|
Sky Plus box question
I have just been given a Sky Plus box. We already have an ordinary Sky
subscription. I'm not exactly clear how I stand with this. Can I just plug in the Sky Plus box, put in the card from the ordinary box and just run a 2nd. coax down from my dish into the Plus box? I get the impression that I have to inform Sky and plug in a telephone connection and no doubt pay them some money. Rather than ask Sky about this (who obviously will be biased) can anybody tell me the best course of action with this? Thanks |
Sky Plus box question
"Pete L" wrote in message
oups.com... I have just been given a Sky Plus box. We already have an ordinary Sky subscription. I'm not exactly clear how I stand with this. Can I just plug in the Sky Plus box, put in the card from the ordinary box and just run a 2nd. coax down from my dish into the Plus box? I get the impression that I have to inform Sky and plug in a telephone connection and no doubt pay them some money. Rather than ask Sky about this (who obviously will be biased) can anybody tell me the best course of action with this? Thanks Until you inform Sky none of the recording functions will work. Once informed, you'll either have to pay the tenner a month charge, unless its waived because you have 2 or more premium channels. Plus, you'll need a new LNB unless your LNB already has a spare feed on it which is unlikely (I believe) if you have a standard isntallation. And you probably need to get the dish realigned as a result of putting in the new LNB! -- Tumbleweed email replies not necessary but to contact use; tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com |
Sky Plus box question
Thanks for that - My LNB definitely has a spare feed. What about the
telephone connection. I'm not keen on connecting but do Sky insist on it? |
Sky Plus box question
"Pete L" wrote in message ups.com... Thanks for that - My LNB definitely has a spare feed. What about the telephone connection. I'm not keen on connecting but do Sky insist on it? No - you didn't buy it from them Loz |
Sky Plus box question
loz wrote:
Thanks for that - My LNB definitely has a spare feed. What about the telephone connection. I'm not keen on connecting but do Sky insist on it? No - you didn't buy it from them The extremely vague (and hence illegal) T&Cs of the Sky+ appear to require a phone connection for 12 months. In practice you will probably need the phone connection briefly in order to activate the recording functions but once that is done it will never be checked, so it can be removed. -- Digibox problem? : A reboot solves 90% of these. The Sky Digital FAQ: http://tinyurl.com/8vef5 UK TV overseas: http://tinyurl.com/6p73 BBC reception questions? ; http://www.astra2d.com/ Fed up with on-screen logos? : http://logofreetv.org/ ---- Only the truth as I see it. No monies return'd. ;-) |
Sky Plus box question
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:00:58 +0000 (UTC), "loz"
wrote: "Pete L" wrote in message oups.com... Thanks for that - My LNB definitely has a spare feed. What about the telephone connection. I'm not keen on connecting but do Sky insist on it? No - you didn't buy it from them Loz But they still insist on the telephone connection. -- Nigel Barker Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur |
Sky Plus box question
"Jomtien" wrote in message ... loz wrote: Thanks for that - My LNB definitely has a spare feed. What about the telephone connection. I'm not keen on connecting but do Sky insist on it? No - you didn't buy it from them The extremely vague (and hence illegal) T&Cs of the Sky+ LOL. They might be invalid, or disputed, but they wont be 'illegal'. -- Tumbleweed email replies not necessary but to contact use; tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com |
Sky Plus box question
Mike Henry wrote:
the contract doesn't require it unless Sky perform the installation. (Unless they have changed the contract.) The last Sky+ T&Cs I saw were incredibly vague and could be taken either way. -- Digibox problem? : A reboot solves 90% of these. The Sky Digital FAQ: http://tinyurl.com/8vef5 UK TV overseas: http://tinyurl.com/6p73 BBC reception questions? ; http://www.astra2d.com/ Fed up with on-screen logos? : http://logofreetv.org/ ---- Only the truth as I see it. No monies return'd. ;-) |
Sky Plus box question
Tumbleweed wrote:
The extremely vague (and hence illegal) T&Cs of the Sky+ LOL. They might be invalid, or disputed, but they wont be 'illegal'. UK law prohibits unfair contract terms. Terms that are deliberately vague and imprecise could easily be considered unfair and, as such, illegal. -- Digibox problem? : A reboot solves 90% of these. The Sky Digital FAQ: http://tinyurl.com/8vef5 UK TV overseas: http://tinyurl.com/6p73 BBC reception questions? ; http://www.astra2d.com/ Fed up with on-screen logos? : http://logofreetv.org/ ---- Only the truth as I see it. No monies return'd. ;-) |
Sky Plus box question
"Jomtien" wrote in message ... Tumbleweed wrote: The extremely vague (and hence illegal) T&Cs of the Sky+ LOL. They might be invalid, or disputed, but they wont be 'illegal'. UK law prohibits unfair contract terms. Terms that are deliberately vague and imprecise could easily be considered unfair and, as such, illegal. a **** load of assumptions there; 1) that they are *deliberately* vague and imprecise....that would take a lot of proving, if only because millions have signed them and no one has taken SKy to court so far (AFAIK) so very few people have considered them imprecise. 2) That that is illegal to be deliberately vague. 3) That that aspect of the ts&Cs themselves, are unfair. They could be vague but not unfair. 4) That that is illegal, rather than null and void. IANAL but AIUI, unfair ts&Cs are not 'illegal' they are simply invalid and dont apply. Its as if they werent there at all. In other words, someone could have Ts&Cs in small print that you never saw when signing, that said 'Jomtien must sacrifice his first born to me if he ever mentions Tivo again' but the only effect of that would be that they dont count. -- Tumbleweed email replies not necessary but to contact use; tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com |
Sky Plus box question
Tumbleweed wrote:
UK law prohibits unfair contract terms. Terms that are deliberately vague and imprecise could easily be considered unfair and, as such, illegal. a **** load of assumptions there; 1) that they are *deliberately* vague and imprecise....that would take a lot of proving, if only because millions have signed them and no one has taken SKy to court so far (AFAIK) so very few people have considered them imprecise. Few people complained about slavery and the way the British government controlled the opium trade. That doesn't make either any less true. 99% of people never complain about anything, as is well known. I find it hard to imagine that anyone could be so incompetent as to create such imprecise contract terms by accident. 2) That that is illegal to be deliberately vague. 3) That that aspect of the ts&Cs themselves, are unfair. They could be vague but not unfair. 4) That that is illegal, rather than null and void. IANAL but AIUI, unfair ts&Cs are not 'illegal' they are simply invalid and dont apply. Its as if they werent there at all. I refer you to the Fair Trading Act and the Unfair Contract Terms Act. -- Digibox problem? : A reboot solves 90% of these. The Sky Digital FAQ: http://tinyurl.com/8vef5 UK TV overseas: http://tinyurl.com/6p73 BBC reception questions? ; http://www.astra2d.com/ Fed up with on-screen logos? : http://logofreetv.org/ ---- Only the truth as I see it. No monies return'd. ;-) |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com