|
DISH Network/DirecTV Merger?
In alt.dbs.directv Mike T. wrote:
No, until you consider that "digital" is twice the cost, and not really "digital". So what are you paying for, exactly? -Dave The digital tier is indeed all digital. It is on top of the analog tier which can be purchased without the digital tier. BTW ... Comcast is offering 100% digital television now in select markets. They do this as a digital overlay, and it requires the correct equipment to view it. I had the Motorola 3412 DVR (which sucked by the way), and it was a digital only receiver that utilized the digital overlay rather than the analog channels of traditional origin. -- Thomas T. Veldhouse Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1 |
DISH Network/DirecTV Merger?...Crossposter Bill R
In alt.dbs.directv Bob wrote:
Doesn't work that way here in Chicago. You can't do any of your own work during the construction. The builder installs it all, pre-drywall. And makes a nice profit on it too. My Uncle did it 15 or 20 years back, in his home in Glenview (or is it Glenwood) up north a bit in the burbs. He installed coax and the builder finished behind him. I believe it required inspection like all other wiring, but beyond that, it is possible. -- Thomas T. Veldhouse Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1 |
Zymurgy [was DISH Network/DirecTV Merger?...Crossposter Bill R]
In alt.dbs.directv Zymergy wrote:
A p.s. to above. If you build a new house make sure you ask them to run electric wires seperate from Audio/Video cables. I know not everyone is well educated but damn. I had to make DTV guy pull 50ft of wire he ran because he ran it with all the electric wires. And he looked at me like I was crazy. I don't care how insulated it is I don't want it run that way. They used cheap r6 wire to begin with. Hell I broke a line just putting a new fitting on the end. Curious, did you pick your name to honor the art of brewing beer? If so, then you should be spelling it Zymurgy. I wouldn't normally pick on this .. but I am a homebrewer and quite familiar :-) -- Thomas T. Veldhouse Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1 |
DISH Network/DirecTV Merger?...Crossposter Bill R
In alt.dbs.directv John Wonderly wrote:
I would hate to reward Comcrap after all those years they and their predecessors couldn't get me a decent picture over their cheap, pos lines. Indeed, times change. I stuck to OTA [after I moved away from my folks] until 1998. Then I got cable for the year [to get a one way cable modem .. .with a phone uplink using MediaOne] and then finally went to DirecTV and US West DSL in 1999 and ditched cable until this year. Times change, companies change and their products change. -- Thomas T. Veldhouse Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1 |
DISH Network/DirecTV Merger?
In alt.dbs.directv Zymergy wrote:
What they need to do is offer Digital and HDTV channels cheaper than competitors. I do care if I'm paying $70 for a package when I can get the same for $50 from another supplier. If FIOS-TV comes in cheaper, but only have 5 HDTV channels I won't be switching unless they come up with some really creative pricing schemes. What is helping DBS operators right now is that the HD programming is limitted to begin with; there are only a handful of channels worth watching on any regular basis. Once that list grows, only those with bandwidth resources will be able to offer all that is available and those without will be left in the dust. To rise to the competition, DBS operators need bandwidth resources, and eliminating all of the redundancy between competing DBS operators will free up significant bandwidth. This means combining forces AND moving ahead and not supporting legacy services OR it means that additional spectrum be made available to them. -- Thomas T. Veldhouse Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1 |
DISH Network/DirecTV Merger?...Crossposter Bill R
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 15:37:30 -0400, Mike T. wrote:
Of course not, it requires fiber. My point was, many house builders are already considering the telephone company to be a quaint leftover from decades ago, and no longer necessary, so they aren't building in support for phone services when they build. Fair enough. But are you drawing a correlation between the reduced support for phone services and a reduced pool of FiOS customers? If so, I don't see the connection. -- cc |
DISH Network/DirecTV Merger?...Crossposter Bill R
Fair enough. But are you drawing a correlation between the reduced
support for phone services and a reduced pool of FiOS customers? If so, I don't see the connection. There's a pretty direct connection. If the house is wired for service of any kind from the phone company, then they (the phone company) have their foot in the door. If there's no "phone" service in the building, you might not think to call the phone company when you are shopping for television programming. (well, readers of this ng might) If you HAVE phone service, then the FIOS ads (for example) are going to be in your mailbox every month. So when you are shopping for television programming (new, or switching providers), FIOS is more likely to be something you might look into. -Dave |
DISH Network/DirecTV Merger?...Crossposter Bill R
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote in message ... In alt.dbs.directv Bob wrote: Doesn't work that way here in Chicago. You can't do any of your own work during the construction. The builder installs it all, pre-drywall. And makes a nice profit on it too. My Uncle did it 15 or 20 years back, in his home in Glenview (or is it Glenwood) up north a bit in the burbs. He installed coax and the builder finished behind him. I believe it required inspection like all other wiring, but beyond that, it is possible. Wouldn't work that way today. |
DISH Network/DirecTV Merger?...Crossposter Bill R
In alt.dbs.echostar Bob wrote:
finished behind him. I believe it required inspection like all other wiring, but beyond that, it is possible. Wouldn't work that way today. Why? Because your builder did it for you or because you know of some requirement by the local government or state government banning it? I suspect the former in all honesty. -- Thomas T. Veldhouse Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1 |
DISH Network/DirecTV Merger?...Crossposter Bill R
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:15:46 -0400, Mike T. wrote:
There's a pretty direct connection. If the house is wired for service of any kind from the phone company, then they (the phone company) have their foot in the door. If there's no "phone" service in the building, you might not think to call the phone company when you are shopping for television programming. I disagree. For now, Verizon's direct marketing strategy seems to be: After Verizon completes the fiber network wiring and testing in a neighborhood, direct mailings go out to all addresses within that install area and door tags are hung on each door. Additionally, UPS envelopes (yes, that little brown truck) are then sent as a follow-up announcing the availability of Internet and (in those areas where the video franchise has been approved) TV services. As far as the install goes, no preexisting wiring is needed or required. At day of install, fiber is run to the house, an optical network terminal is installed, and cat 5 is run to the computer and (presumably) all TV locations. Verizon also tosses in a free wireless router for the computer. My install took two techs almost an entire day. It is absolutely mind blowing how much money Verizon is spending on the installation and marketing of FiOS. Oh, and the product itself, be it Internet access or TV, is superior to and priced at or even below its competitors. -- cc |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com