|
Sky HD extra Sub not set in stone
loz wrote:
This is such an old arguement it isn't worth having all over again. Yes, it is. This is the way it is with Sky+. You either take or you leave it. Ostrich. -- Digibox problem? : A reboot solves 90% of these. The Sky Digital FAQ: http://tinyurl.com/8vef5 UK TV overseas: http://tinyurl.com/6p73 BBC reception questions? ; http://www.astra2d.com/ Fed up with on-screen logos? : http://logofreetv.org/ ---- Only the truth as I see it. No monies return'd. ;-) |
Sky HD extra Sub not set in stone
|
Sky HD extra Sub not set in stone
Mal Franks wrote:
The purchaser has already paid fully for both functions and therefore should have full use of them without any monthly fee. Well having a 2nd tuner does mean that you can watch one set of programmes and record another simultanously, normally this would have entailed the purchase of a 2nd digibox and a 2nd subscription. Maybe, but you can only output one at a time. Therefore the net result is the same. When one considers that virtually every programme on a pay channel is repeated endlessly you are in fact paying £10 for timeshifting, not for two tuners. So I can see the point of charging £10 for access to a 2nd subscription, I can see *a* point though I don't think that it is particularly valid. however if you don't pay the £10 IMHO they should allow you to at least record to the hard disk but stop access to the 2nd tuner or limit you to one subscription channel and one FTA channel perhaps. Indeed. -- Digibox problem? : A reboot solves 90% of these. The Sky Digital FAQ: http://tinyurl.com/8vef5 UK TV overseas: http://tinyurl.com/6p73 BBC reception questions? ; http://www.astra2d.com/ Fed up with on-screen logos? : http://logofreetv.org/ ---- Only the truth as I see it. No monies return'd. ;-) |
Sky HD extra Sub not set in stone
"Jomtien" wrote in message ... This is such an old arguement it isn't worth having all over again. Yes, it is. No it isn't. It isn't important. Global warming is important. What Sky charge to record TV programmes isn't This is the way it is with Sky+. You either take or you leave it. Ostrich. No. I just decided to get on with life rather than still argue there should be no Sky+ sub after 2 years of doing so. I was like you very critical for a long time in this forum of the Sky+ sub. But I decided to move on. As it is, I don't pay it anyway because of my subscription package. So it is doubly not worth argueing about any more - at least from my perspective Loz |
Sky HD extra Sub not set in stone
"loz" wrote in message ... No it isn't. It isn't important. Global warming is important. What Sky charge to record TV programmes isn't No its not. it does not matter what you do, one day that big yellow ball in the sky will explode and so will the earth. Global warming will matter not a jot. Just enjoy your won time on this planet and **** the rest :-) |
Sky HD extra Sub not set in stone
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:27:48 +0100 "olympus"
waved a wand and this message magically appeared: Just enjoy your won time on this planet and **** the rest :-) Your children (if any) won't thank you for that. -- http://www.munted.org.uk I have always found Scotland fascinating. They take barley and water and create something more expensive than petrol - Kwame Owino |
Sky HD extra Sub not set in stone
"Alex Buell" wrote in message .uk... On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:27:48 +0100 "olympus" waved a wand and this message magically appeared: Just enjoy your won time on this planet and **** the rest :-) Your children (if any) won't thank you for that. Why not? it aint gonna come to an end in their lifetime, or they could die in the next sixty seconds. Stop worrying about how you are gonna die, the fact is that you, your children and their children will die regardless of global warming or not. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com