| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
|
John Carrier wrote:
.. For the golden ears who bi-wire 99.9% silver speaker wire and calibrate their video every time they screen a new DVD, the solution lies elsewhere. R / John Yep. it's the p sy chiatrist. Clay |
"UnFriendly Fire" wrote in message
. .. "B. Earp" wrote in message ... Tripe. In most instances, a digital meter "blows" an analog meter away in both response time and accuracy.... but not in this particular instance - (Another wanna-be tech) Look sparky, How in the WORLD does this particular instance change how the digital meter in accuracy and response time change and suddenly become inferior to an analog meter? because in this instance the response time of the digital meter is a lot lower than the analog's. This was already said elsewhere in this thread, and also the last time we went through all this and more in an older thread. We were all talking about RS meters before you spun things by brining up the ones that you fondle for money. the RS digital one is a pain compared to the RS analog one. That, dumbass, is a different issue all together and subject to the "reading" skills of the user. RTFB (read the ****ing beek) no, it's the same issue, because slow response is a pain. Have you even used the ones we're talking about? I didn't think so. It's all been discussed here before - the details are somewhere in Google Groups. Um, that's nice, but I don't need to google something I already KNOW. In that case do a search on how to control yourself. Hostile over a sound meter discussion, what's the world coming to... |
"B. Earp" wrote in message ... "UnFriendly Fire" wrote in message . .. "B. Earp" wrote in message ... Tripe. In most instances, a digital meter "blows" an analog meter away in both response time and accuracy.... but not in this particular instance - (Another wanna-be tech) Look sparky, How in the WORLD does this particular instance change how the digital meter in accuracy and response time change and suddenly become inferior to an analog meter? because in this instance the response time of the digital meter is a lot lower than the analog's. Response time? Because you see the needle "actually" moving, you call that response with accuracy? Welcome to the world of analog vs digital. Just because you rattle the bag does not mean anything is worth a crap inside. This was already said elsewhere in this thread, and also the last time we went through all this and more in an older thread. Great, blind leading the blind obviously. We were all talking about RS meters before you spun things by brining up the ones that you fondle for money. ROFL. Another fallacy of logic. Google that and get back to me! the RS digital one is a pain compared to the RS analog one. That, dumbass, is a different issue all together and subject to the "reading" skills of the user. RTFB (read the ****ing beek) no, it's the same issue, because slow response is a pain. Have you even used the ones we're talking about? I didn't think so. Stop thinking, there in lies your problem. Not only have I used them, calibrated them....I own both models. I quite possibly have been using the analog model before you were old enough to fondle yourself! As for slow response is a pain.....is it a pain to "wait" for the needle to move and flutter at mid scale? Idiot! It's all been discussed here before - the details are somewhere in Google Groups. Um, that's nice, but I don't need to google something I already KNOW. In that case do a search on how to control yourself. Hostile over a sound meter discussion, what's the world coming to... Hostile? Who is hostie? I'm pointing out the fact that tripe little wanna-be's like you offer up advise and cut down others that actually KNOW what they're talking about. What ground breaking information did your dribble offer up? Nada, zilch, nutin. All you did was come at me. So, crawl back under your bridge.......you don't own Usenet. |
much discussion snipped
In that case do a search on how to control yourself. Hostile over a sound meter discussion, what's the world coming to... Hostile? Who is hostie? I'm pointing out the fact that tripe little wanna-be's like you snip Now *that* made me laugh! Harvey |
Eclipsme wrote:
much discussion snipped In that case do a search on how to control yourself. Hostile over a sound meter discussion, what's the world coming to... Hostile? Who is hostie? I'm pointing out the fact that tripe little wanna-be's like you snip Now *that* made me laugh! Harvey Made me laugh too. It was a rather funny thread to read. And then the "What, me hostile?" ending was perfect. Mike |
hiiii UnFriendly...
Response time? Because you see the needle "actually" moving, you call that response with accuracy? Welcome to the world of analog vs digital. Just because you rattle the bag does not mean anything is worth a crap inside. yea whatever, as long as we're spinning things again and focusing out of the specific and going to the general, why don't we throw in a good old vinyl vs CD debate just for good measure (I said response time, not accuracy, but remember the difference between accuracy and precision? and remember when you said it's all about getting all channels equal, something you were actually correct on...well, Mr. Metrology Whiz, that all relies on precision, not accuracy) ROFL. You actually laugh? Another fallacy of logic. Google that and get back to me! yet again, it's Google Groups, not Google. http://www.google.com/advanced_group_search?hl=en I trust that you can figure out the rest. My oh so hostile response that set you off is there too. Stop thinking, there in lies your problem. Not only have I used them, calibrated them....I own both models. I quite possibly have been using the analog model before you were old enough to fondle yourself! As for slow response is a pain.....is it a pain to "wait" for the needle to move and flutter at mid scale? Idiot! Your expertise in the field of set screw rotation until a display tells you it's time to stop is so impressive, I don't blame you for mentioning a second time that you're adept at calibrating meters. Now getting back to RS meters and calibration of your head, I mean home theater, I guess you never noticed that as you make speaker level adjustments, the analog meter changes cooperatively at the same rate, whereas the digital one lags, you realize you've overshot, you have to adjust again, wait again for the reading to update because it's blank half the time, the bar graph at the bottom another distraction... Anyway, now we're back to personal preference, which is really where this started, so this is going in circles. You say digital, I say analog. Knock yourself out. I'm getting bored. Hostile? Who is hostie? I'm pointing out the fact that tripe little wanna-be's like you Just as I was questioning why I bother with this, a classic response like that made it all worthwhile. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:26 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com