In article , Ad C
writes
Kennedy McEwen wrote:
In article , Ad C
writes


one of the reasons I do not go out


Followed by:

I got a good social life.
Stop lying to yourself and get a life - third time!

ah, so I am not getting ready to go and see some people then?
Just because I do not go to pubs, do not mean I do not have a social life.

Who mentioned pubs - *you* said you didn't go out. Only you seem to
have associated going out with going to pubs.
--
Kennedy
Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed;
A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's ****ed.
Python Philosophers (replace 'nospam' with 'kennedym' when replying)

In article , Ad C wrote:
It is not nature, for a load of jumped up posh twits to run around like
chidren chasing after a fox, for the fun of it.

Clearly, the issue for you is quite simply that other people, who you
generally believe to be above your personal social level, obtain some
enjoyment from it. It has nothing to do with animal rights or the
control of pests in a countryside environment, which subsequent posts
from you have demonstrated you do not understand in the slightest.

It got a lot to do with animal rights.

It's got nothing to do with animal rights, or whether the animals are pests or
useful for food or whatever. Does it make sense to talk of an animal having
"rights" anywway?

It's to do with the morality of killing things for fun. Have we forgotten what
morality means nowadays?

Rod.

"Roderick Stewart" wrote
| It's to do with the morality of killing things for fun. Have we
| forgotten what morality means nowadays?

Have we forgotten what fun means nowadays?

Owain

Kennedy McEwen wrote:

Followed by:

I got a good social life.

Stop lying to yourself and get a life - third time!


ah, so I am not getting ready to go and see some people then?
Just because I do not go to pubs, do not mean I do not have a social
life.

Who mentioned pubs - *you* said you didn't go out. Only you seem to
have associated going out with going to pubs.

I do not go into pubs or clubs, but I do go and see people, so I have
social life.

Roderick Stewart wrote:



It's got nothing to do with animal rights, or whether the animals are pests or
useful for food or whatever. Does it make sense to talk of an animal having
"rights" anywway?


Why not? After all, we are only animals, the only difference is we are
suppose to be more intelligent, but looking the way the world is going,
I do not think we are.


It's to do with the morality of killing things for fun. Have we forgotten what
morality means nowadays?

I think a lot of people have.

Owain wrote:
"Roderick Stewart" wrote
| It's to do with the morality of killing things for fun. Have we
| forgotten what morality means nowadays?

Have we forgotten what fun means nowadays?

If you think killing things is fun, then well, what I can I say.