Is this TV Ok for Sky HD??
 

"Paul F" wrote in message
...
In article , Mike Henry
Which part of the above explanation is a problem? Have you actually read
the original post? It is about resolution and pixels (and from that,
aspect ratio). Having a great panel, even the best in the world, but
then scaling the pixels for EVERY resolution it will ever display, is an
absurd and unnecessary degradation in quality. If it had 720 lines and
square pixels, fine: compromise on the 1080i broadcasts and relish in
the 720p perfection. But to actually recommend that someone who wants to
watch HD should buy a 1024x768 display in 2007 when proper 720p and
1080p displays are available is just silly.


The op said "is this TV Ok for Sky HD". I have Sky HD. I have this TV. As
you have seen neither of those 2 working together how does that make your
opinion valid? I have seen this side by side with a Sony 1080p LCD and
there was very little difference in picture quality, unless you sit 2
inches from your TV of course.

1080p is not all it's cracked up to be, certainly not on a 42 inch screen.


Many thanx for your comments. I have read the reviews as you suggested and
after reading what you had to say I have one on order.

Again many thanx

Is this TV Ok for Sky HD??
 

"the dog from that film you saw" wrote
in message ...

still doesnt make it horizontally interlaced!


????...I corrected the original message, in which I said it was the full
1920