|
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:14:17 -0000, "Mat Overton"
wrote: If they do update the software, will they change the menu and remove the Ondigital logo???? AFAIK the old OnDodgy boxes cannot have software updates... -- Moldy The only difference between crap and art, is that art has brass name plates below it |
Moldy wrote:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:14:17 -0000, "Mat Overton" wrote: If they do update the software, will they change the menu and remove the Ondigital logo???? AFAIK the old OnDodgy boxes cannot have software updates... They could, if someone would broadcast them. There's nothing intrisically non-updatable in old ONd boxes. (IME of Nokia and Philips, anyway) -- Tony |
Moldy wrote:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:14:17 -0000, "Mat Overton" wrote: If they do update the software, will they change the menu and remove the Ondigital logo???? AFAIK the old OnDodgy boxes cannot have software updates... They could, if someone would broadcast them. There's nothing intrisically non-updatable in old ONd boxes. (IME of Nokia and Philips, anyway) -- Tony |
"Steve" wrote in message m... ... and is in talks to join the planned pay-TV service on Freeview: http://media.guardian.co.uk/broadcas...140103,00.html Yep, I'd probably pay but where will the channels go? I can't see it ever happening unless loads of channels get junked or an extra couple of mux's get added to the current 6. -- Steve - http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/ DAB sounds worse than Freeview, digital satellite, cable, broadband internet and FM |
"Steve" wrote in message m... ... and is in talks to join the planned pay-TV service on Freeview: http://media.guardian.co.uk/broadcas...140103,00.html Yep, I'd probably pay but where will the channels go? I can't see it ever happening unless loads of channels get junked or an extra couple of mux's get added to the current 6. -- Steve - http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/ DAB sounds worse than Freeview, digital satellite, cable, broadband internet and FM |
Steve wrote:
... and is in talks to join the planned pay-TV service on Freeview: http://media.guardian.co.uk/broadcas...140103,00.html Its here.... www.topuptv.com |
Steve wrote:
... and is in talks to join the planned pay-TV service on Freeview: http://media.guardian.co.uk/broadcas...140103,00.html Its here.... www.topuptv.com |
In article , steve41
@totalise.co.uk says... ... and is in talks to join the planned pay-TV service on Freeview: http://media.guardian.co.uk/broadcas...140103,00.html ROTFLMAO!!!!!!! |
In article , steve41
@totalise.co.uk says... ... and is in talks to join the planned pay-TV service on Freeview: http://media.guardian.co.uk/broadcas...140103,00.html ROTFLMAO!!!!!!! |
"simonbray" wrote in message ...
... and is in talks to join the planned pay-TV service on Freeview: http://media.guardian.co.uk/broadcas...140103,00.html Suely, if they decide to go the pay-tv route, then aren't Freeview breaking their licence as the consortium was granted a licence to the frequencies because they were setting up a FREE service? If people are unhappy with the prospect of pay-tv services, they should lobby the freeview consortium for mis-selling the service "Freeview" do not provide all the DTT channels in the UK (whatever the misleading BBC advertising campaign says). They do provide a lot of the channels, but two of the multiplexes are operated by other companies. So long as the content on the freeview multiplexes remains free, they are not breaking the conditions of their licence. As far as I know, the owners of the other two multiplexes (muxes "2" and "A") are not obliged to provide a free service (as they do at the moment - supplying us with free crap like QVC and bid-upTV). But ITV1, C4 and Five are currently broadcast free on these muxes and I don't think they'll be allowed to go encrypted. Ric. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com