HomeCinemaBanter

HomeCinemaBanter (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/index.php)
-   UK digital tv (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Terrestrial Television transmissions and CO^2 emissions. (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/showthread.php?t=55405)

Roderick Stewart December 18th 07 12:58 AM

Terrestrial Television transmissions and CO^2 emissions.
 
In article , Robert Wilson wrote:
A satellite is completely self sufficient, being solar or Pu powered.

Opinions?


Doesn't it also need to carry a supply of chemical fuel or gas for its
manoeuvreing thrusters? Satellites don't just stay perfectly positioned
for ever; they need adjustment from time to time. This alone must mean
they have a finite life, unless somebody can devise a means of sending
up a refill, but I suspect the refill-to-replacement ratio is probably
even worse than for inkjet printers.

Rod.



Robert Wilson[_2_] December 18th 07 10:00 AM

Terrestrial Television transmissions and CO^2 emissions.
 
Roderick Stewart wrote:
In article , Robert Wilson wrote:
A satellite is completely self sufficient, being solar or Pu powered.

Opinions?


Doesn't it also need to carry a supply of chemical fuel or gas for its
manoeuvreing thrusters? Satellites don't just stay perfectly positioned
for ever; they need adjustment from time to time. This alone must mean
they have a finite life, unless somebody can devise a means of sending
up a refill, but I suspect the refill-to-replacement ratio is probably
even worse than for inkjet printers.

Rod.


I had'nt thought of that one. It would be fun of someone with knowledge
of these things could do some conrete number for us to compare.

Regards,

Rob.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com