|
"Dave" wrote in message
... From January 1st Family sub will be £19.50 according to letter with this months magazine. That's me off to Telewest then. I thought they charged more or less. :-) -- Simon. |
So up go the subs again
"Dave" wrote in message ... From January 1st Family sub will be £19.50 according to letter with this months magazine. That's me off to Telewest then. So TW don't ever increase their prices then:) Mike C |
"Dave" wrote in message ... From January 1st Family sub will be £19.50 according to letter with this months magazine. That's me off to Telewest then. You might save money - but I migrated FROM cable and I wouldn't go back if they offered it for free. |
"Simon Pocock" wrote in message ... "Dave" wrote in message ... From January 1st Family sub will be £19.50 according to letter with this months magazine. That's me off to Telewest then. I thought they charged more or less. :-) -- Simon. What about the full package?? Will it go up from the current £38???? |
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 14:55:19 -0000, "Simon Pocock"
wrote: "Dave" wrote in message .. . From January 1st Family sub will be £19.50 according to letter with this months magazine. That's me off to Telewest then. I thought they charged more or less. :-) But not the same? Charlie -- Remove NO-SPOO-PLEASE from my email address to reply Please send no unsolicited email or foodstuffs |
"Steeler" wrote in message ... : : You might save money - but I migrated FROM cable and I wouldn't go back if : they offered it for free. : : Yes you would. |
Ian Holmes wrote:
"Simon Pocock" wrote in message ... "Dave" wrote in message ... From January 1st Family sub will be £19.50 according to letter with this months magazine. That's me off to Telewest then. I thought they charged more or less. :-) -- Simon. What about the full package?? Will it go up from the current £38???? Aye, to 40 quid. -- somnambulist |
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 19:16:47 GMT, "somnambulist"
wrote: What about the full package?? Will it go up from the current £38???? Aye, to 40 quid. A five percent rise - well above inflation. Gav |
Tim Richards said this:
"Steeler" wrote in message ... You might save money - but I migrated FROM cable and I wouldn't go back if they offered it for free. Yes you would. I also migrated to Sky from cable (ntl) and there's absolutely no way I'm going back, even if they offered it to me for free. If they did make such an offer, I'd probably take it and keep it there as a backup (might as well if it's free), but I'd still be using Sky as my main source of televisual entertainment. |
"Dale Richards" wrote in message ... : I also migrated to Sky from cable (ntl) and there's absolutely no way I'm : going back, even if they offered it to me for free. If they did make such an : offer, I'd probably take it and keep it there as a backup (might as well if : it's free), but I'd still be using Sky as my main source of televisual : entertainment. : : The peace of mind I have gained from moving to Telewest from Sky is that Sky don't have control over my digibox (i.e can knock it out at will but "conveniently" send an engineer around for "just" £65 and all will be well again). Sorry, did I inadvertently suggest that Sky were running a racket by sending signals to knock boxes out and then rake it in by sending their own engineers to "fix" the boxes? Silly me, I didn't mean that at all. |
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:32:27 GMT, "Tim Richards"
wrote: Sorry, did I inadvertently suggest that Sky were running a racket by sending signals to knock boxes out and then rake it in by sending their own engineers to "fix" the boxes? Silly me, I didn't mean that at all. That's OK, nobody would take the suggestion seriously anyway. |
"Ant" wrote in message ... : On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:32:27 GMT, "Tim Richards" : wrote: : : Sorry, did I inadvertently suggest that Sky were running a racket by sending : signals to knock boxes out and then rake it in by sending their own : engineers to "fix" the boxes? : : Silly me, I didn't mean that at all. : : That's OK, nobody would take the suggestion seriously anyway. : That's good to know..............I just wonder how many people reading this would happily allow, without question, me to transmit a series of bytes via the internet to "update" the operating system on their computers. |
"Tim Richards" wrote in message ... "Ant" wrote in message ... : On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:32:27 GMT, "Tim Richards" : wrote: : : Sorry, did I inadvertently suggest that Sky were running a racket by sending : signals to knock boxes out and then rake it in by sending their own : engineers to "fix" the boxes? : : Silly me, I didn't mean that at all. : : That's OK, nobody would take the suggestion seriously anyway. : That's good to know..............I just wonder how many people reading this would happily allow, without question, me to transmit a series of bytes via the internet to "update" the operating system on their computers. Windows Automatic Updates but I suppose at least Bill Gates has given up the opportunity to turn that off!! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com