|
John Porcella wrote:
"it have been said"!! ITV have 'has' not 'have' won the new slot on Freeview along with channel 4. I can see ITV4 is going to be as bad as ITV 1,2 and 3 and Ch4 is thinking about a games channel. What a waste, these two slots could have been used for something better. Even expanding ABC1 would have been a better bet. Just typical, money talks. So long as it talks accurately, I do not mind. For goodness sake, stop picking people up on their grammar or spelling, |
Matti Lamprhey wrote:
No it bloody isn't -- it carries welcome repeats of good programmes, like Jeeves & Wooster, Foyle's War, and I could go on. It's ITV2 which is the Pure ****e Channel. This is the problem, repeats, all repeats and ITV4 will be the same. |
"Nick" wrote in message ... "leon" wrote in message ... Picky little sh*t aren't you, always looking out for grammar errors, ever thought of getting a life, or actually giving a sensible response to the OP's message. Shouldn't that be 'grammatical errors' ...? Put that in to bring out more anal retentives, like you ! ? |
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 13:51:37 GMT, Kev wrote:
| Channel 4 now have two slots (possibly 3 if they squeeze four slots onto | there half of multiplex 2 like ITV have done) | | From Digital Spy :- | | Option 1: More4 | One of the two slots will definitely be used for More 4, a new factual | station launching in October. The channel, which has a budget of £30 | million, will target the over-35s with a programme lineup including | original documentaries, drama "events" and a daily news bulletin. I'll say my digital prayers for that one. -- Dave F |
"diggler 943" wrote in message ... ITV3 is dire [...] No it bloody isn't -- it carries welcome repeats of good programmes, like Jeeves & Wooster, Foyle's War, and I could go on. It's ITV2 which is the Pure ****e Channel. Matti I agree absolutely with the above but it depends on your age and ITV3 is not intended for the the little pop twinkies but the grey and wealthy oldies. Well, I'm youngish and well-to-do and I enjoy it too. Beats the hell out of ITV1 and ITV2. |
Ad wrote:
This is the problem, repeats, all repeats and ITV4 will be the same. I think you may be missing the whole point of this multi channel broadcasting thing ;-) (there is not enough new content to fill the existing analogue channels, so what did you expect to get on all the extras, the potters wheel again?) -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
Dave Fawthrop said the following on 2005-03-26 14:41:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 13:51:37 GMT, Kev wrote: | Channel 4 now have two slots (possibly 3 if they squeeze four slots onto | there half of multiplex 2 like ITV have done) | | From Digital Spy :- | | Option 1: More4 | One of the two slots will definitely be used for More 4, a new factual | station launching in October. The channel, which has a budget of £30 | million, will target the over-35s with a programme lineup including | original documentaries, drama "events" and a daily news bulletin. I'll say my digital prayers for that one. We're getting that one in October for certain.... Selflishly i hope it goes onto Multiplex C then i stand a good chance of getting it at my new place (in group for Nottingham, just out of group for Waltham, unlike Multiplex 2 which is right at the wrong end of the band in both cases!) Kev |
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:25:31 +0000, Ad
wrote: Here we go again, it have been said that ITV have won the new slot on Freeview along with channel 4. I can see ITV4 is going to be as bad as ITV 1,2 and 3 and Ch4 is thinking about a games channel. What a waste, these two slots could have been used for something better. Even expanding ABC1 would have been a better bet. Just typical, money talks. I think I would prefer the test card. Scott |
"Kev" wrote in message
... Multiplex D : Movie Channel, with games channel during downtime Why would a movie channel have a downtime? Aren't there enough movies around? -- Max Demian |
"Nick" wrote in message ... "leon" wrote in message ... Picky little sh*t aren't you, always looking out for grammar errors, ever thought of getting a life, or actually giving a sensible response to the OP's message. Why do you think that my response was not sensible? Shouldn't that be 'grammatical errors' ...? "Should that not be 'grammatical errors'?" is better. -- MESSAGE ENDS. John Porcella |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com