|
Widescreen TV's a major contributor to the Global Warmigg Crisis.
Bob Latham wrote:
There is a strong theory that temperatures on earth are directly related to sunspot activity and in fact the two do correlate very closely. Why do you believe this, when it isn't true? There has been no change in any of the solar indices (apart from the usual 11-year periodicity) since at least 1980, and no change in cosmic ray flux since at least 1950. And spurious correlations can be found wherever you look for them: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php...ions/#more-433 Unlike human Co2 production, sunspot activity does map against not only decadal temperature rises and falls but also the weather we experience. And that is ******** too. Where do you pick up this nonsense? |
Widescreen TV's a major contributor to the Global Warmigg Crisis.
Bill Wright wrote:
The science underpinning global warming has nothing to do with the "nanny state". Carbon dioxide does not care how you vote, or even if you vote. It's a greenhouse gas, and it behaves according to its physical properties. Atmospheric levels of CO2 are increasing due to human activities most likely caused by the Continental types who drink fizzy water spiked with CO2 don't cha' think? and it makes you fart. It's all you young uns drinking fizzy lager when you should be supping real ale. They should indeed. I try my best to convert them, but it's a losing battle, I fear. Now we have cider again, only with ice in it. It's a revolutionary new drink, apparently. I actually did once look into fizzy drink CO2 as a contributor to global warming. I concluded that the CO2 used was mostly a by-product of ammonia production, so it would be released into the atmosphere anyway... |
Widescreen TV's a major contributor to the Global Warmigg Crisis.
Pyriform wrote:
It's all you young uns drinking fizzy lager when you should be supping real ale. I actually did once look into fizzy drink CO2 as a contributor to global warming. I concluded that the CO2 used was mostly a by-product of ammonia production, so it would be released into the atmosphere anyway... I forgot to add that the CO2 in beer and lager is carbon neutral when it is brewed anyway, so the above only applies to unnaturally carbonated drinks... |
Widescreen TV's a major contributor to the Global Warmigg Crisis.
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:40:22 +0100, "Pyriform"
wrote: For gooodness' sake! Look at the graph of global temperatures going back to prehistoric times (do you really need me to find a link to such a graph?). Note its cyclical nature. Then note how the present changes fit pretty well into the cyclical pattern. Yes, I really do need you to provide me with a link to such a graph. Such an astonishing paleoclimatic reconstruction would be glorious to behold, I am sure. Posted to this thread. Prepare to behold the glory! (I'm surprised that someone with your passion for the subject has not heard of the ice core data anaysis). -- Cynic |
Widescreen TV's a major contributor to the Global Warmigg Crisis.
Cynic wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:40:22 +0100, "Pyriform" wrote: For gooodness' sake! Look at the graph of global temperatures going back to prehistoric times (do you really need me to find a link to such a graph?). Note its cyclical nature. Then note how the present changes fit pretty well into the cyclical pattern. Yes, I really do need you to provide me with a link to such a graph. Such an astonishing paleoclimatic reconstruction would be glorious to behold, I am sure. Posted to this thread. Prepare to behold the glory! (I'm surprised that someone with your passion for the subject has not heard of the ice core data anaysis). Er, where is it then? And yes, I am familiar with ice core data analysis. |
Widescreen TV's a major contributor to the Global Warmigg Crisis.
"Pyriform" wrote in message
... : : I actually did once look into fizzy drink CO2 as a contributor to global : warming. I concluded that the CO2 used was mostly a by-product of ammonia : production, so it would be released into the atmosphere anyway... so during the normal production of ammonia they just vent-off the CO2? seems like they may want to change that habit. Perhaps we could use CO2 as a plasma source for wide screen TV's? |
Widescreen TV's a major contributor to the Global Warmigg Crisis.
"Pyriform" wrote in message
... : : Yes, I really do need you to provide me with a link to such a graph. Such an : astonishing paleoclimatic reconstruction would be glorious to behold, I am : sure. Not sure what it has to do with LCD/Plasma/CRT wide screen televisions... but here you go: http://www.scotese.com/climate.htm no need to thank me, I do what I can to enlighten |
Widescreen TV's a major contributor to the Global Warmigg Crisis.
"Low Life #3" wrote in message ... "Bill Wright" wrote in message ... : : most likely caused by the Continental types who drink fizzy water spiked : with CO2 don't cha' think? and it makes you fart. : : It's all you young uns drinking fizzy lager when you should be supping real : ale. : : Bill I plead guilty. However I beg the court for mercy as I live in Germany and ale isn't a local tradition. Oh well you have access to PROPER lager then. Bill |
Widescreen TV's a major contributor to the Global Warmigg Crisis.
"Low Life #3" wrote in message ... "Pyriform" wrote in message ... : : I actually did once look into fizzy drink CO2 as a contributor to global : warming. I concluded that the CO2 used was mostly a by-product of ammonia : production, so it would be released into the atmosphere anyway... so during the normal production of ammonia they just vent-off the CO2? seems like they may want to change that habit. Perhaps we could use CO2 as a plasma source for wide screen TV's? Most of tthe CO2 comes from the oceans they as a ginormus CO2 sponge. However as it gets hotter that cannot absorb as much CO2 why CO2 always rises as the Earth warms. It's a symptom not a cause. |
Widescreen TV's a major contributor to the Global Warmigg Crisis.
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 00:54:09 +0100, "Pyriform"
wrote: Alex Heney wrote: While this is nothing whatsoever to do with widescreen (of course, that is just your hobby-horse), it is rather surprising that LCD and plasma screen TV sets *do* use more power than the equivalent CRT. I couldn't find the specifications of many, but looking on the Philips website, they have the full spec including power consumption of all their TVs. And the CRT 32PW9570/05 uses 109W in normal usage, while the same sized LCD 32PF9641D/10 uses 128W (it does use less in standby). The LCD will have a larger screen size, of course... Any chance of you actually *reading* what you respond to? I was talking about the *same* size screen. As I said in the post. -- Alex Heney, Global Villager If you don't like the news, go out and make some of your own. To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com