|
|
HD Petition for UK DTT
This has been posted in another group I subscribe to.
There is a petition regarding Ofcom's plans to auction the spectrum made available after DSO. http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/openhdtv/ There is also an opportunity to respond to the DDR (Digital Dividend Review) proposal by using the on-line form found he http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/ddr/howtorespond/form -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. |
HD Petition for UK DTT
"Rod L." wrote in message ... I'd rather they used a large portion of the available bandwidth to increase the bit rates of the existing freeview channels. Where is that petition please? -- Regards, David Please reply to News Group |
HD Petition for UK DTT
"Mark Carver" wrote in message ... This has been posted in another group I subscribe to. There is a petition regarding Ofcom's plans to auction the spectrum made available after DSO. http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/openhdtv/ There is also an opportunity to respond to the DDR (Digital Dividend Review) proposal by using the on-line form found he http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/ddr/howtorespond/form -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. I'd rather they used a large portion of the available bandwidth to increase the bit rates of the existing freeview channels. |
HD Petition for UK DTT
"David" wrote in message ... "Rod L." wrote in message ... I'd rather they used a large portion of the available bandwidth to increase the bit rates of the existing freeview channels. Where is that petition please? -- Regards, David I wouldn't bother - have you ever watched HD? The only difference is that they use a better camera and intensify the colours and contrast more, then use more close ups. It's like watching the French football coverage, that has HD quality compared to UK pictures! See for yourself next time. How you can have HD on a poor quality LCD screen is anyone's guess. When LCD is out of the way and SED and others are at the right price we might be able to move on. LCD is crap with the smearing effects caused by slow refresh rates. Companies stopped making LCD TVs last year anyway, all you're buying now is the stockpiled surplus. That's why many STILL have a 25-30mS refresh rate on grey to grey, not even black to black as that would be a higher figure, and no digital freeview tuner. The public were conned over LCD. People only bought them because some have to have the latest stuff no matter how overpriced or crap it is. CRT is the way to go, it provides a far superior picture. SED is a flat CRT technology. There are now other displays being used on camcorders and laptops that use a new generation of LED. So watch out for those too. |
HD Petition for UK DTT
In
bronco wrote: [snip] CRT is the way to go, it provides a far superior picture. SED is a flat CRT technology. There are now other displays being used on camcorders and laptops that use a new generation of LED. So watch out for those too. News to me and assuming correct, good news at that! Thanks bronco. -- aa |
HD Petition for UK DTT
bronco wrote:
When LCD is out of the way and SED and others are at the right price we might be able to move on. LCD is crap with the smearing effects caused by slow refresh rates. Companies stopped making LCD TVs last year anyway, all you're buying now is the stockpiled surplus. No, they didn't. You are spouting utter nonsense. LCD technology continues to improve, and has massive ongoing investment behind it. Your idea that this is just some anti-consumer conspiracy is ridiculous. CRT is the way to go, it provides a far superior picture. No, it doesn't. It has plenty of flaws of its own. SED is a flat CRT technology. That's not how I would describe it. But how it works is irrelevant. What matters is that you can't buy one, and may never be able to, or may only be able to buy one at an enormous price. Time will tell. Toshiba have now withdrawn from SED development, leaving Canon to go it alone. There are now other displays being used on camcorders and laptops that use a new generation of LED. So watch out for those too. Yes, OLEDs or something else may be the future display technology of choice. But not yet. |
HD Petition for UK DTT
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 08:52:41 GMT, "aa"
wrote: CRT is the way to go, it provides a far superior picture. SED is a flat CRT technology. There are now other displays being used on camcorders and laptops that use a new generation of LED. So watch out for those too. News to me and assuming correct, good news at that! Thanks bronco. Big assumption. Modern LCD's running in HD look fantastic. -- Andrew, contact via http://interpleb.googlepages.com Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards, please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text. Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question. |
HD Petition for UK DTT
aa wrote:
In bronco wrote: [snip] CRT is the way to go, it provides a far superior picture. SED is a flat CRT technology. There are now other displays being used on camcorders and laptops that use a new generation of LED. So watch out for those too. News to me and assuming correct, good news at that! Thanks bronco. No , bronco keeps posting the same misinformed tat over and over again -- Alex "I laugh in the face of danger. Then I hide until it goes away" www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk |
HD Petition for UK DTT
"bronco" wrote in message ... LCD is crap with the smearing effects caused by slow refresh rates. My LCDs show no such effects. CRT is the way to go .... along with stone axes ... it provides a far superior picture. I've never seen picture on any CRT as good as my LCDs. |
HD Petition for UK DTT
bronco wrote:
snip LCD is crap with the smearing effects caused by slow refresh rates. Companies stopped making LCD TVs last year anyway, all you're buying now is the stockpiled surplus. snip What absolute bull****! You're either lying or have no ides what you're talking about. |
HD Petition for UK DTT
In
Dr Zoidberg wrote: aa wrote: In bronco wrote: [snip] CRT is the way to go, it provides a far superior picture. SED is a flat CRT technology. There are now other displays being used on camcorders and laptops that use a new generation of LED. So watch out for those too. News to me and assuming correct, good news at that! Thanks bronco. No , bronco keeps posting the same misinformed tat over and over again Ok, thanks! -- aa |
HD Petition for UK DTT
"Rod L." wrote in message ... "Mark Carver" wrote in message ... This has been posted in another group I subscribe to. There is a petition regarding Ofcom's plans to auction the spectrum made available after DSO. http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/openhdtv/ There is also an opportunity to respond to the DDR (Digital Dividend Review) proposal by using the on-line form found he http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/ddr/howtorespond/form -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. I'd rather they used a large portion of the available bandwidth to increase the bit rates of the existing freeview channels. Agreed. |
HD Petition for UK DTT
In article , Pyriform
writes bronco wrote: When LCD is out of the way and SED and others are at the right price we might be able to move on. LCD is crap with the smearing effects caused by slow refresh rates. Companies stopped making LCD TVs last year anyway, all you're buying now is the stockpiled surplus. No, they didn't. You are spouting utter nonsense. LCD technology continues to improve, and has massive ongoing investment behind it. Your idea that this is just some anti-consumer conspiracy is ridiculous. CRT is the way to go, it provides a far superior picture. No, it doesn't. It has plenty of flaws of its own. Well until something changes the piccy on my now 10 year old CRT B&O still knocks spots anything I've seen in Curry's, Vomit or Dixons and its still using Analogue PAL;)) -- Tony Sayer |
HD Petition for UK DTT
"tony sayer" wrote in message
In article , Pyriform writes [snip] CRT is the way to go, it provides a far superior picture. No, it doesn't. It has plenty of flaws of its own. Well until something changes the piccy on my now 10 year old CRT B&O still knocks spots anything I've seen in Curry's, Vomit or Dixons and its still using Analogue PAL;)) My friends in San Francisco have a 4 year old Sony CRT HDTV. Pictures I've seen on that knock more than spots off *anything* I've seen in this country. Ivor |
HD Petition for UK DTT
In article , Ivor Jones
writes "tony sayer" wrote in message In article , Pyriform writes [snip] CRT is the way to go, it provides a far superior picture. No, it doesn't. It has plenty of flaws of its own. Well until something changes the piccy on my now 10 year old CRT B&O still knocks spots anything I've seen in Curry's, Vomit or Dixons and its still using Analogue PAL;)) My friends in San Francisco have a 4 year old Sony CRT HDTV. Pictures I've seen on that knock more than spots off *anything* I've seen in this country. Ivor Well I expect it would. We're long overdue for an *improvement* in picture quality and programs for that matter;)... -- Tony Sayer |
HD Petition for UK DTT
Rod L. wrote: "Mark Carver" wrote in message ... This has been posted in another group I subscribe to. There is a petition regarding Ofcom's plans to auction the spectrum made available after DSO. http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/openhdtv/ There is also an opportunity to respond to the DDR (Digital Dividend Review) proposal by using the on-line form found he http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/ddr/howtorespond/form -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. I'd rather they used a large portion of the available bandwidth to increase the bit rates of the existing freeview channels. I'd second that. I saw HD for the first time in Argos last week; ten expensive tvs showing a demonstration disc of houses in Italy apparently. Quite jerky with /lots/ of compression artifacts, really looked very disappointing - especially for a demo. The extra resolution seemed to be ,just gobbled up with ringing. Too much colour too. |
HD Petition for UK DTT
Rod L. wrote:
I'd rather they used a large portion of the available bandwidth to increase the bit rates of the existing freeview channels. Agreed! I think the producers and directors need to be persuaded to abandon film effect and shakycam too!! |
HD Petition for UK DTT
tony sayer wrote: My friends in San Francisco have a 4 year old Sony CRT HDTV. Pictures I've seen on that knock more than spots off *anything* I've seen in this country. Well I expect it would. We're long overdue for an *improvement* in picture quality and programs for that matter;)... Don't hold your breath! J |
HD Petition for UK DTT
|
HD Petition for UK DTT
"tony sayer" wrote in message
In article , Ivor Jones writes [snip] My friends in San Francisco have a 4 year old Sony CRT HDTV. Pictures I've seen on that knock more than spots off *anything* I've seen in this country. Ivor Well I expect it would. We're long overdue for an *improvement* in picture quality and programs for that matter;)... Ah, the latter point is one where sadly they fall rather short of expectations..! Ivor |
HD Petition for UK DTT
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com