widescreen channels?
 

anyone know if any of the sky channels will be switiching to widescreen?
****ing me off as there's like a handful that are really! to many showing
films in pan and scan! would have thought sci fi would have gone widescreen
at least.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Owner of a black
1993 MR2 Turbo (import car)

Previous beast
1985 MR2 MK1 (UK car)

Vamp wrote:
anyone know if any of the sky channels will be switiching to
widescreen? ****ing me off as there's like a handful that are really!
to many showing films in pan and scan! would have thought sci fi
would have gone widescreen at least.

Try English next time.

--
ThePunisher
Latitude: 54.67N
Longitude: 5.96W

"ThePunisher" wrote in message
...
Vamp wrote:
anyone know if any of the sky channels will be switiching to
widescreen? ****ing me off as there's like a handful that are really!
to many showing films in pan and scan! would have thought sci fi
would have gone widescreen at least.

Try English next time.

--
ThePunisher
Latitude: 54.67N
Longitude: 5.96W



try be ****ing helpful, i'm sorry my post wasn't up to degree english
standards. ****wit!

Vamp wrote on Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:47:34 +0100:

try be ****ing helpful, i'm sorry my post wasn't up to degree english
standards. ****wit!

Sadly for you, it's not even up to primary school English standards.

Also, insulting the people you wish to help you does not really encourage
people "be helpful", as you put it.

--
David Taylor

"David Taylor" wrote in message
...
Vamp wrote on Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:47:34 +0100:

try be ****ing helpful, i'm sorry my post wasn't up to degree english
standards. ****wit!

Sadly for you, it's not even up to primary school English standards.

Also, insulting the people you wish to help you does not really encourage
people "be helpful", as you put it.

--
David Taylor

yeah well it's the only replying and i doubt he posts anything useful to
anyone else's threads. might correct there spelling for them maybe.

Vamp wrote:
"David Taylor" wrote in message
...
Vamp wrote on Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:47:34 +0100:

try be ****ing helpful, i'm sorry my post wasn't up to degree
english standards. ****wit!

Sadly for you, it's not even up to primary school English standards.

Also, insulting the people you wish to help you does not really
encourage people "be helpful", as you put it.

--
David Taylor

yeah well it's the only replying and i doubt he posts anything useful
to anyone else's threads. might correct there spelling for them maybe.

Can we stop picking on people just because they don't spell or punctuate
properly? It's not that terrible a sin after all. Some people just can't
do it, so shall we exclude them from saying anything? I don't think so!
The widescreen question is a valid one - there really ought to be more.

"Ian" wrote in message
...


Vamp wrote:
"David Taylor" wrote in message
...
Vamp wrote on Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:47:34 +0100:

try be ****ing helpful, i'm sorry my post wasn't up to degree
english standards. ****wit!

Sadly for you, it's not even up to primary school English standards.

Also, insulting the people you wish to help you does not really
encourage people "be helpful", as you put it.

--
David Taylor

yeah well it's the only replying and i doubt he posts anything useful
to anyone else's threads. might correct there spelling for them maybe.

Can we stop picking on people just because they don't spell or punctuate
properly? It's not that terrible a sin after all. Some people just can't
do it, so shall we exclude them from saying anything? I don't think so!
The widescreen question is a valid one - there really ought to be more.



thank you! i didn't mean to be so rude but IMO he is, i could have learning
difficulties before he know's! i don't i just can't be bothered to type at a
oxford degree level sorry.

just fed up with people on newsgroups and forums going on about bad
spelling! maybe i should type in txt speak next time :)

Vamp wrote:
"Ian" wrote in message
...


Vamp wrote:
"David Taylor" wrote in message
...
Vamp wrote on Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:47:34 +0100:

try be ****ing helpful, i'm sorry my post wasn't up to degree
english standards. ****wit!

Sadly for you, it's not even up to primary school English
standards. Also, insulting the people you wish to help you does not
really
encourage people "be helpful", as you put it.

--
David Taylor

yeah well it's the only replying and i doubt he posts anything
useful to anyone else's threads. might correct there spelling for
them maybe.

Can we stop picking on people just because they don't spell or
punctuate properly? It's not that terrible a sin after all. Some
people just can't do it, so shall we exclude them from saying
anything? I don't think so! The widescreen question is a valid one
- there really ought to be more.

thank you! i didn't mean to be so rude but IMO he is, i could have
learning difficulties before he know's! i don't i just can't be
bothered to type at a oxford degree level sorry.

just fed up with people on newsgroups and forums going on about bad
spelling! maybe i should type in txt speak next time :)

It's nothing to do with spelling, lets take a look at your post again,

anyone know if any of the sky channels will be switiching to widescreen?

Which ones? they're are loads already doing this.

****ing me off as there's like a handful that are really!

really what? are you drunk?

to many showing films in pan and scan!

again, what ones, people aren't mind readers.

would have thought sci fi would have gone widescreen at least.

that channel is run by idiots, anyone who gets rid of MST3K are fools.

--
ThePunisher
Latitude: 54.67N
Longitude: 5.96W

ThePunisher wrote:
Vamp wrote:
"Ian" wrote in message
...


Vamp wrote:
"David Taylor" wrote in message
...
Vamp wrote on Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:47:34 +0100:

try be ****ing helpful, i'm sorry my post wasn't up to degree
english standards. ****wit!

Sadly for you, it's not even up to primary school English
standards. Also, insulting the people you wish to help you does
not really
encourage people "be helpful", as you put it.

--
David Taylor

yeah well it's the only replying and i doubt he posts anything
useful to anyone else's threads. might correct there spelling for
them maybe.

Can we stop picking on people just because they don't spell or
punctuate properly? It's not that terrible a sin after all. Some
people just can't do it, so shall we exclude them from saying
anything? I don't think so! The widescreen question is a valid one
- there really ought to be more.

thank you! i didn't mean to be so rude but IMO he is, i could have
learning difficulties before he know's! i don't i just can't be
bothered to type at a oxford degree level sorry.

just fed up with people on newsgroups and forums going on about bad
spelling! maybe i should type in txt speak next time :)

It's nothing to do with spelling, lets take a look at your post again,

anyone know if any of the sky channels will be switiching to
widescreen?

Which ones? they're are loads already doing this.

****ing me off as there's like a handful that are really!

really what? are you drunk?

to many showing films in pan and scan!

again, what ones, people aren't mind readers.

would have thought sci fi would have gone widescreen at least.

that channel is run by idiots, anyone who gets rid of MST3K are fools.

Are you like this with everyone? :(

Ian wrote:

Are you like this with everyone? :(

Comes of being the Punisher. Can't help it, see.

Regards

Mark