|
|
Subwoofer Broken?
|
Subwoofer Broken?
Spam Catcher wrote:
wrote in news:1131419561.625777.127110 @f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com: 1.) Is the amp in my subwoofer broken or not working properly? 2.) Is the cable I used insufficient for carrying the signal to my sub? 3.) Is it possible that the output on the reciever is broken or not working properly? Most likely your receiver speaker settings are wrong - You might have to configure your speaker size to "small" - otherwise all bass is being sent to your front speakers not your sub. Also, check if you need to enable the sub out in your receiver. And maybe check the sub-pre-out volumes. I have all of my speakers set to large and my subs work with no problem. Maybe the problem is the crossover frequency. |
Subwoofer Broken?
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:16:24 -0800, "L Alpert"
wrote: Spam Catcher wrote: wrote in news:1131419561.625777.127110 @f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com: 1.) Is the amp in my subwoofer broken or not working properly? 2.) Is the cable I used insufficient for carrying the signal to my sub? 3.) Is it possible that the output on the reciever is broken or not working properly? Most likely your receiver speaker settings are wrong - You might have to configure your speaker size to "small" - otherwise all bass is being sent to your front speakers not your sub. Also, check if you need to enable the sub out in your receiver. And maybe check the sub-pre-out volumes. I have all of my speakers set to large and my subs work with no problem. Maybe the problem is the crossover frequency. That functionality varies from receiver to receiver. The best way to be certain is to set them to small, even if just to test. Kal |
Subwoofer Broken?
In case I wasn't clear, this is an actual subwoofer. On the front of
the cabinet it says "Philips SW-090 Powered Subwoofer." From what I've been able to dig up online, it has a 90-watt amp. This should provide fairly decent bass in a small room (bedroom) shouldn't it? That is, if it's working properly... |
Subwoofer Broken?
|
Subwoofer Broken?
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:23:57 GMT, Spam Catcher
wrote: Kalman Rubinson wrote in : In what way can the impedance of a standard audio coax or of a digital 75ohm coax be an issue here? Most RCA cables are 75 ohms - so I doubt it's the cable. But it doesn't hurt to try another one... Most RCA cables are not 75ohms but it makes no difference for analog interconnections. Kal |
Subwoofer Broken?
In article ,
Kalman Rubinson wrote: On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:32:46 GMT, Cyrus wrote: In article , "C what I mean" no wrote: "Cyrus" wrote in message ... In article .com, wrote: Hi everybody, I was hoping you could help me with a problem I have. This afternoon, I went to a local pawn shop and picked up a Philips SW-090 Powered Subwoofer for $20. From what I've researched, this is a 90-watt speaker. I brought it home, placed it on the floor (but on a piece of wood, not right on the carpet) backed up directly against a wall. I connected it to the output labeled "Subwoofer Pre Out" on the back of my receiver (an old Kenwood VR-405 Dolby Digital Receiver) with a generic 75 ohm RCA video cable. Try a regular audio RCA cable. You can try another cable just to verify that yours is ok. The coax is fine to use, but the cable may be defective for some reason. Impedance can and is an issue. In what way can the impedance of a standard audio coax or of a digital 75ohm coax be an issue here? Kal A defective RCA cable may not work properly. The point was to try another cable, regardless of what it is. -- Cyrus *coughcasaucedoprodigynetcough* |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:44 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com