|
Wait until Sky sees this ...
"Edster" wrote in message ... "Tumbleweed" wrote in message Oner thing they have considered is a different ad that only comes up when you fast forward. Telling you that you're missing the only bit of entertainment you're ever likely to get that doesn't have on screen logos and other assorted crap? Yep, it will probably say 'our monitoring of your viewing suggests that you have missed this fine selection of DOGs and obtrusive spinning adverts for future programs." :-) -- Tumbleweed email replies not necessary but to contact use; tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com |
Wait until Sky sees this ...
"Zero Tolerance" wrote in message ... On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:14:06 +0100, "Heracles Pollux" wrote: I'd personally invest in a Mercedes-Benz of the TV broadcast business if one ever emerges here. It won't happen due to the problem of the ****-bags who control the channels, are also the ****-bags who control the supply of content. Or alternatively because there's just no significant market for it? -- The US channels such as HBO and Universal HD seem to make excellent content and profit and broadcast without DOGs. |
Wait until Sky sees this ...
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 13:55:16 +0100, "Heracles Pollux"
wrote: The US channels such as HBO and Universal HD seem to make excellent content and profit and broadcast without DOGs. As does Sky Movies. What's your point? -- |
Wait until Sky sees this ...
"Zero Tolerance" wrote in message ... On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 13:55:16 +0100, "Heracles Pollux" wrote: The US channels such as HBO and Universal HD seem to make excellent content and profit and broadcast without DOGs. As does Sky Movies. What's your point? -- What do you think? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com