|
USB tv tuners: Tried one?
has anyone her had real world experience with USB tv
tuners in their laptops? see link http://www.tv-cards.com/index.php#358 |
USB tv tuners: Tried one?
Haven't used that device, but I have an ATI USB card. Does an OK job,
but drops a lot of frames when capturing full resolution (analog only). Just viewing doesn't show any problems. However, analog tv looks terrible on my laptop's display. I'm sure it is the LCD and not the capture device, because I've sent captured files to my desktop and they look fine. Since I bought the card to do a quick quality check (instead of carrying a test set with me), I was very disapointed. Make sure you can return if it doesn't meet your needs. |
USB tv tuners: Tried one?
|
USB tv tuners: Tried one?
Fred Martin wrote:
I have the FusionHD that you can see he http://www.fusionhdtv.co.kr/eng/Products/HDTV5usb.aspx It works fine with my laptop. ....Fred Very cool!! You are happy with the unit? And this works for HD off air programming in the USA, right? |
USB tv tuners: Tried one?
I bought a USB tuner from circuit city awhile back, and never could get
the audio and video to be in-synch. |
USB tv tuners: Tried one?
wrote in message
... has anyone her had real world experience with USB tv tuners in their laptops? see link http://www.tv-cards.com/index.php#358 I have a Vbox atsc usb tuner, It works real well. Using Beyond Tv Se for viewing. I do not have a media center computer and I am using a silver sensor Ant. picking up stations appox. 50 miles away with no pre amp. |
USB tv tuners: Tried one?
"bordman" wrote in message ups.com... I bought a USB tuner from circuit city awhile back, and never could get the audio and video to be in-synch. Same here. With a 3400+ 64 bit AMD chip, the PC should have been fast enough, but I had the same sync problem, plus dropouts. Took it back and got an Adaptec PCI card. Works like a charm. Unfortunately, that is not an option for a laptop. There may be other USB tuners that work. Mine had next to no parts in it, although at $99 it was not all that cheap. I bought it to digitize Hi8 video tapes. Tam |
USB tv tuners: Tried one?
wrote in message ... "Tam/WB2TT" wrote: Same here. With a 3400+ 64 bit AMD chip, the PC should have been fast enough, but I had the same sync problem, plus dropouts. Took it back and got an Adaptec PCI card. Works like a charm. Unfortunately, that is not an option for a laptop. There may be other USB tuners that work. Mine had next to no parts in it, although at $99 it was not all that cheap. I bought it to digitize Hi8 video tapes. So you think even USB2 is too slow for TV usage? and PCI is better yet? I wish I could remember the brand of USB tuner I got, but it had about 1/8 the number of components that the Adaptec PCI card has. Since it has to contain virtually a complete TV receiver, there is only so far you can go with integrating it. USB itself should be fast enough, because some camcorders connect via USB, though my Canon uses Firewire. I would try and find user opinions on any USB box you are considering, and try to buy it locally with the understanding that you can return it. I had no problem returning it to CompUSA. It was not HD, just a plain NTSC with antenna, SVideo and composite inputs. Tam |
USB tv tuners: Tried one?
"Tam/WB2TT" wrote:
I wish I could remember the brand of USB tuner I got, but it had about 1/8 the number of components that the Adaptec PCI card has. Since it has to contain virtually a complete TV receiver, there is only so far you can go with integrating it. Ahh...so its more the physical smallness of USB based tuners that you feel is there downfall? Not enough room for the components necessary to work well? yes? |
USB tv tuners: Tried one?
wrote in message ... "Tam/WB2TT" wrote: I wish I could remember the brand of USB tuner I got, but it had about 1/8 the number of components that the Adaptec PCI card has. Since it has to contain virtually a complete TV receiver, there is only so far you can go with integrating it. Ahh...so its more the physical smallness of USB based tuners that you feel is there downfall? Not enough room for the components necessary to work well? yes? The box was the size of a small paperback book. The circuit board had about 4 chips on it, none very big. Anyhow, the thing did not work well. Tam |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com