|
|
Freeview Box Recommendations
Hi all
Anyone got any links to recent Freeview box tests/reviews please? Had a cheap Durabrand jobbie for about a year but it has been unreliable and does not automatically update channel listings etc. So would like recommendations on fairly basic model and also (in case I'm feeling flush) a more feature rich model with hard drive for program recording etc. TIA Phil |
Freeview Box Recommendations
"TheScullster" wrote in
. uk: Hi all So would like recommendations on fairly basic model and also (in case I'm feeling flush) a more feature rich model with hard drive for program recording etc. Apologies for joining in, but I'd also be interested in sensitivity, something most of them seem to be coy about, but it matters to me. I know that the GDB4 is much better than the Matsui DTR3 on exactly the same aerial, and the GDB4 has a claimed sensitivity of -82dB, which I understand is good. But if I wanted a better box, or a PVR, I'd need to know the chances of getting at least acceptable reception on at least some of the muxes. Specially, if, like scullster, I hoped to go upmarket. ATM [email protected] need an auxiliary analogue tuner to make sure I could get usable recording! mike |
Freeview Box Recommendations
"mike" wrote in message ... "TheScullster" wrote in . uk: Hi all So would like recommendations on fairly basic model and also (in case I'm feeling flush) a more feature rich model with hard drive for program recording etc. Apologies for joining in, but I'd also be interested in sensitivity, something most of them seem to be coy about, but it matters to me. I know that the GDB4 is much better than the Matsui DTR3 on exactly the same aerial, and the GDB4 has a claimed sensitivity of -82dB, which I understand is good. But if I wanted a better box, or a PVR, I'd need to know the chances of getting at least acceptable reception on at least some of the muxes. Specially, if, like scullster, I hoped to go upmarket. ATM [email protected] need an auxiliary analogue tuner to make sure I could get usable recording! Will better sensitivity mean problems from anologue transmissions? I remember my Philips ONdigi box had a 13db attenuator in line with the aerial to get it to work. -- Regards, David Please reply to News Group |
Freeview Box Recommendations
On 6 Jul, 12:09, "TheScullster" wrote:
Hi all Anyone got any links to recent Freeview box tests/reviews please? Had a cheap Durabrand jobbie for about a year but it has been unreliable and does not automatically update channel listings etc. So would like recommendations on fairly basic model and also (in case I'm feeling flush) a more feature rich model with hard drive for program recording etc. I got the Bush one that's built into a SCART connector - seems very sensitive, certainly not as many picture breakups as my elderly Netgem iPlayer - the Bush one is now available at Argos for £35, btw. Failing that, the Humax Fox F2T is highly regarded though even that is getting a bit long in the tooth. For top sensitivity without a doubt the Humax 9200t PVR is hard to beat. Not the cheapest PVR but definitely the best at c£190 or so. JPG TIA Phil |
Freeview Box Recommendations
"David" wrote in news:rOpji.19849$%[email protected]
gui.ntli.net: Specially, if, like scullster, I hoped to go upmarket. ATM [email protected] need an auxiliary analogue tuner to make sure I could get usable recording! Will better sensitivity mean problems from anologue transmissions? I remember my Philips ONdigi box had a 13db attenuator in line with the aerial to get it to work. I don't know; the problem seems to be the differece between the powerful muxes, and the weaker ones. However I do need a sensitive box to get the weaker ones, and if I need to I can use attenuators; they're easier to find than more signal! mike |
Freeview Box Recommendations
The Humax Fox2T has to be the very best box around for many reasons:
The menu system has to be the largest and clearest around and certainly the easiest to navigate around. The connectivity is second to none. 2 Scart sockets It has RGB, S Video and composite available on both the TV AND the VCR sockets. Audio out, seperate composite video out, Digital audio out. It has a modulator so it can also feed older TV's without scart or to other rooms if necessary. It has a seperate list for radio stations, switchable from radio to TV with one button. It has a large, clear remote which can control the basic functions of most well known brands of TV to save using two handsets. (Try the Philips codes if all else fails for cheaper makes of TV, by the way, as so many are made by Vestel who use Philips codes.) Certainly I have found them to be sensitive alongside others. You can erase unwanted channels easily if required and create favourites. The build quality and casing are much better than many (Metal case) And they are guaranteed for 2 Years. I could (and usually do !) go on. I know it looks as if I have a vested interest, I don't. I do sell and install them, and many other makes and models but I would go for one of these every time if I had the choice and could persuade customers not to waste their money on cheap ones. The old addage of you get what you pay for is true. Certainly they have been around for some time. They haven't changed a bit, and don't really need to. If they do, it will probably be because of financial pressure from those who will only buy cheap, and so corners would inenitably be cut. But thats only my oppinion, of course! Then, of course there's the PVR9200. Magic!! |
Freeview Box Recommendations
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 11:56:41 -0700, widgitt
wrote: The Humax Fox2T has to be the very best box around for many reasons: Many beg to differ: http://www.reviewcentre.com/review230890.html http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/digitalt...-f2-fox-t.html I bought one several years ago following a 'Which' recommendation. I noticed immediately that it wasn't as sensitive as my neighbour's cheap Sagem which I'd borrowed to prove my aerial was digitally capable. Had to buy a booster to solve the problem. Apart from that I was initially very impressed, then the cracks started to appear. At first it would crash every couple of weeks, just after the warranty expired it was almost daily. There was no way I could go away for the weekend knowing that on return my VCR had captured what was expected. Certainly they have been around for some time. They haven't changed a bit, and don't really need to. Quote from Manual: 2. Detail Programme Information You can see detailed information about the current programme. Press the i button where I-plate is displayed to view detailed information. No you can't .The lack of program info once the EPG has populated is totally unacceptable. Humax have been aware of this for a long time and have failed to come up with a fix, despite several false promisses. Shoddy and unacceptable customer service. It was a reasonable box in its day but having seen a number of boxes bought by friends and colleagues over the last twelve months, all at a fraction of the price of the FOX , I am of the onion that it's now poor value for money. Only wish the Sony was still around Graham C. |
Freeview Box Recommendations
No problem with Info on mine. I use it frequently but I have just
checked it thoroughly on two stock boxes. EPG fully populated and "info" works fine both when viewing a programme and from a highlited programme on the guide. Press i button twice for full info when viewing a prog. I get a very good signal on all MUXS from the Hannington transmitter but I have just set up four different receivers on a good 4 way passive splitter fed from a variable attenuator. Thomson, old Philips OnDigital, Humax Fox and Sagem.Gradually reducing the signal, the Thomson and the Philips started to break up first and the Humax and Sagem were both almost equal next. I agree the Sony was also good and had a dual purpose remote but, of course, it has been pushed out on price as well. The vast majority (hundreds of brand names) now are of Vestel origin and the menus are all essentially the same. Usually small fiddly handsets, unlike the Sony and Humax, and rather cluttered menus and EPGs. Out of many, many Fox's I have only returned two and both of these went dead within a few minutes of use. (and another, but the customers' cat peed in that!) |
Freeview Box Recommendations
On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 04:34:52 -0700, widgitt
wrote: No problem with Info on mine. I use it frequently but I have just checked it thoroughly on two stock boxes. EPG fully populated and "info" works fine both when viewing a programme and from a highlited programme on the guide. Press i button twice for full info when viewing a prog. Do your boxes have the 'games' installed? Humax reported a while ago that the lack of 'Info' whan the EPG is fully populated is to to insufficient memory in the box. Deleting the games would free up enough to allow the info to work. However they were reluctant to do so. If you do have a box without games then they are releasing new stock with updated software. If you do have games they they've fixed the problem some other way, despite saying it couldn't be done. Either way they should offer the upgrade as a firmware download. Graham C |
Freeview Box Recommendations
TheScullster wrote:
Hi all Anyone got any links to recent Freeview box tests/reviews please? Had a cheap Durabrand jobbie for about a year but it has been unreliable and does not automatically update channel listings etc. So would like recommendations on fairly basic model and also (in case I'm feeling flush) a more feature rich model with hard drive for program recording etc. TIA Phil It's worth having a look on eBay for refurbished Digihome PVRs - I got an 80GB disk one for £48. The mostly seem to be Argos catalogue returns but are pretty much 'as new'. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:13 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com