|
OT - First DAB+-upgradeable radio
I thought some people might be interested to know that the first DAB+
upgradeable (clock) radio has been released: http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/ar...able-radio.php Should be the first of quite a few DAB+-upgradeable receivers we'll see this year, so if you're thinking of buying a non-upgradeable DAB radio you might want to postpone your purchase for a few months. Receivers that support DAB+ without needing a software upgrade should be available by the end of the year. -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info |
OT - First DAB+-upgradeable radio
"DAB sounds worse than FM" [email protected] wrote in message ... I thought some people might be interested to know that the first DAB+ upgradeable (clock) radio has been released: http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/ar...able-radio.php Should be the first of quite a few DAB+-upgradeable receivers we'll see this year, so if you're thinking of buying a non-upgradeable DAB radio you might want to postpone your purchase for a few months. Receivers that support DAB+ without needing a software upgrade should be available by the end of the year. I was going to buy a new radio for the motorhome, but I think I'll wait a while. BTW, what about the TRAFFIC channel? Hmm . . Bill |
OT - First DAB+-upgradeable radio
"DAB sounds worse than FM" [email protected] wrote in message
... I thought some people might be interested to know that the first DAB+ upgradeable (clock) radio has been released: http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/ar...able-radio.php ....snip... Interesting to see that they are expected to milk another 10-15quid from consumers for the upgrade. This will probably be the same software installed for free on all their newer releases. Not a good precedence. Paul DS. |
OT - First DAB+-upgradeable radio
Bill Wright wrote:
"DAB sounds worse than FM" [email protected] wrote in message ... I thought some people might be interested to know that the first DAB+ upgradeable (clock) radio has been released: http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/ar...able-radio.php Should be the first of quite a few DAB+-upgradeable receivers we'll see this year, so if you're thinking of buying a non-upgradeable DAB radio you might want to postpone your purchase for a few months. Receivers that support DAB+ without needing a software upgrade should be available by the end of the year. I was going to buy a new radio for the motorhome, but I think I'll wait a while. BTW, what about the TRAFFIC channel? Hmm . . I've only had a very quick listen to the Traffic Channel, and it sounded extremely shambolic, but overall I think it's a good idea that local traffic information be provided on a dedicated radio station. -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info |
OT - First DAB+-upgradeable radio
Paul D.Smith wrote:
"DAB sounds worse than FM" [email protected] wrote in message ... I thought some people might be interested to know that the first DAB+ upgradeable (clock) radio has been released: http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/ar...able-radio.php ...snip... Interesting to see that they are expected to milk another 10-15quid from consumers for the upgrade. This will probably be the same software installed for free on all their newer releases. Not a good precedence. But I think receivers that have the upgrade already installed will probably sell for a higher price, so there may not be much between buying an upgradeable set or one that already has it pre-installed. I agree though, it does seem to be being used as a way of milking people, and one way of looking at the issue of them hiding information about DAB+ is that it basically will make people buy more than one radio, because those buying non-DAB+ radios will have to buy DAB+ radios in the end as well, so that's also a way of making extra profits at the expense of unwitting consumers... -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info |
OT - First DAB+-upgradeable radio
Bill Wright wrote:
I was going to buy a new radio for the motorhome, but I think I'll wait a while. BTW, what about the TRAFFIC channel? Hmm . . It's thrilling stuff isn't it ? AIUI provided directly by the Highways Agency, it's on just about all the local DAB muxes. Interesting to see how it gets on, given the very low penetration of DAB receivers in vehicles. Previous similar stations, such as Airport Information Radio at Heathrow and Gatwick, and Channel Tunnel Radio failed dismally, and they were on AM and FM respectively. |
OT - First DAB+-upgradeable radio
DAB sounds worse than FM wrote:
I thought some people might be interested to know that the first DAB+ upgradeable (clock) radio has been released: http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/ar...able-radio.php Should be the first of quite a few DAB+-upgradeable receivers we'll see this year, so if you're thinking of buying a non-upgradeable DAB radio you might want to postpone your purchase for a few months. Receivers that support DAB+ without needing a software upgrade should be available by the end of the year. Pleased to see this: http://www.pure.com/ecoplus/ Rob |
OT - First DAB+-upgradeable radio
Rob wrote:
DAB sounds worse than FM wrote: I thought some people might be interested to know that the first DAB+ upgradeable (clock) radio has been released: http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/ar...able-radio.php Should be the first of quite a few DAB+-upgradeable receivers we'll see this year, so if you're thinking of buying a non-upgradeable DAB radio you might want to postpone your purchase for a few months. Receivers that support DAB+ without needing a software upgrade should be available by the end of the year. Pleased to see this: http://www.pure.com/ecoplus/ Receivers that are DAB+-upgradeable (or ones that will support it natively once they've finished the software) are using a new DAB receiver chip which reduces the power consumption relative to previous DAB receiver chips by a factor of 7 - this is something that the chip manufacturer, Frontier-Silicon, has managed to achieve, not Pure Digital. The reduction in power is due to the new chip using smaller transistors so the chip voltages are lower, and they've moved external memory onto the chip itself to eliminate power consumption due to bus transfers to external memory. -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info |
OT - First DAB+-upgradeable radio
On 20/07/2007 11:51, Rob wrote:
Pleased to see this: http://www.pure.com/ecoplus/ So the saving (whether switched on, or turned off) is about 5W, multiply that by 24x365 equals 43.8kWh, at 9p/unit that'll save under £4 worth of planet per year, better than nothing, but hardly worth "green" bragging rights. |
OT - First DAB+-upgradeable radio
Receivers that are DAB+-upgradeable (or ones that will support it natively
once they've finished the software) are using a new DAB receiver chip which reduces the power consumption relative to previous DAB receiver chips by a factor of 7 - this is something that the chip manufacturer, Frontier-Silicon, has managed to achieve, not Pure Digital. The reduction in power is due to the new chip using smaller transistors so the chip voltages are lower, and they've moved external memory onto the chip itself to eliminate power consumption due to bus transfers to external memory. Good to hear but you can't blame Pure for touting the fact that they at least are using this new chip ;-). Paul DS |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com