|
$300 Hi-Def DVD
"=\(8\)" wrote in
: I see more ads for movies coming on Blue-Ray than HD-DVD so right now I am leaning that direction. However, for me it is still far too soon to make the move to any HD DVD format. Part of me suspects that neither is going to win and they will evently have to come together. The PlayStation 3 is not selling well, the price is just too high even when you figure what you are getting and what it would cost to buy each peice seperatly. But, that isn't something many seem to consider. Personally, I don't feel that either format is what is needed. They feel like stop gap measures especially when you look at the computer side of it. I know a great number of people that have more than are nearly 1 TeraByte of computer storage space. I have almost 2 myself. What I hear most often is that 50GB is nothing and I think they are right it is nothing. If a format could survive without the computer end of it then HD DVD and Blue-Ray might make it, but they can't and even the PS3 can't give them that. Basically it is still too iffy to go with either one. Time will tell if one is the next consumer format or if they are both the equivilent of Circuit City's Divx format or Sony's Betamax. =(8) (I paid 300 for the Toshiba ax2. The picture is the same as or close to blu Ray. It has given me much enjoyment |
$300 Hi-Def DVD
|
$300 Hi-Def DVD
In article ,
BDK wrote: In article , r says... BDK wrote: As far as the HD/BlueRay "war" goes, I'm not biting until I can get a cheap universal player, or HD throws in the towel. I really don't see how HD is going to win this thing in the long run, once the price equals out. What makes you think that BR prices will be as low as HD in anything but the longest of terms? HD machines have the advantage of being compatible with DVD tooling. All BR products require new, and very expensive, tooling that has to be amortized. HD could have the price advantage for years because the tooling for it already has been amortized. Matthew At a certain point, the price will drop to about the same as HDDVD, and that will be the turning point. The resources of the BR companies is many times that of HDDVD. It won't be a whole lot longer, I bet the reason it's taken this long is teething issues at the factories. Everything electronic has a "tipping point", price wise. LCD TV's are part this point now, getting cheaper and better all the time. I wouldn't be shocked if Xmas or even this fall is when BR comes out with the HD killer. I wouldn't buy either right now, but the price of BR is my only reason not to buy. I have no confidence HD will be here a few years from now. It's not a big concern of mine, I can wait. I just don't see how the HD side can expect to win this against everything lined up against them. Sony and it's allied companies (Zenith, and Toshiba, I think, lost the Beta/VHS war with a better product (Well, a better pic anyway. My friend worked at an appliance store back when I was looking to buy my first VCR. and there were several times as many Beta machines being fixed with serious issues (eating tapes) as VHS machines, and that clinched it (VHS) for me) going up against the much bigger companies of RCA, Panasonic (Who made most of the VHS machines regardless of brand in the early years)Hitachi, etc. RCA was huge back then, and Panasonic too, together, they alone were probably enough to ensure VHS's long term survival. I think I read somewhere that there were 10 companies making/selling VHS machines that were bigger than Sony was. Added together, it was a force Sony had no way to compete with. This time, it looks like Sony will be on the winning side. BDK The kink in the wringer these days is LG and Samsung. Both were BluRay only and strong supporters. But now LG has a dual format player out and Samsung has announced one for later this year. Add in Sony's inability to set a standard in the past and I'm not so willing to bet on BR any more than I would HD-DVD. And strangely, Sony the strongest pusher of BluRay, makes both the PS3 and a BR player. And at this point in time, the PS3 is the much better player at a better price point. Bottom line is that it will be the bottom line pricing that will decide the outcome of the 'war'. As long as pricing of BluRay remains at the $500+ level it will only be enthusiasts that are buying. Joe six pack will not spend that much, content or no. |
$300 Hi-Def DVD
|
$300 Hi-Def DVD
"Smarty" wrote:
I think it is far too early to declare a BluRay victory. Moreover, the potential for a merged format, or even a yet to be marketed (Chinese) HD format is not to be entirely dismissed IMHO. Smarty "BDK" wrote in message ... In article , r says... BDK wrote: As far as the HD/BlueRay "war" goes, I'm not biting until I can get a cheap universal player, or HD throws in the towel. I really don't see how HD is going to win this thing in the long run, once the price equals out. What makes you think that BR prices will be as low as HD in anything but the longest of terms? HD machines have the advantage of being compatible with DVD tooling. All BR products require new, and very expensive, tooling that has to be amortized. HD could have the price advantage for years because the tooling for it already has been amortized. Matthew At a certain point, the price will drop to about the same as HDDVD, and that will be the turning point. The resources of the BR companies is many times that of HDDVD. It won't be a whole lot longer, I bet the reason it's taken this long is teething issues at the factories. Everything electronic has a "tipping point", price wise. LCD TV's are part this point now, getting cheaper and better all the time. I wouldn't be shocked if Xmas or even this fall is when BR comes out with the HD killer. I wouldn't buy either right now, but the price of BR is my only reason not to buy. I have no confidence HD will be here a few years from now. It's not a big concern of mine, I can wait. I just don't see how the HD side can expect to win this against everything lined up against them. Sony and it's allied companies (Zenith, and Toshiba, I think, lost the Beta/VHS war with a better product (Well, a better pic anyway. My friend worked at an appliance store back when I was looking to buy my first VCR. and there were several times as many Beta machines being fixed with serious issues (eating tapes) as VHS machines, and that clinched it (VHS) for me) going up against the much bigger companies of RCA, Panasonic (Who made most of the VHS machines regardless of brand in the early years)Hitachi, etc. RCA was huge back then, and Panasonic too, together, they alone were probably enough to ensure VHS's long term survival. I think I read somewhere that there were 10 companies making/selling VHS machines that were bigger than Sony was. Added together, it was a force Sony had no way to compete with. This time, it looks like Sony will be on the winning side. BDK toshiba HD 2 player is available now at Costco, and I assume everywhere soon, for $250. cheapest Blue Ray player I can find is still on the far side of $700.... Actually I think the proplem is, nobody is buying either format....2 formats competing for a 1/4 format market. |
$300 Hi-Def DVD
In article ,
says... In article , BDK wrote: In article , r says... BDK wrote: As far as the HD/BlueRay "war" goes, I'm not biting until I can get a cheap universal player, or HD throws in the towel. I really don't see how HD is going to win this thing in the long run, once the price equals out. What makes you think that BR prices will be as low as HD in anything but the longest of terms? HD machines have the advantage of being compatible with DVD tooling. All BR products require new, and very expensive, tooling that has to be amortized. HD could have the price advantage for years because the tooling for it already has been amortized. Matthew At a certain point, the price will drop to about the same as HDDVD, and that will be the turning point. The resources of the BR companies is many times that of HDDVD. It won't be a whole lot longer, I bet the reason it's taken this long is teething issues at the factories. Everything electronic has a "tipping point", price wise. LCD TV's are part this point now, getting cheaper and better all the time. I wouldn't be shocked if Xmas or even this fall is when BR comes out with the HD killer. I wouldn't buy either right now, but the price of BR is my only reason not to buy. I have no confidence HD will be here a few years from now. It's not a big concern of mine, I can wait. I just don't see how the HD side can expect to win this against everything lined up against them. Sony and it's allied companies (Zenith, and Toshiba, I think, lost the Beta/VHS war with a better product (Well, a better pic anyway. My friend worked at an appliance store back when I was looking to buy my first VCR. and there were several times as many Beta machines being fixed with serious issues (eating tapes) as VHS machines, and that clinched it (VHS) for me) going up against the much bigger companies of RCA, Panasonic (Who made most of the VHS machines regardless of brand in the early years)Hitachi, etc. RCA was huge back then, and Panasonic too, together, they alone were probably enough to ensure VHS's long term survival. I think I read somewhere that there were 10 companies making/selling VHS machines that were bigger than Sony was. Added together, it was a force Sony had no way to compete with. This time, it looks like Sony will be on the winning side. BDK The kink in the wringer these days is LG and Samsung. Both were BluRay only and strong supporters. But now LG has a dual format player out and Samsung has announced one for later this year. Add in Sony's inability to set a standard in the past and I'm not so willing to bet on BR any more than I would HD-DVD. And strangely, Sony the strongest pusher of BluRay, makes both the PS3 and a BR player. And at this point in time, the PS3 is the much better player at a better price point. Bottom line is that it will be the bottom line pricing that will decide the outcome of the 'war'. As long as pricing of BluRay remains at the $500+ level it will only be enthusiasts that are buying. Joe six pack will not spend that much, content or no. When the price gets below $400, that will start a strong move in sales. Dual format players are a good work around, as far as not getting stuck picking the losing format and wasting a ton of money buying the "wrong" thing. BDK |
$300 Hi-Def DVD
BDK wrote:
When the price gets below $400, that will start a strong move in sales. Dual format players are a good work around, as far as not getting stuck picking the losing format and wasting a ton of money buying the "wrong" thing. I just paid $540 for an HD-XA2. I will very quickly pay far more than that in HD-DVDs. Guess what? They will continue to play in my HD-DVD player even if BR "wins". Matthew -- I'm a consultant. If you want an opinion I'll sell you one. Which one do you want? |
$300 Hi-Def DVD
In article ,
"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" wrote: In message , sprach forth the following: toshiba HD 2 player is available now at Costco, and I assume everywhere soon, for $250. That player is 1080i, not 1080p. From doing lots of reading, 1080p is just so much marketing and not much else. Every review I've seen says that onscreen differences are so slight that they are unnoticeable. |
$300 Hi-Def DVD
In article ,
"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" wrote: In message , Lloyd Parsons sprach forth the following: From doing lots of reading, 1080p is just so much marketing and not much else. Who would be so stupid as to rely on "lots of reading" to make a judgment regarding PICTURE QUALITY? Apparently, you. LOL! I do a lot of research before I buy, then I look and see. And in both my research and in direct viewing, 1080p and 1080i are a wash. But feel free to spend more money on 1080p over 1080i for a while... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com