours
J G Miller wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:19:31 +0100, Terry Casey wrote: I think you are possibly directionally dyslectic! Probably -- I had incorrectly thought that the rooftop antenna pointing at Crystal Palace was pointing in a south west direction. So, using that as a point of reference, in which direction, is it pointing? I think you've covered this yourself in a later posting. However, you have far more than the photographs to go on - I had stated that the bearing to CP is 214° EGN and Astra is going to be reasonably constant for the purposes of this discussion, giving a difference of 66° between the two. I had also said that the road "road runs virtually north/south" so you had plenty of information to go on. Remember Sir, that you have the advantage of being familiar with the local terrain, and some of us are only seeing these photographs without that advantage. If the local terrain was a significant factor, I would have mentioned it but, for the record, for the purposes of this discussion, it is sensibly flat with no major man made obstructions (although that is about to change, unfortunately.) Terry |
The Neighbours
In article ,
Terry Casey wrote: If the local terrain was a significant factor, I would have mentioned it but, for the record, for the purposes of this discussion, it is sensibly flat with no major man made obstructions (although that is about to change, unfortunately.) You're not saying more people actually want to live there? ;-) -- *On the seventh day He brewed beer * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com