BBC Points-Of-View Promise on DOGs - Is my recollection correct?
 

"Pyriform" wrote in message
...
Hercule ******** wrote:
Firstly I will not pay the TV Licence whilst the BBC uses DOGs nor
watch DOG disfigured services.

That's your latest excuse for your criminality, is it?

Have you told the electors yet?




You may call it what you like. I have the cash and they don't, until they
offer services that are not ruined.

BBC Points-Of-View Promise on DOGs - Is my recollection correct?
 

Heracles Pollux wrote:
"Pyriform" wrote
Hercule ******** wrote:
Firstly I will not pay the TV Licence whilst the BBC uses DOGs nor
watch DOG disfigured services.

That's your latest excuse for your criminality, is it?

Have you told the electors yet?

You may call it what you like. I have the cash and they don't, until
they offer services that are not ruined.

Oh, right. So if the BBC removed the DOGs from all their channels, you'd
stop being a thieving scumbag?

No, I thought not.

Have you told the electors yet?

BBC Points-Of-View Promise on DOGs - Is my recollection correct?
 

"Pyriform" wrote in message
...
Heracles Pollux wrote:
"Pyriform" wrote
Hercule ******** wrote:
Firstly I will not pay the TV Licence whilst the BBC uses DOGs nor
watch DOG disfigured services.

That's your latest excuse for your criminality, is it?

Have you told the electors yet?

You may call it what you like. I have the cash and they don't, until
they offer services that are not ruined.

Oh, right. So if the BBC removed the DOGs from all their channels, you'd
stop being a thieving scumbag?

No, I thought not.

Have you told the electors yet?


Kill-filed for being rude.

BBC Points-Of-View Promise on DOGs - Is my recollection correct?
 

Heracles Pollux wrote:
"Pyriform" wrote
Heracles Pollux wrote:
"Pyriform" wrote
Hercule ******** wrote:
Firstly I will not pay the TV Licence whilst the BBC uses DOGs nor
watch DOG disfigured services.

That's your latest excuse for your criminality, is it?

Have you told the electors yet?

You may call it what you like. I have the cash and they don't, until
they offer services that are not ruined.

Oh, right. So if the BBC removed the DOGs from all their channels,
you'd stop being a thieving scumbag?

No, I thought not.

Have you told the electors yet?


Kill-filed for being rude.

The truth hurts, I know.

Kill-filing will not inconvenience me in the slightest. You never provide
satisfactory answers, so my questions might as well be rhetorical. I'll
continue to pose them in order that anyone else reading threads you choose
to contribute to will know the truth. Your silence will provide eloquent
confirmation that I am right!

BBC Points-Of-View Promise on DOGs - Is my recollection correct?
 

Heracles Pollux wrote:
"Pyriform" wrote in message
...
Heracles Pollux wrote:
"Pyriform" wrote
Hercule ******** wrote:
Firstly I will not pay the TV Licence whilst the BBC uses DOGs nor
watch DOG disfigured services.

That's your latest excuse for your criminality, is it?

Have you told the electors yet?

You may call it what you like. I have the cash and they don't, until
they offer services that are not ruined.

Oh, right. So if the BBC removed the DOGs from all their channels,
you'd stop being a thieving scumbag?

No, I thought not.

Have you told the electors yet?


Kill-filed for being rude.

You mean kill-filed for telling the truth.

BBC Points-Of-View Promise on DOGs - Is my recollection correct?
 

"Adrian A" wrote in message
...
Heracles Pollux wrote:
"Pyriform" wrote in message
...
Heracles Pollux wrote:
"Pyriform" wrote
Hercule ******** wrote:
Firstly I will not pay the TV Licence whilst the BBC uses DOGs nor
watch DOG disfigured services.

That's your latest excuse for your criminality, is it?

Have you told the electors yet?

You may call it what you like. I have the cash and they don't, until
they offer services that are not ruined.

Oh, right. So if the BBC removed the DOGs from all their channels,
you'd stop being a thieving scumbag?

No, I thought not.

Have you told the electors yet?


Kill-filed for being rude.

You mean kill-filed for telling the truth.




I'm happy to discuss the issue - unlike the BBC.

However for me to participate, other parties must adhere to a reasonable
standard of civility, courtesy, and politeness.

And let's discuss the truth like gentleman.

BBC Points-Of-View Promise on DOGs - Is my recollection correct?
 

Heracles Pollux wrote:
And let's discuss the truth like gentleman.

That's easy. The truth is that the law of the land (of which you claim to be
"an elected public servant") requires you to purchase a TV licence. You
refuse to do this, citing a whole panoply of excuses - of which your DOG
phobia is only the most recent.

That makes you a criminal. You should tell the electors.

anti BBC tirade
 

"Edster" wrote in message
...
"Pyriform" wrote in message

The truth is that the law of the land (of which you claim to be
"an elected public servant") requires you to purchase a TV licence.

Only if you have a TV or TV signal receiving equipment.



The law may "require" one to purchase a licence.

"Requiring" and doing are separate matters of course.

Generally people pay taxes and fees because they feel a benefit from doing
so outweighing the cost of not doing so. Knowing that were I to pay the BBC,
they would **** it away on Mark Byford, Jonathan Woss, pointless
advertising, their grafitti strewn digital plan, soap operas and tedious
dramas, biased news, politically correct idents, junkettes for their
super-annuated staff, and bidding against other UK broadcasters for rights,
let's just leave this to be a matter for the Courts and "criminal justice
system".

;-)

BBC Points-Of-View Promise on DOGs - Is my recollection correct?
 

On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:37:26 GMT, Edster wrote:

"Pyriform" wrote in message

The truth is that the law of the land (of which you claim to be
"an elected public servant") requires you to purchase a TV licence.

Only if you have a TV or TV signal receiving equipment.

.... which has been installed for the relevant purposes, not merely
possessed.
--
_______
+---------------------------------------------------+ |\\ //|
| Charles Ellson: | | \\ // |
+---------------------------------------------------+ | |
| // \\ |
Alba gu brath |//___\\|

anti BBC tirade
 

Hi,

Just interested, and apologies if you've answered this elsewhere, but can
you honestly say that you NEVER watch any of BBCs output?

Cheers,

Chris.

"Heracles Pollux" wrote in message
...

"Edster" wrote in message
...
"Pyriform" wrote in message

The truth is that the law of the land (of which you claim to be
"an elected public servant") requires you to purchase a TV licence.

Only if you have a TV or TV signal receiving equipment.



The law may "require" one to purchase a licence.

"Requiring" and doing are separate matters of course.

Generally people pay taxes and fees because they feel a benefit from doing
so outweighing the cost of not doing so. Knowing that were I to pay the
BBC, they would **** it away on Mark Byford, Jonathan Woss, pointless
advertising, their grafitti strewn digital plan, soap operas and tedious
dramas, biased news, politically correct idents, junkettes for their
super-annuated staff, and bidding against other UK broadcasters for
rights, let's just leave this to be a matter for the Courts and "criminal
justice system".

;-)