|
So THAT's what the locked half of the HD is for on a Sky + box - VOD
"JohnW" wrote in message ... "Ed" wrote in message ups.com... Heracles Pollux wrote: "Max Demian" wrote in message ... "Ed" wrote in message oups.com http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix....rint&ID=945710 ...in 2007, Sky will introduce a new enhancement giving Sky+ customers the chance to enjoy a selection of the week's best programmes on-demand. The service will be available to more than one million Sky+ and Sky HD customers from launch, making use of additional recording capacity on the hard drive of more recent boxes. If it has to record "a selection of the week's best programmes"[1] on the HD first, it's not "on-demand". [1] IOW, dross. True on-demand allows the customer to choose what he wants, including rare, unpopular stuff. -- Max Demian Interesting, and will merely browsing one minute of these programmes be counted as share / reach? Do bears **** in the woods. ;-) Also it says it will be 'available' to 'more than 1 million' Sky+ viewers. As there are over 2 million active Sky+ boxes, why only half? Presumably the other half have the type of boxes that allow access to the whole drive. Good call. It is only the PVR3 and HD boxes. Up to PVR2.5 (Thompson 160) there was no reserved space. In fact, I suspect it is more than half who don't have PVR3 as most of the recent cut price install offers have been PVR2 refurbs. |
So THAT's what the locked half of the HD is for on a Sky + box - VOD
In article , Zero Tolerance
wrote: Presumably the other half have the older Sky+ boxes that don't have a big enough disc to reserve any space on. I have a Sky+160 - for which I paid good money - and all the space is available to me (not that I've ever filled it). I should be rather annoyed to half the space confiscated so that Sky could fill it up with rubbish that I certainly wouldn't want to watch. |
So THAT's what the locked half of the HD is for on a Sky + box - VOD
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:48:44 -0000, "Heracles Pollux"
wrote: Topfield's 160GB / 250GB TF5800PVR reserves 0% space. Sadly it only picks up crappy channels. :-) -- |
So THAT's what the locked half of the HD is for on a Sky + box - VOD
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 10:32:26 GMT, Roger Wilmut
wrote: I have a Sky+160 - for which I paid good money - and all the space is available to me (not that I've ever filled it). I should be rather annoyed to half the space confiscated so that Sky could fill it up with rubbish that I certainly wouldn't want to watch. Rightly so. But as I understand it, that's not the plan. You paid for 160 and that's what you get. On these other boxes, people paid for 80 and that's what they'll get. It just happens that those boxes have another hidden 80 which can be used for stuff like this. Will be interesting to see whether they offer any good programmes or not, though. -- |
So THAT's what the locked half of the HD is for on a Sky + box - VOD
Angus Rae wrote:
ABC wrote: "Mike Redrobe" wrote in message Still 5 years behind Tivo then... http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/05...tivo_recorders / I wonder if it will go down any better when sky do it. But with the TiVo, the space occupied by the downloaded programme was part of the viewers hdd space. Sky's version will use the portion of the hdd which isn't currently used by viewers. That's exactly what TiVo did too. There's a very small portion of the TiVo HDD reserved for that purpose. A lot of the media flap about that whole "Dossa and Joe" thing was actually completely wrong; it didn't take any user usable space on the HDD and it only recorded it if the TiVo was idle (i.e. not scheduled to record anything during the length of the programme, and also either in standby or not having had a user input for 30 minutes - i.e. when it would have been available to record suggestions anyway) so it didn't hijack the TiVo at all. The only users who would have noticed any different behaviour were those with suggestions turned off. The real problems were a) it wasn't used on UK TiVos from day 1, so users weren't expecting it and b) the programme chosen was absolutely dire. And the programme was on BBC2 so was running late, so the TiVo missed the ending! -- Ashley For Windsor Weather see www.snglinks.com/wx |
So THAT's what the locked half of the HD is for on a Sky + box - VOD
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:35:08 +0000, Edster wrote:
As you will no doubt already know since you work for Sky, it will be used to push advertising at viewers. Yes Edster, everyone who doesn't share your paranoid conspiracy theories works for Sky. Of course. -- |
So THAT's what the locked half of the HD is for on a Sky + box - VOD
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:56:10 +0000, Edster wrote:
No, you're the only one who pops up every time Sky thinks of a new way to make money saying that it was obviously an "accident" and they didn't really mean to make money doing it. Like the time they accidentally used the red button graffitti to accidentally advertise pizzas all the way through The Simpsons. Yeah.. Seen it before, or since? No. I didn't think so. Or all the times they accidentally advertise their HD equipment during every programme. Examples? Your constant crusade to leap to the defence of Sky, even over things that are indefensible, is not the action of a normal viewer. Can I just clear something up, are you the same guy who reckons that MI5 is getting BBC Newsreaders to be rude to him in the nine o'clock news? Because you two certainly sound alike... -- |
So THAT's what the locked half of the HD is for on a Sky + box - VOD
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:36:05 +0000, Edster wrote:
I don't watch it any more. I switched to downloading American broadcasts when I found out they didn't have as much writing and other garbage on the screen as the UK broadcasts. Well if you're content with being a criminal, good luck to you. Examples? Every programme doesn't need examples. So no examples, then. -- |
So THAT's what the locked half of the HD is for on a Sky + box - VOD
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:55:26 +0000, Edster wrote:
Well if you're content with being a criminal, good luck to you. Sky using on screen advertising during programmes is supposed to be illegal as well, but nobody seems to care about that either. Yet you seem to be unable to provide any examples. If you had a longer attention span you would have read further and seen that I said just choose any programme at random for your example. "Officer! Officer! Just go out into the street. Pick anyone at random. They're all breaking the law. What's that? You want me to be specific? Otherwise I'm just wasting your time? Well!" -- |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com