|
soup popped their head over the parapet saw what was going on and said
infobegger popped their head over the parapet saw what was going on and said nog wrote in message ... On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 23:53:39 -0500, operator jay wrote: "Jim Watt" wrote in message ... On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 10:56:00 GMT, "-V-TECH-" wrote: Looking for a first class satellite reciever and that little bit extra go here http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...tem=5724309455 many thanks Do they auction spell checkers as well as satelitte Recievers? -- Jim Watt http://www.gibnet.com Thinking one might help with words like satelitte, are you? :-) And some fell upon stony ground, ... :^) ...No one likes a smart arse. "I" before "E" except after "C". :o) Remember there was a rhyme we had to learn at school that had all the exeptions, they included sheik and Sheila. -- yours S Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione |
In uk.tech.digital-tv Walt Davidson wrote:[i]
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 00:00:03 +0100 (BST), (Brian {Hamilton Kelly}) wrote: Incidentally, *none* of those "ei" and "ie" digraphs written by Walt have an "ee" sound (to be more precise, in ASCII IPA). Not even 'weird'? It's sort of questionable whether the 'ei' in weird is pronounced 'ee', it's not quite the same sound as the 'ei' in receive for example. And then there's 'Leigh', a town in Lancashire where Santa often goes on his sleigh. There are quite a few proper names which break the i before e except after c when pronounced 'ee' rule:- Keith Sheila Lots of places called Leigh (and longer names with Leigh in them) Silly language .... ;-) What's silly about it? It's just the way it is, if you don't like it try another one. :-) -- Chris Green |
wrote in message ...[i]
In uk.tech.digital-tv Walt Davidson wrote: On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 00:00:03 +0100 (BST), (Brian {Hamilton Kelly}) wrote: Incidentally, *none* of those "ei" and "ie" digraphs written by Walt have an "ee" sound (to be more precise, in ASCII IPA). Not even 'weird'? It's sort of questionable whether the 'ei' in weird is pronounced 'ee', it's not quite the same sound as the 'ei' in receive for example. Weird is pronounced wee-erd, i.e. two sounds. And then there's 'Leigh', a town in Lancashire where Santa often goes on his sleigh. Surely Santa visits *every* town in Christendom. There are quite a few proper names which break the i before e except after c when pronounced 'ee' rule:- Keith Sheila Lots of places called Leigh (and longer names with Leigh in them) It also doesn't explain why Keighley sounds as if it has a 'th' in it. Silly language .... ;-) What's silly about it? It's just the way it is, if you don't like it try another one. :-) It helps to confuse foreigners who don't speak it (like Americans). -- Max Demian |
In uk.tech.digital-tv Walt Davidson wrote:
It is exactly the same sound ... if you happen to come from a sensible part of the UK! (Similarly, 'ant' and 'aunt' are pronounced identically but "which" and "witch" are not!) Oh no they aren't ('aunt'?) :-) -- Chris Green |
In uk.tech.digital-tv Walt Davidson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:20:18 +0100 (BST), (Brian {Hamilton Kelly}) wrote: Not even 'weird'? Nope; that's a diphthong: [[email protected]]. Not according to my dictionary. The phonetic pronunciation of "weird" is shown as "werd" with a bar above the 'e'. The phonetic pronunciation of "receive" is shown as "resev" with bars above each 'e'. Well I think your dictionary has an odd idea of the way to pronounce receive then, I certainly don't pronounce both syllables the same and trying to do so makes the word sound very odd. -- Chris Green |
In uk.tech.digital-tv Walt Davidson wrote:
On 22 Oct 2004 08:25:23 GMT, wrote: In uk.tech.digital-tv Walt Davidson wrote: Not according to my dictionary. The phonetic pronunciation of "weird" is shown as "werd" with a bar above the 'e'. The phonetic pronunciation of "receive" is shown as "resev" with bars above each 'e'. Well I think your dictionary has an odd idea of the way to pronounce receive then, I certainly don't pronounce both syllables the same and trying to do so makes the word sound very odd. I cannot think of any other correct way to pronounce the word "receive". Perhaps you come from Essex? When actually speaking (as opposed to saying the word in isolation) there is no way any normal person will make the first vowel sound anywhere near as long as the second. In reality it will become more like the short i in 'ridge'. If one said 'r-ee-c-ee-ve' all the time it would sound very strange to my mind (not to mention my ears!). I'm desperately trying to find a dictionary but can only find a Webster at the moment. My big Collins French/English shows the first vowel short and the second one long. -- Chris Green |
In uk.tech.digital-tv wrote:
In uk.tech.digital-tv Walt Davidson wrote: On 22 Oct 2004 08:25:23 GMT, wrote: In uk.tech.digital-tv Walt Davidson wrote: Not according to my dictionary. The phonetic pronunciation of "weird" is shown as "werd" with a bar above the 'e'. The phonetic pronunciation of "receive" is shown as "resev" with bars above each 'e'. Well I think your dictionary has an odd idea of the way to pronounce receive then, I certainly don't pronounce both syllables the same and trying to do so makes the word sound very odd. I cannot think of any other correct way to pronounce the word "receive". Perhaps you come from Essex? [snip my own waffling] I'm desperately trying to find a dictionary but can only find a Webster at the moment. My big Collins French/English shows the first vowel short and the second one long. I've now found both a Collins and a Chambers dictionary, both show the two syllables of receive as different:- Chambers:- ri-sev (the e has a line over it) according to the pronunciation guide, i as in 'pin', e (with a line over it) as in 'lean'. Collins:- ri'si:v (that's not actually a colon, but looks a bit like it) according to the pronunciation guide, i as in 'build', i: as in 'see'. What dictionary were you looking in? -- Chris Green |
In uk.tech.digital-tv Walt Davidson wrote:
On 22 Oct 2004 20:53:50 GMT, wrote: What dictionary were you looking in? Chambers Twentieth Century Dictionary. Of course, we are now in the Twenty-first Century, so Estuary English has become accepted as the norm. :-( So how is that my Chambers disagrees with your Chambers? -- Chris Green |
On Friday, in article
"Walt Davidson" wrote: On 22 Oct 2004 08:25:23 GMT, wrote: In uk.tech.digital-tv Walt Davidson wrote: Not according to my dictionary. The phonetic pronunciation of "weird" is shown as "werd" with a bar above the 'e'. The phonetic pronunciation of "receive" is shown as "resev" with bars above each 'e'. Well I think your dictionary has an odd idea of the way to pronounce receive then, I certainly don't pronounce both syllables the same and trying to do so makes the word sound very odd. I cannot think of any other correct way to pronounce the word "receive". Perhaps you come from Essex? Chambers' shows "risev", with a bar above the 'e'. This would be close to Oxford Pronunciation. It's certainly nothing like hearing ree-seev, as you suggest. Moreover, nowadays I think most people tend to pronounce the first syllable with a schwa. -- Brian {Hamilton Kelly} "I don't use Linux. I prefer to use an OS supported by a large multi- national vendor, with a good office suite, excellent network/internet software and decent hardware support." |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com