The Norman Baker TV Standby Mode Challenge
 

Johnny B Good wrote:
The message
from "Pyriform" contains these words:

====snip====

I wonder how much energy (food/fuel/computing/paper etc) she uses to
tell people this? I did try to measure the 'pseudo-off' power
consumption of my PC, but found it was less than my power meter is
capable of registering.

FYI, this is typically 4 watts. I've observed "off" power consumption
in the range 1 to 8 watts on PCs that _aren't_ faulty.

Mine must be unusually efficient then!

The Norman Baker TV Standby Mode Challenge
 

The message
from "Pyriform" contains these words:

Johnny B Good wrote:
The message
from "Pyriform" contains these words:

====snip====

I wonder how much energy (food/fuel/computing/paper etc) she uses to
tell people this? I did try to measure the 'pseudo-off' power
consumption of my PC, but found it was less than my power meter is
capable of registering.

FYI, this is typically 4 watts. I've observed "off" power consumption
in the range 1 to 8 watts on PCs that _aren't_ faulty.

Mine must be unusually efficient then!

Either that, or your 'power meter' is one of those that fails to
register anything below 7 watts. :-)

--
Regards, John.

To reply directly, please remove "buttplug" .Mail via the
"Reply Direct" button and Spam-bots will be rejected.

The Norman Baker TV Standby Mode Challenge
 

The Philips website lists them under "Specifications" for each set.

Most sets appear to be 1W in standby.

Thanks - that's useful information.

Paul DS.

The Norman Baker TV Standby Mode Challenge
 

In article , Pyriform wrote:
What they're really trying to say is that the amount of *energy*
consumed is related to the *power* consumption (which could equally
well be called "energy rate") and the amount of time the equipment
consumes energy at that rate.

You're right, of course. I knew that, but ended up compounding the
confusion by my sloppy wording. Do you think it would help if we
measured the energy consumed in joules? Or perhaps calories? Everyone
knows what they are...

We could. It would be perfectly valid, but the kilowatt-hour, or kWh, or
"unit" seems to be the usual measure of electrical energy. It's the one
that appears on our electricity bills, so I would expect everybody to
know, at least in a practical sense, what they are.

Rod.

The Norman Baker TV Standby Mode Challenge
 

" wrote in message
ups.com...
It's not as if someone is making you use an STB. Oh, they are...


I hadn't thought of that. What a good point.

Just about every DTT STB I have seen is without a power switch, so unless
people are going to switch them off at the wall, that's a lot of STBs all
sitting on standby - and an increasing number at that. Also, in most homes,
I'm sure you'll find the STB, TV, Video/PVR and DVD all plugged into a 4-way
adaptor and powered from one wall socket, and will therefore be left with
power all the time for the benefit of the recorder.

It seems to me that Sky+ users have the most energy efficient setup - one
box which needs stand-by mode and the rest can be powered off. Until DTT
PVRs with dual tuners become the norm rather than separate STBs all over the
place. I'm still waiting for one with a DVD recorder to appear at a
mass-market price.

The key to all this is reducing the silver box-count, in addition to turning
the telly off at night...

Adrian

The Norman Baker TV Standby Mode Challenge
 

Johnny B Good wrote:
I wonder how much energy (food/fuel/computing/paper etc) she uses
to tell people this? I did try to measure the 'pseudo-off' power
consumption of my PC, but found it was less than my power meter is
capable of registering.

FYI, this is typically 4 watts. I've observed "off" power
consumption in the range 1 to 8 watts on PCs that _aren't_ faulty.

Mine must be unusually efficient then!

Either that, or your 'power meter' is one of those that fails to
register anything below 7 watts. :-)

Hardly likely, given that I routinely use it to measure standby powers
of 1 or 2 watts.

The Norman Baker TV Standby Mode Challenge
 

Roderick Stewart wrote:
In article , Pyriform wrote:
What they're really trying to say is that the amount of *energy*
consumed is related to the *power* consumption (which could equally
well be called "energy rate") and the amount of time the equipment
consumes energy at that rate.

You're right, of course. I knew that, but ended up compounding the
confusion by my sloppy wording. Do you think it would help if we
measured the energy consumed in joules? Or perhaps calories? Everyone
knows what they are...

We could. It would be perfectly valid, but the kilowatt-hour, or kWh, or
"unit" seems to be the usual measure of electrical energy. It's the one
that appears on our electricity bills, so I would expect everybody to
know, at least in a practical sense, what they are.

A kWh is 1000 joules isn't it, or is it 3600000 joules, I suspect it's
the second actually. 1 joule = 1 watt for a second. Thus 1kwh is
1000 * 3600 joules. So, essentially, kwh are joules with a different
name. 1kwh = 3.6Mj

--
Chris Green

The Norman Baker TV Standby Mode Challenge
 

The Norman Baker TV Standby Mode Challenge
 

The Norman Baker TV Standby Mode Challenge
 

In article [email protected], Adrian B wrote:
Just about every DTT STB I have seen is without a power switch, so unless
people are going to switch them off at the wall, that's a lot of STBs all
sitting on standby - and an increasing number at that.

Wouldn't a tuner need to be in standby anyway for the timer to work?

Also, in most homes,
I'm sure you'll find the STB, TV, Video/PVR and DVD all plugged into a 4-way
adaptor and powered from one wall socket, and will therefore be left with
power all the time for the benefit of the recorder.

All the more reason to get an "Intelligent Mains Extension Lead" from Maplins.
The catalogue number is L22BK, and it costs 29.99GBP. The one showing on their
web site is slightly different from the ones I have (which only cost 24.99), as
it now includes a telephone and modem splitter, though I've also seen them in
DIY shops so you may be able to get the cheaper ones too.

Rod.