HomeCinemaBanter

HomeCinemaBanter (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/index.php)
-   High definition TV (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Why distribute movies on film at all? (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/showthread.php?t=34193)

forge July 4th 05 01:21 PM

In article ws.net,
"Dave C." wrote:

This setup
will work just fine for all but the largest of living rooms or family rooms.


And a small movie theater is bigger than any fifteen or twenty living
rooms put together.

Brad Filippone July 4th 05 01:41 PM

forge ) wrote:
: In article [email protected], wrote:

: Well for what it is worth, George Lucas wants digital projection, so I doubt
: it really matters what we think. Also for what it's worth, theatres use
: xenon projection lamps, they no longer use carbon arc.(Unless the switched
: back after I got outof the business fifteen years ago.

: Everyone on Earth can now tell George Lucas to go scratch his ass. He
: will never release another film that anyone will pay money to watch.

Just give him time. He'll eventually produce episodes 7-9 as he
originally planned to do.

Brad

LA_industry July 5th 05 05:41 AM

On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 07:17:07 -0400, forge
wrote:

In article [email protected], wrote:

Well for what it is worth, George Lucas wants digital projection, so I doubt
it really matters what we think. Also for what it's worth, theatres use
xenon projection lamps, they no longer use carbon arc.(Unless the switched
back after I got outof the business fifteen years ago.


Everyone on Earth can now tell George Lucas to go scratch his ass. He
will never release another film that anyone will pay money to watch.



Georgie don't have to make any movies, it's JUST a hobby for him.

He got out of movies and into support: special effects and sound.
Probably 2 out of 3 movies you watch use his services.

PS what's your hobby ?



Larry Caldwell July 6th 05 04:43 AM

In article ,
lid (Howard Christeller) says...

Stop right there. This is incredibly wrong. Analog has limited
resolution, just like digital. EVERYTHING physical has limited
resolution. Infinite resolution is equivalent to perpetual motion.

Both film and video use discrete samples over time, with rather poor
sample rates at that.


Film makers have been messing with film formats for decades. Besides
the triple camera/projector Cinerama experiment, there is 70mm wide
screen (still seen at super cinemas), anamorphic wide screen, often used
to strike 70mm prints, or just projected through an anamorphic lens from
a 35mm print, super 35, and of course, the Super 70 IMAX format, that
turns 70mm on its side and shoots a frame 7 cm high and 15 sprocket pins
wide, while moving the sound track off of the film onto a synchronized
35mm tape.

I imagine we have seen the last of the film innovations, but digital
innovations are just getting started. Digital processing will
eventually offer a viewing experience not available in theaters. When
that happens, the multiplexes will be hard put to survive.

--
http://home.teleport.com/~larryc

Dave Oldridge July 7th 05 06:06 AM

Larry Caldwell wrote in
k.net:

In article ,
lid (Howard Christeller) says...

Stop right there. This is incredibly wrong. Analog has limited
resolution, just like digital. EVERYTHING physical has limited
resolution. Infinite resolution is equivalent to perpetual motion.

Both film and video use discrete samples over time, with rather poor
sample rates at that.


Film makers have been messing with film formats for decades. Besides
the triple camera/projector Cinerama experiment, there is 70mm wide
screen (still seen at super cinemas), anamorphic wide screen, often

used
to strike 70mm prints, or just projected through an anamorphic lens

from
a 35mm print, super 35, and of course, the Super 70 IMAX format, that
turns 70mm on its side and shoots a frame 7 cm high and 15 sprocket

pins
wide, while moving the sound track off of the film onto a synchronized
35mm tape.

I imagine we have seen the last of the film innovations, but digital
innovations are just getting started. Digital processing will
eventually offer a viewing experience not available in theaters. When
that happens, the multiplexes will be hard put to survive.


Oh, I think they'll do just fine. By putting in large digital screens.


--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667

A false witness is worse than no witness at all.
God is an evolutionist.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com