|
I've seen the future of TV logos and it isn't good
current affairs programmes can't be sponsored
So that "A Current Affair is sponsored by Nissan" stuff is illegal? And if it is, how come Nine can get away with it. |
I've seen the future of TV logos and it isn't good
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:30:33 +0100, "DB" wrote:
Luckily the advertising in this country is regulated, so at the moment this isn't possible - at least on the mainstream channels. But then programme sponsorship never used to be allowed until the commercial operators put pressure on the regulators to change that. Can someone explain the difference between Leerdammer paying for advertisements & paying for sponsorship of 'Midsomer Murders'? -- Nigel Barker Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur |
I've seen the future of TV logos and it isn't good
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 12:12:27 GMT, Edster wrote:
"ant" wrote in message Dave wrote: Here in the USA, the main channels have loads of commercials, and commercials in the programmes themselves! I was amazed at how much advertising there was on US tv. Cable was sold in Australia partly on the idea that it had less/no ads. Well, go to the US and then think twice about shelling out for cable/pay tv! Has there been an increase in the amount of advertising on US TV? I'm sure 1 hour shows used to last for 45 minutes without ads, now they only last for 42 minutes. I watched some old 'Smother Brothers' & 'Johnny Carson' shows my pal recorded in the 60s & there was far less advertising, just 4 breaks per hour & no more than currently on ITV. -- Nigel Barker Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur |
I've seen the future of TV logos and it isn't good
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
current affairs programmes can't be sponsored So that "A Current Affair is sponsored by Nissan" stuff is illegal? And if it is, how come Nine can get away with it. This is a cross-posted thread, and I think you've just replied to a discussion of the situation in the UK. Our UK correspondents have presumably never had the pleasure of making Uncle Ray's acquaintance. |
I've seen the future of TV logos and it isn't good
current affairs programmes can't be sponsored
So that "A Current Affair is sponsored by Nissan" stuff is illegal? It would be in the UK. |
What's a "DOG"? (was: I've seen the future of TV logos and it isn't good)
Dave Farrance wrote:
"Wolfgang Wildeblood" wrote: We don't often get British newsgroups cross-posted into aus.tv so I need to ask, what are these "DOGs" that several of you have disparaged? Logos Such as Sky One, UK Gold etc. You just mean the ordinary watermark style channel logo that's on constantly? Do you have the animated logos over there yet? Yes, and not yet. Poor, deprived Pommies :-) I found a small picture of Seven's new logo I was complaining about - imagine this guy in the corner of the screen, jumping up and down, waving his arms at you: http://www1.50years.tv/current/commo...lt/1000_45.jpg |
What's a "DOG"? (was: I've seen the future of TV logos and it isn't good)
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:25:41 GMT, Dave Farrance
wrote: "Wolfgang Wildeblood" wrote: We don't often get British newsgroups cross-posted into aus.tv so I need to ask, what are these "DOGs" that several of you have disparaged? Logos Such as Sky One, UK Gold etc. You just mean the ordinary watermark style channel logo that's on constantly? Do you have the animated logos over there yet? Yes, and not yet. Stands for Digital Onscreen Graphic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_On-screen_Graphic Digitally Originated Graphics is the correct term. -- Nigel Barker Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur |
What's a "DOG"? (was: I've seen the future of TV logos and it isn't good)
"Nigel Barker" wrote in message
... On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:25:41 GMT, Dave Farrance wrote: "Wolfgang Wildeblood" wrote: We don't often get British newsgroups cross-posted into aus.tv so I need to ask, what are these "DOGs" that several of you have disparaged? Logos Such as Sky One, UK Gold etc. You just mean the ordinary watermark style channel logo that's on constantly? Do you have the animated logos over there yet? Yes, and not yet. Stands for Digital Onscreen Graphic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_On-screen_Graphic Digitally Originated Graphics is the correct term. You'd better correct the wiki then. -- Max Demian |
What's a "DOG"? (was: I've seen the future of TV logos and it isn't good)
Nigel Barker wrote:
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:25:41 GMT, Dave Farrance wrote: ... Stands for Digital Onscreen Graphic. ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_On-screen_Graphic Digitally Originated Graphics is the correct term. Oh. I've added a note to that page. Somebody else can sort out how it fits in. -- Dave Farrance |
I've seen the future of TV logos and it isn't good
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:20:17 +0100, Alan
wrote: Did it stop TUTV placing banner advertising on Ch5? The advertising may not have been broadcast as part of the program content but it was seen on screen by many people watching CH5. It didn't stop them, but C5 did get spanked for doing so, so it's unlikely they'll do it again. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com