HomeCinemaBanter

HomeCinemaBanter (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/index.php)
-   UK digital tv (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   DAB Performance of different makes? (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/showthread.php?t=37264)

DAB sounds worse than FM October 31st 05 11:54 PM

DAB Performance of different makes?
 
Alan White wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:29:05 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM"
wrote:

Alan White wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:53:13 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM"
wrote:


Are you suggesting that
@@@@[email protected]@@@ or Dave Plowman would call me a moron, idiot or
cretin to my face?

I'm afraid I can't speak for them but, if I thought it was
warranted, I would.



Really? So how many non-family members have you called "a cretin" or
"a moron" in a non-joking manner?


None, because I've never met anybody who warranted it, I try to avoid
confrontation and I'm fairly easy going.

...you're the most likely to be polite face-to-face if someone does
something that annoys you
you're less likely to be polite on the phone if someone does
something that annoys you
you're even less likely to be polite in text communication if someone
does something that annoys you

It's just the way it is.


...for you.

Thank you, that was very illuminating.



Before we leave this topic, you don't have to swear or be aggressive to
be rude or obnoxious. A good example of this is Richard L on
alt.radio.digital, because he would never swear or be outwardly
aggressive, but some of his posts can be extremely vindictive and
insulting. And from memory I don't think you're immune to this kind of
behaviour either. What is the difference between a snide remark and
being openly rude? Not a great deal, when you look at it.



--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info

Please sign the petition asking the BBC to provide better audio quality
on its radio stations on DAB, Freeview, satellite and cable:
http://tinyurl.com/a68e4



Alan White November 1st 05 12:10 AM

DAB Performance of different makes?
 
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:54:28 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM"
wrote:

And from memory I don't think you're immune to this kind of
behaviour either.


If you only think it then I wasn't.

If I was you'd be quite certain.

--
Alan White
Twenty-eight miles NW of Glasgow, overlooking Loch Goil and Loch Long in Argyll, Scotland.
Web cam and weather:- http://www.windycroft.gt-britain.co....her/kabcam.htm
Some walks and treks:- http://www.windycroft.gt-britain.co.uk/walks/

DAB sounds worse than FM November 1st 05 01:00 AM

DAB Performance of different makes?
 
Alan White wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:54:28 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM"
wrote:

And from memory I don't think you're immune to this kind of
behaviour either.


If you only think it then I wasn't.

If I was you'd be quite certain.



Don't tell me what I'm thinking. You see, you lecture me about being
rude, and then you're rude.

Okay, I'll change it: My view of you is that you are pretty laid back,
you don't swear or become aggressive, but you DEFINITELY post snidey
comments in an attempt to be clever. A frequent problem with your posts
are that when you try to be snidey or clever you get your facts wrong,
because you lack understanding or you lack knowledge in a certain area.
Probably the main problem with you ex- or current-broadcasting engineers
or technicians is that you don't like to be told about broadcasting
systems by someone you perceive as a jumped up student with no practical
experience. The truth is that I understand all these digital
broadcasting systems far better than any one of the regulars on the
uk.tech.broadcast newsgroup, and you just don't like that, do you? Deal
with it.




--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info

Please sign the petition asking the BBC to provide better audio quality
on its radio stations on DAB, Freeview, satellite and cable:
http://tinyurl.com/a68e4



Alan White November 1st 05 09:47 AM

DAB Performance of different makes?
 
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 00:00:03 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM"
wrote:

Deal with it.


Right, I'll try to.

--
Alan White
Twenty-eight miles NW of Glasgow, overlooking Loch Goil and Loch Long in Argyll, Scotland.
Web cam and weather:- http://www.windycroft.gt-britain.co....her/kabcam.htm
Some walks and treks:- http://www.windycroft.gt-britain.co.uk/walks/

Nobody Here November 1st 05 10:16 AM

DAB Performance of different makes?
 
DAB sounds worse than FM wrote:
The truth is that I understand all these digital
broadcasting systems far better than any one of the regulars on the
uk.tech.broadcast newsgroup, and you just don't like that, do you? Deal
with it.


Of course you do. Why wouldn't you? You have The Three Degrees, and
to top it off you've Read Loads Of Papers. And you Write for a Hi Fi
Magazine. Of course you'd know more than people who can actually get
a job where someone'll pay them to work in the field they supposedly
know so much about.

--
Nobby

DAB sounds worse than FM November 1st 05 05:03 PM

DAB Performance of different makes?
 
Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article , DAB sounds worse
than FM wrote:

[snip]

There you go again, denying what you want to do. You can't admit that
you were wrong originally -- a very bad trait, IMO. You're flitting
between comparing reception quality and audio quality as it suits
you. Get a grip.



[snip]

sigh Having read the above, and some of the other postings by Steve
since in this thread, I think I will have to conclude that it would
be a waste of effort for me to try again to explain this to him.



More patronising.


However, if anyone other than Steve hasn't understood clearly what
I have been trying to explain, please say, and I will have another
go.



Yawn.


My regrets are that an attempt to find info on the topics I
was asking about have been submerged by Steve's reactions.



Really? Hey, good luck finding DAB-related info from the DAB experts:
Dave "the rave" Plowman, &&&&Jerry&&&& and Nobrain Here.


Steve: you are clearly able to use whatever 'tone' you like in your
postings.



Absolutely.


By the same token, others can decide it isn't worth talking to you
if you respond as exampled above.



Absolutely.

Ta-ra, then.


--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info

Please sign the petition asking the BBC to provide better audio quality
on its radio stations on DAB, Freeview, satellite and cable:
http://tinyurl.com/a68e4



Alan White November 1st 05 08:04 PM

DAB Performance of different makes?
 
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 00:00:03 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM"
wrote:

A frequent problem with your posts
are that when you try to be snidey or clever you get your facts wrong,
because you lack understanding or you lack knowledge in a certain area.


Just a quick clarification and then I'll leave you in peace and
apologies to others who may be unfortunate enough to be following this
sub-thread.

The only occasion on which I'm aware that I've posted inaccurate
information was in my response to your assertion on 30th June
(news:uk.tech.broadcast) that the BBC was inept. In that response,
when describing the Sound in Sync system, I said that the coded audio
digits were inserted in the back porch of the video line synchronising
pulses. I later queried that myself and others confirmed that I was
wrong and that the coded audio was, in fact, inserted into the sync
pulses themselves.

You thanked me for the information contained in that post.

Again, apologies to others, and if I've posted any other
misinformation I'm still waiting to hear about it.

HTH

--
Alan White
Twenty-eight miles NW of Glasgow, overlooking Loch Goil and Loch Long in Argyll, Scotland.
Web cam and weather:- http://www.windycroft.gt-britain.co....her/kabcam.htm
Some walks and treks:- http://www.windycroft.gt-britain.co.uk/walks/

DAB sounds worse than FM November 1st 05 09:26 PM

DAB Performance of different makes?
 
Alan White wrote:
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 00:00:03 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM"
wrote:

A frequent problem with your posts
are that when you try to be snidey or clever you get your facts
wrong, because you lack understanding or you lack knowledge in a
certain area.


Just a quick clarification and then I'll leave you in peace and
apologies to others who may be unfortunate enough to be following this
sub-thread.

The only occasion on which I'm aware that I've posted inaccurate
information was in my response to your assertion on 30th June
(news:uk.tech.broadcast) that the BBC was inept. In that response,
when describing the Sound in Sync system, I said that the coded audio
digits were inserted in the back porch of the video line synchronising
pulses. I later queried that myself and others confirmed that I was
wrong and that the coded audio was, in fact, inserted into the sync
pulses themselves.

You thanked me for the information contained in that post.

Again, apologies to others, and if I've posted any other
misinformation I'm still waiting to hear about it.

HTH



No, you've made a lot of mistakes.


--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info

Please sign the petition asking the BBC to provide better audio quality
on its radio stations on DAB, Freeview, satellite and cable:
http://tinyurl.com/a68e4



DAB sounds worse than FM November 1st 05 09:28 PM

DAB Performance of different makes?
 
DAB sounds worse than FM wrote:
Alan White wrote:
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 00:00:03 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM"
wrote:

A frequent problem with your posts
are that when you try to be snidey or clever you get your facts
wrong, because you lack understanding or you lack knowledge in a
certain area.


Just a quick clarification and then I'll leave you in peace and
apologies to others who may be unfortunate enough to be following
this sub-thread.

The only occasion on which I'm aware that I've posted inaccurate
information was in my response to your assertion on 30th June
(news:uk.tech.broadcast) that the BBC was inept. In that response,
when describing the Sound in Sync system, I said that the coded audio
digits were inserted in the back porch of the video line
synchronising pulses. I later queried that myself and others
confirmed that I was wrong and that the coded audio was, in fact,
inserted into the sync pulses themselves.

You thanked me for the information contained in that post.

Again, apologies to others, and if I've posted any other
misinformation I'm still waiting to hear about it.

HTH



No, you've made a lot of mistakes.



I'm not saying you've been dishonest, or that the mistakes were exactly
life-changing, but you have, over time, made small errors. I can't
remember any of them specifically, because my brain isn't a search
engine like Google, but my impression is that you do make small errors.

HTH.


--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info

Please sign the petition asking the BBC to provide better audio quality
on its radio stations on DAB, Freeview, satellite and cable:
http://tinyurl.com/a68e4




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com