HomeCinemaBanter

HomeCinemaBanter (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/index.php)
-   UK digital tv (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   LCD's - Panasonic vs Samsung (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/showthread.php?t=51449)

charles June 4th 07 12:09 AM

LCD's - Panasonic vs Samsung
 
In article ,
tony sayer wrote:
In article , Alan
writes
In message , tony sayer
wrote
In article , Alan
writes

Don't suppose you would but don't expect much in the way of good advice
when your buying it..


Who needs the advice of shop salespeople? They will only attempt to flog
you the items with the greatest profit margin and then an unnecessary
extended warranty.

The only advantage shopping in a local store is that you can get the
goods immediately without having to wait for delivery.


Well years ago when I was in the TV trade I reckon that overall pictures
were much better then what they are today, as you had a trained engineer
who knew what the picture was supposed to look like and we insisted that
an efficient aerial be used and overall standards were higher.


And today **** poor set up TV's showing nothing like they can do!.


Two of our neighbours using indoor aerials with very mixed results and
the widescreen that the other has all over the place!....


and I just found SWMBO watching dttv with the picture in 4:3 mode. She
said she hadn't noticed ;-(

--
From KT24 - in "Leafy Surrey"

Using a RISC OS computer running v5.11


Chas Gill June 4th 07 10:54 AM

LCD's - Panasonic vs Samsung
 

"charles" wrote in message
...
In article ,
tony sayer wrote:
In article , Alan
writes
In message , tony sayer
wrote
In article , Alan
writes

Don't suppose you would but don't expect much in the way of good advice
when your buying it..

Who needs the advice of shop salespeople? They will only attempt to flog
you the items with the greatest profit margin and then an unnecessary
extended warranty.

The only advantage shopping in a local store is that you can get the
goods immediately without having to wait for delivery.


Well years ago when I was in the TV trade I reckon that overall pictures
were much better then what they are today, as you had a trained engineer
who knew what the picture was supposed to look like and we insisted that
an efficient aerial be used and overall standards were higher.


And today **** poor set up TV's showing nothing like they can do!.


Two of our neighbours using indoor aerials with very mixed results and
the widescreen that the other has all over the place!....


and I just found SWMBO watching dttv with the picture in 4:3 mode. She
said she hadn't noticed ;-(

--
From KT24 - in "Leafy Surrey"

Using a RISC OS computer running v5.11


In my experience TWMBO (the collective noun for SWMBO :-) very rarely do -
especially when it's a 4:3 stretched to 16:9. Personally I believe it is a
genetically inherited defence mechanism designed to thwart our arguments for
spending megabucks on an even bigger and better one before we even open our
mouths......................





>{daZza} June 4th 07 05:52 PM

LCD's - Panasonic vs Samsung
 
diy-newby wrote:
:: Looking to purchase my first LCD tv. I thought I had my mind set up
:: on the Samsung LE37M87BDX (Full 1080p). But, my dad has a small 26"
:: Panasonic LCD and the quality of the picture is fantastic. He has
:: since been told that the Panasonic LCD's are very very good, one of
:: the best on the market.
::
:: Anyone have any comments on either brand of TV?
::
:: TIA

Panasonic every time (as long as its the 600/700 not 60/70 range) I have the
600 series 32" lcd, its superb, got that after 2 months review hunting of
all the 32" lcd's available, and then some 2 hours comparing in John
Lewis's, got John Lewis to price match (was listed at £1300, got it for
£999) and they chuck in a 5 year warranty, get yourself over to av forums
and ask around, most helpful bunch of people http://www.avforums.com/

HTH


--
daZza

(remove "BUT_PLUG" to reply)
*
www.thekellyhouse.co.uk*



marika[_2_] June 6th 07 04:44 AM

LCD's - Panasonic vs Samsung
 

Java Jive wrote in message ...

As I have recently shown in another thread ...
http://tinyurl.com/27ajfd
... standing in for ...
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.te...ad/thread/2c68

5270eed0b750/dfb22a5b9d5794ce?lnk=st&q=&rnum=1#dfb22a5b9d5794ce
... even making a rational choice of a new kettle is more complex than

might
at first appear, and in that thread the group seemed to agree with me that
information posted on a manufacturer's website is just plain wrong, in that
it runs contrary to the laws of physics!


check out the first post from this link

mk5000

"if I never see your face again. I don't mind cause we've gone much farther
than I thought we'd go tonigh"--maroon 5




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com