|
DAB Performance of different makes?
Alan White wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:29:05 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote: Alan White wrote: On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:53:13 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote: Are you suggesting that @@@@[email protected]@@@ or Dave Plowman would call me a moron, idiot or cretin to my face? I'm afraid I can't speak for them but, if I thought it was warranted, I would. Really? So how many non-family members have you called "a cretin" or "a moron" in a non-joking manner? None, because I've never met anybody who warranted it, I try to avoid confrontation and I'm fairly easy going. ...you're the most likely to be polite face-to-face if someone does something that annoys you you're less likely to be polite on the phone if someone does something that annoys you you're even less likely to be polite in text communication if someone does something that annoys you It's just the way it is. ...for you. Thank you, that was very illuminating. Before we leave this topic, you don't have to swear or be aggressive to be rude or obnoxious. A good example of this is Richard L on alt.radio.digital, because he would never swear or be outwardly aggressive, but some of his posts can be extremely vindictive and insulting. And from memory I don't think you're immune to this kind of behaviour either. What is the difference between a snide remark and being openly rude? Not a great deal, when you look at it. -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info Please sign the petition asking the BBC to provide better audio quality on its radio stations on DAB, Freeview, satellite and cable: http://tinyurl.com/a68e4 |
DAB Performance of different makes?
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:54:28 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM"
wrote: And from memory I don't think you're immune to this kind of behaviour either. If you only think it then I wasn't. If I was you'd be quite certain. -- Alan White Twenty-eight miles NW of Glasgow, overlooking Loch Goil and Loch Long in Argyll, Scotland. Web cam and weather:- http://www.windycroft.gt-britain.co....her/kabcam.htm Some walks and treks:- http://www.windycroft.gt-britain.co.uk/walks/ |
DAB Performance of different makes?
Alan White wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:54:28 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote: And from memory I don't think you're immune to this kind of behaviour either. If you only think it then I wasn't. If I was you'd be quite certain. Don't tell me what I'm thinking. You see, you lecture me about being rude, and then you're rude. Okay, I'll change it: My view of you is that you are pretty laid back, you don't swear or become aggressive, but you DEFINITELY post snidey comments in an attempt to be clever. A frequent problem with your posts are that when you try to be snidey or clever you get your facts wrong, because you lack understanding or you lack knowledge in a certain area. Probably the main problem with you ex- or current-broadcasting engineers or technicians is that you don't like to be told about broadcasting systems by someone you perceive as a jumped up student with no practical experience. The truth is that I understand all these digital broadcasting systems far better than any one of the regulars on the uk.tech.broadcast newsgroup, and you just don't like that, do you? Deal with it. -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info Please sign the petition asking the BBC to provide better audio quality on its radio stations on DAB, Freeview, satellite and cable: http://tinyurl.com/a68e4 |
DAB Performance of different makes?
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 00:00:03 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM"
wrote: Deal with it. Right, I'll try to. -- Alan White Twenty-eight miles NW of Glasgow, overlooking Loch Goil and Loch Long in Argyll, Scotland. Web cam and weather:- http://www.windycroft.gt-britain.co....her/kabcam.htm Some walks and treks:- http://www.windycroft.gt-britain.co.uk/walks/ |
DAB Performance of different makes?
DAB sounds worse than FM wrote:
The truth is that I understand all these digital broadcasting systems far better than any one of the regulars on the uk.tech.broadcast newsgroup, and you just don't like that, do you? Deal with it. Of course you do. Why wouldn't you? You have The Three Degrees, and to top it off you've Read Loads Of Papers. And you Write for a Hi Fi Magazine. Of course you'd know more than people who can actually get a job where someone'll pay them to work in the field they supposedly know so much about. -- Nobby |
DAB Performance of different makes?
Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article , DAB sounds worse than FM wrote: [snip] There you go again, denying what you want to do. You can't admit that you were wrong originally -- a very bad trait, IMO. You're flitting between comparing reception quality and audio quality as it suits you. Get a grip. [snip] sigh Having read the above, and some of the other postings by Steve since in this thread, I think I will have to conclude that it would be a waste of effort for me to try again to explain this to him. More patronising. However, if anyone other than Steve hasn't understood clearly what I have been trying to explain, please say, and I will have another go. Yawn. My regrets are that an attempt to find info on the topics I was asking about have been submerged by Steve's reactions. Really? Hey, good luck finding DAB-related info from the DAB experts: Dave "the rave" Plowman, &&&&Jerry&&&& and Nobrain Here. Steve: you are clearly able to use whatever 'tone' you like in your postings. Absolutely. By the same token, others can decide it isn't worth talking to you if you respond as exampled above. Absolutely. Ta-ra, then. -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info Please sign the petition asking the BBC to provide better audio quality on its radio stations on DAB, Freeview, satellite and cable: http://tinyurl.com/a68e4 |
DAB Performance of different makes?
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 00:00:03 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM"
wrote: A frequent problem with your posts are that when you try to be snidey or clever you get your facts wrong, because you lack understanding or you lack knowledge in a certain area. Just a quick clarification and then I'll leave you in peace and apologies to others who may be unfortunate enough to be following this sub-thread. The only occasion on which I'm aware that I've posted inaccurate information was in my response to your assertion on 30th June (news:uk.tech.broadcast) that the BBC was inept. In that response, when describing the Sound in Sync system, I said that the coded audio digits were inserted in the back porch of the video line synchronising pulses. I later queried that myself and others confirmed that I was wrong and that the coded audio was, in fact, inserted into the sync pulses themselves. You thanked me for the information contained in that post. Again, apologies to others, and if I've posted any other misinformation I'm still waiting to hear about it. HTH -- Alan White Twenty-eight miles NW of Glasgow, overlooking Loch Goil and Loch Long in Argyll, Scotland. Web cam and weather:- http://www.windycroft.gt-britain.co....her/kabcam.htm Some walks and treks:- http://www.windycroft.gt-britain.co.uk/walks/ |
DAB Performance of different makes?
Alan White wrote:
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 00:00:03 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote: A frequent problem with your posts are that when you try to be snidey or clever you get your facts wrong, because you lack understanding or you lack knowledge in a certain area. Just a quick clarification and then I'll leave you in peace and apologies to others who may be unfortunate enough to be following this sub-thread. The only occasion on which I'm aware that I've posted inaccurate information was in my response to your assertion on 30th June (news:uk.tech.broadcast) that the BBC was inept. In that response, when describing the Sound in Sync system, I said that the coded audio digits were inserted in the back porch of the video line synchronising pulses. I later queried that myself and others confirmed that I was wrong and that the coded audio was, in fact, inserted into the sync pulses themselves. You thanked me for the information contained in that post. Again, apologies to others, and if I've posted any other misinformation I'm still waiting to hear about it. HTH No, you've made a lot of mistakes. -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info Please sign the petition asking the BBC to provide better audio quality on its radio stations on DAB, Freeview, satellite and cable: http://tinyurl.com/a68e4 |
DAB Performance of different makes?
DAB sounds worse than FM wrote:
Alan White wrote: On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 00:00:03 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote: A frequent problem with your posts are that when you try to be snidey or clever you get your facts wrong, because you lack understanding or you lack knowledge in a certain area. Just a quick clarification and then I'll leave you in peace and apologies to others who may be unfortunate enough to be following this sub-thread. The only occasion on which I'm aware that I've posted inaccurate information was in my response to your assertion on 30th June (news:uk.tech.broadcast) that the BBC was inept. In that response, when describing the Sound in Sync system, I said that the coded audio digits were inserted in the back porch of the video line synchronising pulses. I later queried that myself and others confirmed that I was wrong and that the coded audio was, in fact, inserted into the sync pulses themselves. You thanked me for the information contained in that post. Again, apologies to others, and if I've posted any other misinformation I'm still waiting to hear about it. HTH No, you've made a lot of mistakes. I'm not saying you've been dishonest, or that the mistakes were exactly life-changing, but you have, over time, made small errors. I can't remember any of them specifically, because my brain isn't a search engine like Google, but my impression is that you do make small errors. HTH. -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info Please sign the petition asking the BBC to provide better audio quality on its radio stations on DAB, Freeview, satellite and cable: http://tinyurl.com/a68e4 |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com