|
|
Looking for 23 inch LCD
"Dr Hfuhruhurr" wrote in message ... On 12 Dec, 14:13, "Agamemnon" wrote: "CS" wrote in message ... On 11 Dec, 21:28, "Agamemnon" wrote: The picture on every LCD I have seen in the shops under 42 inches looks completely crap and is unwatchable unless you are positioned dead centre, and the tiny speakers on them are just as bad. The technology they use is a decade old and not comparable to the more modern technology in the large screen panels. Those comments belong back in 12th century BC and are just as mythical. You are an idiot. 42 inch panels have viewing angles of 178 degrees whereas you're lucky to get 120 degrees on anything smaller except a very expensive computer display. The same for response times. The technology they use on panels under 42 inches decade out of date. Sony 32" 178 degrees Adequate static picture from most angles you are likely to have chairs stationed. Sony 26" 160 Sony 20" 160 Unwatchable static picture unless you are positioned DEAD CENTRE. Yeah, that's like REALLY narrow. How about you actually go into a TV shop and take a look for yourself. Doc |
Looking for 23 inch LCD
"Jim Mason" wrote in message t... In article , says... Sony 32" 178 degrees Sony 26" 160 Sony 20" 160 Yeah, that's like REALLY narrow. Best ignore and not pander to his trolling? Jim Jim the IDIOT! |
Looking for 23 inch LCD
On 12 Dec, 23:49, "Agamemnon" wrote:
"Dr Hfuhruhurr" wrote in message ... On 12 Dec, 14:13, "Agamemnon" wrote: "CS" wrote in message ... On 11 Dec, 21:28, "Agamemnon" wrote: The picture on every LCD I have seen in the shops under 42 inches looks completely crap and is unwatchable unless you are positioned dead centre, and the tiny speakers on them are just as bad. The technology they use is a decade old and not comparable to the more modern technology in the large screen panels. Those comments belong back in 12th century BC and are just as mythical. You are an idiot. 42 inch panels have viewing angles of 178 degrees whereas you're lucky to get 120 degrees on anything smaller except a very expensive computer display. The same for response times. The technology they use on panels under 42 inches decade out of date. Sony 32" 178 degrees Adequate static picture from most angles you are likely to have chairs stationed. Sony 26" 160 Sony 20" 160 Unwatchable static picture unless you are positioned DEAD CENTRE. A difference of 18 degrees is not that big. plus this is a BIG way from the 120 degrees you mentioned. plus you were WRONG about the 178 degrees only being available on 42" sets. Some clarity and acceptance of your errors would be nice. Yeah, that's like REALLY narrow. How about you actually go into a TV shop and take a look for yourself. Is that a question? Doc |
Looking for 23 inch LCD
In message
, Dr Hfuhruhurr writes On 12 Dec, 23:49, "Agamemnon" wrote: "Dr Hfuhruhurr" wrote in message ... On 12 Dec, 14:13, "Agamemnon" wrote: "CS" wrote in message ... On 11 Dec, 21:28, "Agamemnon" wrote: The picture on every LCD I have seen in the shops under 42 inches looks completely crap and is unwatchable unless you are positioned dead centre, and the tiny speakers on them are just as bad. The technology they use is a decade old and not comparable to the more modern technology in the large screen panels. Those comments belong back in 12th century BC and are just as mythical. You are an idiot. 42 inch panels have viewing angles of 178 degrees whereas you're lucky to get 120 degrees on anything smaller except a very expensive computer display. The same for response times. The technology they use on panels under 42 inches decade out of date. Sony 32" 178 degrees Adequate static picture from most angles you are likely to have chairs stationed. Sony 26" 160 Sony 20" 160 Unwatchable static picture unless you are positioned DEAD CENTRE. A difference of 18 degrees is not that big. plus this is a BIG way from the 120 degrees you mentioned. plus you were WRONG about the 178 degrees only being available on 42" sets. Some clarity and acceptance of your errors would be nice. Yeah, that's like REALLY narrow. How about you actually go into a TV shop and take a look for yourself. Is that a question? Something I've always wanted to know, but never dared ask... How IS 'viewing angle' actually defined? It seems to me that numbers like 178 degrees are pretty optimistic. Surely it can't mean that you can view the picture from a position 1 degree off the plane of the screen? That's just not realistic. You wouldn't even want to view from a position of 10 degrees (160 degree screens). -- Ian. |
Looking for 23 inch LCD
|
Looking for 23 inch LCD
On 13 Dec, 10:11, "ChrisM" wrote:
In message , Ian Jackson Proclaimed from the tallest tower: Something I've always wanted to know, but never dared ask... How IS 'viewing angle' actually defined? It seems to me that numbers like 178 degrees are pretty optimistic. Surely it can't mean that you can view the picture from a position 1 degree off the plane of the screen? That's just not realistic. You wouldn't even want to view from a position of 10 degrees (160 degree screens). Sorry, I can't answer your question, but I'm glad someone has asked this, as it is something I've been wondering about too... Just have to hope someone can answer it now... to answer you both, see this link. It just goes to prove even more how wrong Aggy is. http://www.projectorpeople.com/flat-...ing-angles.asp Doc |
Looking for 23 inch LCD
"Dr Hfuhruhurr" wrote in message ... On 12 Dec, 23:49, "Agamemnon" wrote: "Dr Hfuhruhurr" wrote in message ... On 12 Dec, 14:13, "Agamemnon" wrote: "CS" wrote in message ... On 11 Dec, 21:28, "Agamemnon" wrote: The picture on every LCD I have seen in the shops under 42 inches looks completely crap and is unwatchable unless you are positioned dead centre, and the tiny speakers on them are just as bad. The technology they use is a decade old and not comparable to the more modern technology in the large screen panels. Those comments belong back in 12th century BC and are just as mythical. You are an idiot. 42 inch panels have viewing angles of 178 degrees whereas you're lucky to get 120 degrees on anything smaller except a very expensive computer display. The same for response times. The technology they use on panels under 42 inches decade out of date. Sony 32" 178 degrees Adequate static picture from most angles you are likely to have chairs stationed. Sony 26" 160 Sony 20" 160 Unwatchable static picture unless you are positioned DEAD CENTRE. A difference of 18 degrees is not that big. plus this is a BIG way from the 120 degrees you mentioned. plus you were WRONG about the 178 No it isn't. 120 degrees is quoted for a contrast ratio of 10 to 1 whereas 160 degrees is quoted for a contrast ratio of 5 to 1. In simple terms both figures and the picture quality is exactly the same and total and utter crap. degrees only being available on 42" sets. I said except for expensive computer monitors. Some clarity and acceptance of your errors would be nice. Yeah, that's like REALLY narrow. How about you actually go into a TV shop and take a look for yourself. Is that a question? It's a command. Didn't you learn about the vocative case? Doc |
Looking for 23 inch LCD
"Dr Hfuhruhurr" wrote in message ... On 13 Dec, 10:11, "ChrisM" wrote: In message , Ian Jackson Proclaimed from the tallest tower: Something I've always wanted to know, but never dared ask... How IS 'viewing angle' actually defined? It seems to me that numbers like 178 degrees are pretty optimistic. Surely it can't mean that you can view the picture from a position 1 degree off the plane of the screen? That's just not realistic. You wouldn't even want to view from a position of 10 degrees (160 degree screens). Sorry, I can't answer your question, but I'm glad someone has asked this, as it is something I've been wondering about too... Just have to hope someone can answer it now... to answer you both, see this link. It just goes to prove even more how wrong Aggy is. http://www.projectorpeople.com/flat-...ing-angles.asp You are talking total and utter crap as usual. Doc |
Looking for 23 inch LCD
"Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... In message , Dr Hfuhruhurr writes On 12 Dec, 23:49, "Agamemnon" wrote: "Dr Hfuhruhurr" wrote in message ... On 12 Dec, 14:13, "Agamemnon" wrote: "CS" wrote in message ... On 11 Dec, 21:28, "Agamemnon" wrote: The picture on every LCD I have seen in the shops under 42 inches looks completely crap and is unwatchable unless you are positioned dead centre, and the tiny speakers on them are just as bad. The technology they use is a decade old and not comparable to the more modern technology in the large screen panels. Those comments belong back in 12th century BC and are just as mythical. You are an idiot. 42 inch panels have viewing angles of 178 degrees whereas you're lucky to get 120 degrees on anything smaller except a very expensive computer display. The same for response times. The technology they use on panels under 42 inches decade out of date. Sony 32" 178 degrees Adequate static picture from most angles you are likely to have chairs stationed. Sony 26" 160 Sony 20" 160 Unwatchable static picture unless you are positioned DEAD CENTRE. A difference of 18 degrees is not that big. plus this is a BIG way from the 120 degrees you mentioned. plus you were WRONG about the 178 degrees only being available on 42" sets. Some clarity and acceptance of your errors would be nice. Yeah, that's like REALLY narrow. How about you actually go into a TV shop and take a look for yourself. Is that a question? Something I've always wanted to know, but never dared ask... How IS 'viewing angle' actually defined? It's the angle at which the contrast ratio drops to 10 to 1 or 5 to 1. 160 degree viewing angles are usually quoted for 5 to 1 contrast ratios and 120 degree viewing angles are usually quoted for 10 to 1 contrast ratios. It seems to me that numbers like 178 degrees are pretty optimistic. 178 degrees uses modern LCD technology. 120/160 degrees uses technology that was out of date a decade ago and goes back to the early 80's. Don't waste your money on a small LCD screen when a CRT can be had for 1/4 of the price and provides a much better picture which you can actually watch from any angle you want. Surely it can't mean that you can view the picture from a position 1 degree off the plane of the screen? That's just not realistic. You wouldn't even want to view from a position of 10 degrees (160 degree screens). -- Ian. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com