|
Folletwatch
Did anyone else spot our very own James Follet in glorious
technicolour on Watchdog yesterday? He was being described as "malicious" by a dubious publishing agent who had taken his fee and then had him make numerous pointless re-writes to a script that apparently had no real potential buyer. I found this part to be unusual. Why bother stringing someone along when you've got the fee anyway? From the evidence given it didn't seem possible to say whether the agent was really crooked (Watchdog rarely provides conclusive evidence and often relies on the "I'm bigger than you" approach to naming and shaming) but I was a little surprised that someone who has been around as long as James should be taken in by one of these "pay a service fee to get on my books" agents, be they of the literary or modelling type. I suppose the only good thing about it was that the sum lost was small. The wasted effort must have been much more galling. -- Digibox problem? : A reboot solves 90% of these. The Sky Digital FAQ: http://tinyurl.com/tez5 How to get UK TV overseas: http://tinyurl.com/6p73 Fed up with logos / red buttons? : http://logofreetv.org/ BBC gone? : http://www.astra2d.co.uk/ ---- Only the truth as I see it. No monies return'd. ;-) |
Jomtien wrote:
The wasted effort must have been much more galling. At least it kept him off the streets. Regards Mark |
JF wrote:
I never parted with a penny. I've already got an excellent agent I've been with over thirty years. In 2000 Robin Price approached me with an old Hammer Films script of mine from the last Hammer House of Horror series that was cancelled by Fox. With updating, he claimed that he could produce the movie and even claimed to have the funding. My name was slapped on his Avalon Films website when it appeared later. Then Avalon Associates, vanity literary agents appeared with my name being used as window dressing to snare victims. That's when I realised what the game was. Ah, I see. Watchdog didn't make that very clear. Or maybe they did but I was just momentarily dazzled by your unexpected appearance on-screen. Thought it was Albert Finney for a while. Glad to hear that you didn't actually lose anything from this. -- Digibox problem? : A reboot solves 90% of these. The Sky Digital FAQ: http://tinyurl.com/tez5 How to get UK TV overseas: http://tinyurl.com/6p73 Fed up with logos / red buttons? : http://logofreetv.org/ BBC gone? : http://www.astra2d.co.uk/ ---- Only the truth as I see it. No monies return'd. ;-) |
"Jomtien" wrote in message ... Did anyone else spot our very own James Follet in glorious technicolour on Watchdog yesterday? He was being described as "malicious" by a dubious publishing agent who had taken his fee and then had him make numerous pointless re-writes to a script that apparently had no real potential buyer. I found this part to be unusual. Why bother stringing someone along when you've got the fee anyway? From the evidence given it didn't seem possible to say whether the agent was really crooked (Watchdog rarely provides conclusive evidence and often relies on the "I'm bigger than you" approach to naming and shaming) but I was a little surprised that someone who has been around as long as James should be taken in by one of these "pay a service fee to get on my books" agents, be they of the literary or modelling type. I suppose the only good thing about it was that the sum lost was small. The wasted effort must have been much more galling. Damn I missed it, I'd loved to have seen the ****** behind the words. Did he keep correcting the interviewer's grammar, whilst making howlers himself? |
NY wrote:
Damn I missed it, Watchdog is normally repeated at least once (signed) in the early hours during the week following the original transmission. -- Digibox problem? : A reboot solves 90% of these. The Sky Digital FAQ: http://tinyurl.com/tez5 How to get UK TV overseas: http://tinyurl.com/6p73 Fed up with logos / red buttons? : http://logofreetv.org/ BBC gone? : http://www.astra2d.co.uk/ ---- Only the truth as I see it. No monies return'd. ;-) |
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 05:21:40 GMT, Jomtien wrote:
NY wrote: Damn I missed it, Watchdog is normally repeated at least once (signed) in the early hours during the week following the original transmission. CONSUMER: Watchdog Channel: BBC 1 Date: Friday 30th January 2004 Time: 05:10 to 05:40 (starting tomorrow morning) Duration: 30 minutes. Watchdog. The consumer magazine hosted by Nicky Campbell, with reporters Kate Sanderson, Paul Heiney and Ashley Blake. An investigation into couples settling big loans who are shocked to find they have tens of thousands of pounds left to pay. (Widescreen, Repeat, Signed) +++ No mention of top posting or buggery ... -- Jim Watt http://www.gibnet.com |
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 18:20:54 -0000, "NY" wrote:
"Jomtien" wrote in message .. . Did anyone else spot our very own James Follet in glorious technicolour on Watchdog yesterday? He was being described as "malicious" by a dubious publishing agent who had taken his fee and then had him make numerous pointless re-writes to a script that apparently had no real potential buyer. I found this part to be unusual. Why bother stringing someone along when you've got the fee anyway? From the evidence given it didn't seem possible to say whether the agent was really crooked (Watchdog rarely provides conclusive evidence and often relies on the "I'm bigger than you" approach to naming and shaming) but I was a little surprised that someone who has been around as long as James should be taken in by one of these "pay a service fee to get on my books" agents, be they of the literary or modelling type. I suppose the only good thing about it was that the sum lost was small. The wasted effort must have been much more galling. Damn I missed it, I'd loved to have seen the ****** behind the words. Did he keep correcting the interviewer's grammar, whilst making howlers himself? Ha ha! They are ripping our Jim in a couple of the TV groups. To the rescue, fellow demon.locallers! (X post to dl added). -- Paul My Lake District walking site (updated 29th September 2003): http://paulrooney.netfirms.com |
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 10:10:51 -0000, CW
wrote: uk.media.tv.sky , Paul Rooney , Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:54:14 +0000 Ha ha! They are ripping our Jim in a couple of the TV groups. To the rescue, fellow demon.locallers! What is it about demon users that makes them stand out from everybody else ? . Beards? -- Paul My Lake District walking site (updated 29th September 2003): http://paulrooney.netfirms.com |
"CW" wrote in message
om uk.media.tv.sky , Paul Rooney , Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:54:14 +0000 Ha ha! They are ripping our Jim in a couple of the TV groups. To the rescue, fellow demon.locallers! What is it about demon users that makes them stand out from everybody else ? . Our innate sense of fair play and justice for all. (Providing they are true Brits, of course, as a famous author would say.) Anyway, who is this agent geezer somebody was on about? Did he have anything to do with selling remainders of Jim Follett's books to www.bibliophile.co.uk , because if so, I've a bone to pick with him. I paid UKP 3 for a book a few months ago and now there's another quid been knocked off it. (Still a bit expensive though, IMHO.) You will find the book here should you wish to help out a poor author who may have been ripped off by an avaricious agent. http://www.bibliophilebooks.com/cgi-...uct/View/42482 (You might have to cut 'n' paste that URL as me and Jimbo can't make them short URL thingys 'cos we're getting on a bit and the technology is very complicated. We are both what you would call silver surfers, you know, but *demon* silver surfers which sets us apart from the others.) Please note: The company called Bibliophile has no connection with Phil Kyle, TTBOMK. -- Wim "I don't think I was ever an abuser in the dl sense of the word." |
"Paul Rooney" wrote in message
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 10:10:51 -0000, CW wrote: uk.media.tv.sky , Paul Rooney , Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:54:14 +0000 Ha ha! They are ripping our Jim in a couple of the TV groups. To the rescue, fellow demon.locallers! What is it about demon users that makes them stand out from everybody else ? . Beards? Fat bellies? -- Wim "I don't think I was ever an abuser in the dl sense of the word." |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com