Big Tellys look Sh*te
 

Just go back from Currys where I had a look at the big expensive
TV's once you get close to the picture is looks ugly, you can
each pixel as a big blob.
Must be a real disappoint when you have spent £3000 or so on one.

On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 20:06:01 GMT, "Albert Grennock" wrote:

| Just go back from Currys where I had a look at the big expensive
| TV's once you get close to the picture is looks ugly, you can
| each pixel as a big blob.
| Must be a real disappoint when you have spent £3000 or so on one.

But you are supposed to view them from across the room


--
Dave Fawthrop dave hyphenologist co uk
The London suicide bombers killed innocent commuters.
Animal rights terrorists and activists kill innocent patients.

Albert Grennock wrote:
Just go back from Currys where I had a look at the big expensive
TV's once you get close to the picture is looks ugly, you can
each pixel as a big blob.

If that's your normal viewing distance then I suspect a big tv is not for
you.

--
Alex

Hermes: "We can't afford that! Especially not Zoidberg!"
Zoidberg: "They took away my credit cards!"

www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk

"Dr Zoidberg" wrote in message
...
Albert Grennock wrote:
Just go back from Currys where I had a look at the big expensive
TV's once you get close to the picture is looks ugly, you can
each pixel as a big blob.

If that's your normal viewing distance then I suspect a big tv is not for
you.

--
Alex

Hermes: "We can't afford that! Especially not Zoidberg!"
Zoidberg: "They took away my credit cards!"

www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk



I don't think Mr Grennock is to keen on new technology (when it comes to TVs
at least). :-)

See our little discussion on Widescreen vs 4:3 in the 'Scart plugs are a
pane' thread.

Cheers,

Chris.

"Dr Zoidberg" wrote in message
...
Albert Grennock wrote:
Just go back from Currys where I had a look at the big expensive
TV's once you get close to the picture is looks ugly, you can
each pixel as a big blob.

If that's your normal viewing distance then I suspect a big tv is not for
you.

--
Alex

Hermes: "We can't afford that! Especially not Zoidberg!"
Zoidberg: "They took away my credit cards!"

www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk


Personally, I'd recommend that a lobotomy would be for Albert Grennock.
Or maybe just some common sense?

"Chris M" wrote in message
eenews.net...
"Dr Zoidberg" wrote in message
...
Albert Grennock wrote:
Just go back from Currys where I had a look at the big expensive
TV's once you get close to the picture is looks ugly, you can
each pixel as a big blob.

If that's your normal viewing distance then I suspect a big tv is not
for
you.

--
Alex

Hermes: "We can't afford that! Especially not Zoidberg!"
Zoidberg: "They took away my credit cards!"

www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk



I don't think Mr Grennock is to keen on new technology (when it comes to
TVs
at least). :-)


Hardly new technology though is it.
Thats like saying early computers were better because the transistors were
bigger :O)
Lets all go back to computers with valves!!


See our little discussion on Widescreen vs 4:3 in the 'Scart plugs are a
pane' thread.

Cheers,

Chris.

"Edward Holt" wrote in message
...
"Dr Zoidberg" wrote in message
...
Albert Grennock wrote:
Just go back from Currys where I had a look at the big expensive
TV's once you get close to the picture is looks ugly, you can
each pixel as a big blob.

If that's your normal viewing distance then I suspect a big tv is not
for
you.

--
Alex

Hermes: "We can't afford that! Especially not Zoidberg!"
Zoidberg: "They took away my credit cards!"

www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk


Personally, I'd recommend that a lobotomy would be for Albert Grennock.
Or maybe just some common sense?

Are you trying to say that then I would be able to think and commumicte on
your
level? Matbe so but I think I will give it a miss all the same.

"Albert Grennock" wrote in message
...
Just go back from Currys where I had a look at the big expensive
TV's once you get close to the picture is looks ugly, you can
each pixel as a big blob.
Must be a real disappoint when you have spent £3000 or so on one.


I suppose they will look a lot better when displaying HDTV.
Regards Mike.

In article , =20
says...
Just go back from Currys where I had a look at the big expensive
TV's once you get close to the picture is looks ugly, you can
each pixel as a big blob.
Must be a real disappoint when you have spent =A33000 or so on one.
=20
=20
=20
Worse with digital T.V. you are better off with a standard CRT T.V.
I think these people who think the picture is so great on their big T.Vs=20
should have their eyes tested. A friend of mine got his family a plasma,=20
he only had it for a week and got fed up with the quality and returned=20
it. The quality was crap, it was ok with DVD, but not with Sky.

In article ,
says...


Hardly new technology though is it.
Thats like saying early computers were better because the transistors were
bigger :O)
Lets all go back to computers with valves!!


at least you would not need central heating. the only problem is, you
would need a second mortgage to pay for the electricity bills.