|
Customer smashes SIX display TVs in shop
"Peter Duncanson" wrote in message ... Bill, I live in Northern Ireland and I can tell you that about twenty years ago a few people here were looking at Britain and expressing those same fears. They could see this division occurring and could see the risks based on their own experience. They didn't speak up because they knew that no one would listen. What many decent people do not understand is that sometimes dangerous divisions can arise even when everyone on all sides is benign and well-intentioned. Let's hope that the powers-that-be are prepared to invest heavily in whatever it takes to avert this social catastrophe. Anyway, back to watching the sleepers in the BB house! I watch the motorway. Bill |
Customer smashes SIX display TVs in shop
Yes, and they run a very helpful charity called The Persula Foundation as
well... Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ "David" wrote in message ... "Kay Robinson" wrote in message ... On Tue, 20 May 2008 23:15:44 +0100, "D Mac" sharpened a new quill and scratched: After paying 360quid insurance for the set This seems rather excessive. Why-oh-why do people pay this much My next door neighbour went to Richer Sounds on Saturday for new TV extended warranty was 10% extra. Also the TV was £70 less than the retail sheds. -- Regards, David Please reply to News Group |
Customer smashes SIX display TVs in shop
The thing to look for is who is underwriting these deals. Often, as hs been
noted recently by the demise of set top boxes, the sale of goods act is of no use in real terms. If its underwritten by a good insurance company and its expected to be a lasting item, then get the warrenty. I'd not suggest it on tvs though as in the current climate the whole format may change next week and leave everyone up the junction... Cynical comment... Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ "Angela" wrote in message ... "David" wrote in message ... | | | "Kay Robinson" wrote in message | ... | On Tue, 20 May 2008 23:15:44 +0100, "D Mac" | sharpened a new quill and scratched: | | After paying 360quid insurance for the set | | This seems rather excessive. Why-oh-why do people pay this much | | My next door neighbour went to Richer Sounds on Saturday for new TV extended | warranty was 10% extra. | Also the TV was £70 less than the retail sheds. why buy extended warranty when you are covered by the sale of goods act for up to 6 years? |
Customer smashes SIX display TVs in shop
"Mike Henry" wrote in message ... In , "David" wrote: "Kay Robinson" wrote in message ... On Tue, 20 May 2008 23:15:44 +0100, "D Mac" sharpened a new quill and scratched: After paying 360quid insurance for the set This seems rather excessive. Why-oh-why do people pay this much My next door neighbour went to Richer Sounds on Saturday for new TV extended warranty was 10% extra. Richer Sounds extended warranties are in a different league from most of the high street rip-offs and so deserve special praise. You can claim back the entire cost of the extended warranty at the end of the period if you haven't used it! (That used to be the case anyway) Also the TV was £70 less than the retail sheds. Another point in their favour. I wish I'd have looked at their website a few weeks ago when I purchased my 37 inch Philips LCD TV, John Lewis online wanted £599 which included a five year warranty, Makro were selling the same model in store for £399.99 (with VAT £470) yet still wanted an extra £130 for an additional four year extended warranty. After seeing them mentioned here, out of curiosity I decided to check out Richer Sounds only to find that they are selling the same TV for £399 'inc VAT' or £439.90 with a full five year warranty!.. so much for 'so called' trade outlets such as Makro, we live and learn! |
Customer smashes SIX display TVs in shop
Angela wrote:
"David" wrote in message ... | | | "Kay Robinson" wrote in message | ... | On Tue, 20 May 2008 23:15:44 +0100, "D Mac" | sharpened a new quill and scratched: | | After paying 360quid insurance for the set | | This seems rather excessive. Why-oh-why do people pay this much | | My next door neighbour went to Richer Sounds on Saturday for new TV extended | warranty was 10% extra. | Also the TV was £70 less than the retail sheds. why buy extended warranty when you are covered by the sale of goods act for up to 6 years? I agree in principle, and do not take out insurance myself on the basis that they are making money from you, it is cheaper to fund your own insurance across all your items, for things like TVs/kitchen appliance you can easily afford to replace these from the money you save unless you get flooded or something. Car insurance is mandatory and cars do come with a high risk so it is fair. However the SOG act only covers 'defects inherant at the time of sale' this means design defects or early failure due to under rated components. The onus is on the consumer to prove their case after the product is 6 months old. It is relatively hard/expensive to prove and they can provide only a partial refund if you have had significant use of the product. In practice most people do not bother claiming and retailers rely on this and are prepared to goto court and lose as the number of payouts are usually small. The SOG act is very weak and, I believe, does not promote long lasting quality products. As a result fewer and fewer manufacturers actually test their products properly before comming to market. Brand names are pretty meaningless, and things are so cheap that many people don't even bother bringing stuff back within the warranty period. -- Tony |
Customer smashes SIX display TVs in shop
"Bill Wright" wrote in message ... "Steve Terry" wrote in message ... "Ivan" wrote in message One way to regain your lost longer warranty and rights, is to join the quarter of a million Brits who are now migrating every single year. This is one factor. Here's another. Given the higher birthrate of some immigrant groups compared to the indigenous population, and given the reluctance of some members of the same groups to integrate and become part of British society, it seems that we will have a great deal of civil strife in the years to come. I do wish we could all get on and live happily together, but I fear a Northern Ireland-type situation on the UK mainland within thirty years. I can see the resentment of the indigenous population (including the Poles who settles here in 1946!) reaching levels where trouble will break out. The white working classes are already rife with race hatred and tales of anti-white discrimination by the authorities. Please tell me my fears are unjustified. Seems to me that the government is at long last beginning to formulate a similar Point of view, unfortunately the horse bolted decades ago and no amount of introducing police state legislation with ID cards and DNA databases is ever going to get him back inside the stable!. 'It's like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre'. |
Customer smashes SIX display TVs in shop
"Kay Robinson" wrote in message ... As you are unlikely to be around Don't count your chickens. I could live longer than you. You might not be here this time next year. then I can assure you your fears are totally unjustified. My fears are for future generations, not for myself. Only if you and your kind can create a new race of dinasours like yourself to carry your racist ideals on to further generations is that scenario ever likely. My father thought as you do, father to nine but he died alone, was cremated alone and has no memorial. Your family must be lacking in forgiveness and humility. Perhaps the way you treated your father -- showing high principle but no compassion -- is symptomatic of a mindset which caused you to react so badly to my reasoned post. Without stopping to consider whether my comments represented a valid viewpoint your highly principled but blind pavlovian response was to scream 'racist!'. So I'm a racist? My post expressed fears for everyone, not for any one section of society. You do anti-racism a great disservice by accusing someone who attempts to have a sensible dialogue about social problems of being racist. Don't you see that what I was saying was that we (all of us) need to look at the danger of social unrest and act now? Why do you want to stifle debate? What have you to fear? Many of those in the US in the 1950s who expressed concern about the future were black -- were they racist? I dispair that we will ever make progress with this when people have your attitude. Bill |
Customer smashes SIX display TVs in shop
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:10:28 +0100, Bill Wright wrote:
it seems that we will have a great deal of civil strife in the years to come. Do you like the Roman, seem to see "the River Tiber foaming with much blood"??????????????????????????? I can see the resentment of the indigenous population However the people of the Upper Parliament Street district of Liverpool showed in 1984 that people of all races can join together to riot and loot, rather than attacking each other. |
Customer smashes SIX display TVs in shop
On 26 Aug, 17:38, Kay Robinson wrote:
You have no idea of what my attitude is, only that I am vehemently against Fascist ideals. Not wanting to stir anything up more than it is, you can't seriously say: "You have no idea of what my attitude is, only that I am vehemently against Fascist ideals." after telling Bill "If you don't wish to be included in the derisive comments and accusations they get then you must learn to think carefully before allowing words and opinions that can be based on such hated principles to spew from your posts." Bill hasn't said anything controversial, and if you seriously believe he has, then you probably should investigate what real racism does to people and their families, and how it is propagated. I speak from first hand experience. All you have done so far, Kay, is to recycle someone else's tired, ill thought out, pseudo-PC platitudes which do nothing other than highlight your own naivety regarding the subject. I to have a dislike for all things fascist, but at least I have a keen eye for spotting them, rather than a reactionary tic to tabloid key-words. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com